UFO Basics, "A - Z"
AFOSI
-The Air Force Office of
Special Investigations. A sort of Air Force version of the FBI. It is said to have been involved in UFO investigations many times.
Airships or The Great Airship - In 1896 & 1897, there was a wave of sightings across the United States of propeller-driven aircraft similar to
dirigibles. The reports are regarded as a series of newspaper hoaxes and
"Liar's Club" tales.
Alien
-A being from another planet. An extraterrestrial. There are many types mentioned, including grays -small humanoids with large heads and
large eyes, reptoids - reptilian
creatures, and nordics - blond, blue
eyed humanoids, Insectoids. Oddly, the types of aliens reported vary from
country to country. European reports favor dwarves, and South American reports
often mention hairy dwarves, while Americans usually see grays or nordics,
with occasional reptoids.
Alien
Abduction -Some people, including writer Whitley Strieber, have had experiences in which they were taken from their beds or cars
by aliens who took them into their craft for medical tests and other things.
Sometimes the people involved remember these experiences, but sometimes they
only recall them after being hypnotized. There is much disagreement as to
whether these experiences are real or whether they are some type of dreamlike
phenomenon.
The
Allagash Abductions - Four men were abducted in 1976 while fishing on the Allagash waterway
in Maine. Also a book by Raymond Fowler.
Allende
Carlos (AKA Carl Allen) -Merchant Marine sailor
on the S. S. Andrew Furuseth who later wrote letters to Morris K. Jessup,
author of The Case for the UFO. In those letters, he claimed to have been a
witness to the Philadelphia Experiment.
Ancient
Astronauts -Some people, such as Erich von Daniken, claim
that archaeological evidence proves that Earth was visited by aliens in the
past. Some also claim to find evidence of such visitation in the religions and
mythology of various cultures. Zecharia Sitchin is one of these
Annunaki
-Ancient astronauts posited by Zecheriah
Sitchin based on his interpretation of ancient Sumerian texts.
APRO -Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization - A UFO group founded in 1952 by Coral and Jim
Lorenzen. For most of its existence, it was based in Tucson, Arizona. Jim
passed away in1986, and Coral in 1988 and APRO passed with them.
Area
51 -"Area 51" is a super-secret Air
Force Base located on the Nevada Test Range. It has several other names,
including Groom Lake. The name "Area 51" came from the fact that the
site was labeled as "Area 51" on old Atomic Energy Commission maps.
The name "Groom Lake" comes from the fact that the base's runway, the
longest runway in the world, is located in a dry lake bed named Groom Lake.
This secret base is used for testing top-secret black budget aircraft. It has
been rumored that there are captured alien craft being tested there also.
Arnold,
Kenneth -While flying over the Cascade Mountains in
Washington State on June 24, 1947, businessman/pilot Kenneth Arnold observed
nine heel-shaped craft that he described as moving like a "saucer skipping
over water". Thus was born the term flying saucer.
Astronaut
UFO Sightings -Since the advent of the U.S. space program,
there have been rumors that our astronauts have seen UFOs while in space.
The
Aviary -Collective name for a loosely-knit group of
"contacts" in the government and military who were involved with UFOs
and who were given bird code names by William L. Moore.
Aztec,
New Mexico -site of a supposed UFO crash in 1948
Ball
Lightning -A little understood and very rare form of
lightning. Some scientists doubt its existence because all of the evidence is
anecdotal. The descriptions most often given are that it is spherical,
short-lived, usually only a few centimeters in diameter, and is seen
accompanying ordinary lightning. It has been used by some to explain UFO
sightings, although it fits very few sighting descriptions.
Belgian
UFO Sightings -Eupen & Wavre, Belgium were the site of a
series of mysterious UFO sightings in 1989 - 1990.
Bennewitz,
Paul -An Albuquerque, New Mexico physicist and
electronics firm owner. He was also a member of the APRO UFO group, and in 1979
he began monitoring strange lights over the Manzano Test Range Facility.
Bentwaters-Woodbridge
-Forest near Woodbridge, Suffolk, England. It
was the site of a well-known UFO event on 27 December 1980. Also known as the
Rendlesham Forest UFO event.
Bermuda
Triangle -A triangle-shaped area of ocean formed roughly
by the island of Bermuda, the island of Puerto Rico, and the eastern coast of
Florida. UFOs are often seen in the area.
Black
Aircraft -Experimental top secret aircraft whose
development is paid for out of the black budget. The U-2 spy plane, the SR-71
Blackbird, and the Stealth Fighter all began as "Black Aircraft."
Many of these aircraft are tested at Area 51.
Black
Budget -A "slush fund" of federal budget
money that can be spent without specific justification to Congress. This is
possible because it is deemed necessary for defense research in order to
maintain National Security. Blue Book, Project - The third, and longest
lasting, Air Force UFO investigation. It's main objective was to explain [away]
UFO reports.
Boianai,
Papua, New Guinea -Anglican missionary Father William Booth Gill
reported UFOs over Boianai, Papua, New Guinea in 1959.
Brazel,
William "Mac" -Sheep rancher who
first discovered the Roswell debris on the Foster Ranch in 1947.
Cash - Landrum Incident - In
1980, near Huffman, Texas, Betty Cash, Vickie Landrum, and Betty's grandson
Colby had a close encounter with a UFO that was apparently being escorted by
military helicopters. The three, particularly Betty Cash, then had a series of
health problems that they felt were related to their encounter.
Cattle
Mutilations -Ranchers find cattle dead, with soft body
parts such as eyes, lips, udders, and sex organs surgically removed. Whodunnit?
Sometimes UFOs are seen concurrently with the mutilations, and sometimes black
helicopters are seen in the area.
Close
Encounters:See Hynek UFO Classification System.
Condon
Report -In 1966, the US Air Force commissioned the
University of Colorado to make a scientific study of UFOs. Headed by Dr. Edward
Condon, in 1969 the group published The Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying
Objects which debunked the UFO phenomena. The Condon Report was used as an
excuse to close down Project Blue Book, which many say was its only purpose
anyhow.
Chiles,
Clarence -Eastern Airlines pilot who sighted a UFO near
Montgomery, Alabama, on July 24, 1948.
Cigar
-Some
UFOs have been reported to be
cigar-shaped.
Contactee
-A person who claims that aliens have visited
them personally.
Cooper,
Milton William "Bill" -Radio
personality and writer of Behold a Pale Horse. Noted for various conspiracy
theories.
Corso,
Colonel Philip J. - Retired U.S. Army, author of The Day After
Roswell. Claimed in the book to have been given technology from the crashed
Roswell UFO for the purpose of leaking the technology surreptitiously to
American industry and the military.
Coyne,
Captain Lawrence J. -Coyne & others aboard a National Guard
helicopter had a close brush with a UFO in 1973 near Manfield, Ohio.
Crop
Circles -In the 1970s, large, circles of flattened
grain began to appear in British fields. The circles gradually became more
complex, forming something like pictograms. Many researchers tried to explain
them by theories including magnetic fields, plasma vortices, twisters, alien
visitors leaving messages, and love crazed hedgehogs. In 1991, two guys named
Doug Bower and Dave Chorley of Southampton in Britain announced that they had
been making crop circles for 15 years. They had hatched the idea over a pint or
two in their local pub. No matter. The circles continue to appear, and have
spread all over the world.
Debunker
-Debunkers are more extreme than skeptics.
Debunkers generally refuse to even entertain the possibility that any UFO could
be anything unusual. Debunkers are sometimes so fanatic about finding a
non-extraterrestrial explanation for a UFO sighting that they violate
scientific principles to do so. With hundreds of trillions planets are out
there one cannot say "we are all alone and everything out there is for us!"
this would be extremely selfish, naive, brain dead, and truly blind to the fact
Thousands of years ago scientist and the
general population of the time laughed at you when you told them the earth was
round. Now we can learn a few things from this 1 we don't not learn from our
history 2 we do not from our mistakes 3 history repeats itself 4 the earth is
round now with that in mind our modern
scientist and general population laughs at you when you say that there is no
way we are alone.
Delphos,
Kansas -Site where the Johnson family had a close
encounter in 1971.
Devil's
Triangle -Another name for the Bermuda Triangle.
Disinformation
-An intelligence tactic used to protect
top-secret information by diluting or covering the truth with false information.
Dogon
-Tribe in Mali, Africa, who inexplicably seem
to have knowledge of the invisible companion of the star Sirius, which cannot
be seen without a telescope.
Doty,
Sergeant Richard C. -Air Force Ofice of Special Investigations -
Served in Laos & Vietnam. Later transferred to AFOSI & was assigned to
Kirtland AFB. Investigated Weitzel UFO sighting & Paul Bennewitz. Later
served in West Germany. After retiring from USAF, became a New Mexico Highway
Patrolman. A friend and/or associate of William L. Moore.
Dreamland
-Another name for Area 51. It's the term used
by the Nellis AFB control tower to refer to the base.
Dulce
-While investigating cattle mutilations on the
Jicarillo Indian Reservation outside Dulce, New Mexico, Paul Bennewitz saw
mysterious objects rising from Mt. Archuleta. He deduced, or was disinformed
into believing, that there must be an alien base inside the mountain. Others
have added to the story since, and the Dulce base has become legendary.
Earthquake
Lights - Lights which sometimes
appear just before or during an earthquake.
Estimate of the Situation - In 1948, Project
Sign personnel thought it time to make a formal Estimate of the Situation
giving the results of their investigation of UFOs so far. This was sent to Air
Force Chief of Staff General Hoyt Vandenburg, who rejected the report's
conclusion that UFOs were extraterrestrial in origin. He ordered the report
destroyed.
Exeter
-City in New Hampshire that was the site of a
wave of UFO sightings beginning in September, 1965. Book:Incident at Exeter by
John G. Fuller.
Face
on Mars -A mysterious plateau in the Cydonia area of
Mars that looks like a face in some photos. Some say it must have been created
by intelligent life. NASA says it's a natural formation combined with a trick
of light.
Falcon
Lake -lake in Whiteshell Provincial Park, Manitoba,
Canada, where, in 1967 prospector Stephen Michalak had a close encounter with a
UFO that left him with burns across his chest.
fata
morgana -A type of mirage that seems to be a castle or
a city floating on the ocean.
Fermi Paradox - A question first asked by
physicist Enrico Fermi - "If there are intelligent extraterrestrials out
there, why haven't they contacted us?".
Feuerball
-Supposedly a flying craft developed by the
Nazis during World War Two.
Firmage,
Joe -Former CEO of USWeb, who quit to form the
International Space Sciences Organization and to write The Truth, about UFOs
and space travel, among other things.
Flatwoods,
West Virginia -Site of a burning object crash and sightings of
a mysterious creature in 1952.
Flight
19 -Ill-ftaed group of five avenger aircraft on a
training mission from Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Disappeared in the Bermuda
Triangle in 1945.
Flying
Saucer -This is a name for certain types of UFOs. It
originated when Kenneth Arnold described the objects that he saw as looking
like a "saucer skipping across water."
Foo
Fighters -During World War II, both sides reported
strange lights and objects flying alongside their planes. Each side at first
believed they were some kind of a new secret weapon belonging to the other
side. No explanation was ever found. The name foo fighter comes from a WWII
cartoon character named "Smoky Stover" who said Where there's foo,
there's fire!.
Ford,
John -President of the Long Island UFO Network.
Arrested in 1996 for conspiring to poison local officials with radium.
Fort,
Charles -(1874 - 1932) The first UFOlogist &
investigator of unusual phenomena. Author of several books including The Book
of the Damned and Lol!.
Fowler,
Raymond -Abduction researcher & author of the
Andreasson Affair and The Allagash Abductions, among others.
Friedman,
Stanton -Physicist, formerly worked for Westinghouse.
Author of Crash at Corona (With Don Berliner), and Top Secret/Majic. One of the
primary investigators of the Roswell Incident and the MJ-12 documents.
Ghost
Rockets -Many unidentified aerial objects were reported
over Scandinavia in 1946 - 1947. They looked like missiles with a flame exhaust
at one end flying at various speeds.
Gill,
Father William Booth - Anglican missionary who reported UFOs over
Boianai, Papua, New Guinea in 1959.
Green
Fireballs -Objects seen in the skies of New Mexico,
mainly in 1948 -1949. They had the appearance of brilliant green balls of
light. Project Twinkle was set up to study them. They were never explained, but
the best theory seems to be that they were some type of meteorite.
Grudge,
Project -In 1949, Project Sign was replaced by Project
Grudge, the second Air Force UFO investigation. Its name reflected its
attitude. It mainly sought to debunk UFO sightings.
Hill,
Betty and Barney -Married couple who were purportedly abducted
from their car by aliens in the White Mountains of New Hampshire in 1961. He
was a postal worker and she was a social worker. Called the first
"modern" abductees.
Hopkins,
Budd -Abduction researcher and author. His books
include Missing Time, Intruders, and Witnessed!.
Hudson
Valley -Area of New York state that was the site of a
series of UFO sightings beginning in 1983.
Hynek
UFO sightings Classification System:
Hynek,
J. Allen -Astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Ohio
State University (1935 - 1953); Advisor to Project Grudge(1948) - 1952; Advisor
to Project Bluebook (1952 - 1969); Associate Director of the Smithsonian Astrophysical
Laboratory at Harvard (1956 - 1960);Professor of Astronomy at Northwestern
University (1960 - 1978) In 1973, he founded CUFOS, the Center for UFO studies.
Illinois,
Lebanon and Millstadt -A large UFO was seen
by several police officers in this area on the night of January 5, 2000.
Irwin,
Private Gerry -Nike missile technician from Fort Bliss, who
had an odd experience after seeing an object land in a field in 1959. He later
deserted and vanished.
Jacobs,
David M. -Abduction researcher and author. His books
include The Threat and Secret Life.
JAL1628
-Japan Airlines 747 that was followed by a UFO
over Alaska in 1986.
Jessup,
Morris K. -Astronomer and author of UFO books, notably
The Case for The UFO. Committed suicide in 1959. Also see The Philadelphia
Experiment
Kecksburg,
Pennsylvania -Site of a mysterious crash of an object in
1966.
Kelly
- Hopkinsville, Kentucky- Site where the Sutton
family was beseiged by "goblins" in 1955.
Keyhoe,
Major Donald E. -U.S. Marine Corps. An aide to Charles
Lindbergh. Began writing about UFOs for True magazine in 1949. Author: The
Flying Saucers are Real, published in 1950. Later director of NICAP from 1957
to 1969.
kugelblitz
-Supposedly a flying craft developed by the
Nazis during World War Two.
Lago
de Cote -a lake in Costa Rica over which a government
mapping camera on board an aircraft took an unexplained photo of an apparent
UFO in 1971.
Lagrange Points -Points
in the orbit of a body around another body where their gravities are in equilibrium.
Lear,
John- Ex-CIA pilot. Son of Edward Lear, of Lear Jet fame. UFO personality
& conspiracy theorist.
Loedding,
Alfred -member of Project Sign. Designer of unusual
aircraft.
Long-Distance
Echoes - A radio phenomenon in
which transmissions are reflected back to Earth by some unknown mechanism.
Loring
AFB, Maine -U.S. Air Force Base. Site of some unusual UFO
events on 27 October 1975.
Mack,
John -Harvard psychiatrist and abduction researcher.
Author of Abduction - Human Encounters with Aliens.
Majestic-12
-a group of twelve high-ranking scientists,
military leaders, and government officials that was formed by executive order
of President Harry Truman to investigate the UFO phenomenon. MJ-12 was first
brought to public attention with the 1987 release of the MJ-12 documents. These
documents purported to be copies of top-secret documents given by an anonymous
"insider" to film producer Jaime Shandera.
Mansfield,
Ohio -Town where Lawrence J. Coyne & others aboard
a National Guard helicopter had a close brush with a UFO in 1973.
Marcel,
Major Jesse -Intelligence officer at Roswell Army Air Base
who investigated the Roswell crash in July, 1947.
Malmstrom
AFB, Montana -U.S. Air Force base in Montana. Site of
unusual UFO events in 1966, 1967, and 1975.
Mantell,
Captain Thomas -Pilot who Crashed near Fort Knox, Kentucky while
chasing a UFO.
McDonald,
James E. -Professor of meteorology at the University of
Arizona. Staunch supporter of a formal scientific investigation of UFOs. Called
for congressional investigation of UFOs. Author: Science in Default: Twenty-two
Years of Inadequate UFO Investigations. Committed suicide in 1971.
Men in
Black -The Men In Black, or MIB, are a supposed group
of individuals who dress in black suits and drive black cars. They are said to
threaten people who have UFO encounters in order to deter them from talking
about the incident.
Mexico
City, 1991 -During the solar eclipse on July 11, 1991,
camcorder enthusiasts in Mexico captured inexplicable images of a UFO on
videotape.
Michilak,
Stephen -Prospector who had a close encounter with a UFO
in 1967 at Falcon Lake in Whiteshell Provincial Park, Manitoba, Canada, that
left him with burns across his chest.
Missing
Time -Those who see UFOs sometimes discover that
there are periods of time that they cannot account for. Regression hypnosis
sometimes reveals that they were abducted by aliens during these periods of
missing time.
Mogul,
Project - a top-secret 1947
project that used high-altitude balloons to attempt to detect Soviet nuclear
tests.
Moriches
Bay, Long Island -Site where the U.S. allegedly shot down and
recovered a UFO in 1989. Also site of the TWA Flight 800 disaster in 1996.
Mothership
-Some observers have reported large UFOs out of
which smaller craft seem to come. Sort of like a UFO "aircraft
carrier."
Moncla,
Lieutenant Felix -Air Force F-89 pilot who, along with his
navigator Lieutenant R. R. Wilson, disappeared while chasing a UFO over Lake
Superior in 1953.
Montauk
Project -Purported government time-travel experiment
that took place at Montauk Air Station on Long Island. Related to The
Philadelphia Experiment.
Moore,
William L. -Former schoolteacher. Member of NICAP and
APRO. Writer, with Charles Berlitz, of The Philadelphia Experiment: Project
Invisibility and The Roswell Incident. Was involved in the Paul Bennewtiz affair
and is a friend and/or associate of Richard S. Doty, Stanton Friedman, and
Jaime Shandera. One of the principal investigators of the original
MJ-12 documents. Had a group of contacts
within the government and the military whom he gave bird code names and whom he
referred to as the Aviary.
Moore, William L. - co-author, with Charles
Berlitz, of The Philadelphia Experiment and The Roswell Incident.
MUFON -The Mutual UFO Network. The largest UFO
organization in the world.
Mothman - A mysterious winged creature who appeared
around Point Pleasant, West Virginia in 1966 - 1967.
NICAP - National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomenona. UFO Group that was the most powerful in it's heyday. For much of
its existence it was led by Major Donald Keyhoe.
Nephilim - Another name for the Annunaki, ancient
astronauts posited by Zecheriah Sitchin based on his interpretation of ancient
Sumerian texts.
"Old Hag" - A form of sleep
paralysis in which an individual senses a presence in his bedroom, even on the bed
or on top of him. Palmer, Raymond - Editor of Amazing Stories magazine in the
1940's & later of Fate Magazine. Some credit him with originating the
extraterrestrial hypothesis for the origin of UFOs.
O'Brien, Kevin – An Abductee and contatee. Who
was taken a few times in October of 2010. Has evidence of missing time,
remembers almost everything that had happened to him. He is also a contactee
with Humanoid looking beings with wooden staffs Kevin also has star map chart information.
Papoose Lake - Another dry lake near Groom Lake or Area 51.
Papoose Lake is where Bob Lazar claims that alien craft are being tested. Also
known as S-4
Papua, New Guinea - Anglican missionary Father William Booth Gill
reported UFOs over Boianai, Papua, New Guinea in 1959.
Pascagoula, Mississippi - Site of the abduction
of Calvin Parker and Charles Hickson on October 11, 1973.
The Philadelphia Experiment - Purported 1943
experiment by the U.S. Navy at the Philadelphia Naval Yards in which the U.S.S.
Eldridge was made invisible, with dire consequences for her crew.
Phoenix Lights - A huge UFO flap occurred in and around
Phoenix, Arizona, on the night of March 13, 1997.
Portage County, Ohio - Site where police
chased a UFO for forty-odd miles in 1966.
Randle, Kevin - Author of many UFO books, including The Truth
About the UFO Crash at Roswell with Donald Schmitt.
Rare Earth Hypothesis - Hypothesis that, since
the combination of factors that contributed to the evolution of intelligence on
Earth are rare in the cosmos, then so must intelligence life be rare in the
cosmos.
Red Bluff, California - Site where California
Highway Patrolmen saw a UFO in 1960.
Rendlesham Forest - Forest near Woodbridge, Suffolk, England. It
was the site of a well-known UFO event on 27 December 1980. Also known as the
Bentwaters-Woodbridge UFO event.
Regression Hypnosis - The practice of trying
to recover lost memories by hypnotizing a subject and taking them back in their
minds to the time in question. The problems with it are that the hypnotist can
unwittingly plant "memories" in the subject's mind, and hypnotized
subjects sometimes invent (confabulate) memories in order to comply with a
hypnotist's requests.
Robertson Panel - A 1952 CIA-sponsored panel that recommended a
policy of debunking UFOs be pursued.
Roswell Incident - In July, 1947, a rancher named Mac Brazel
found some odd, silvery debris on the ranch at which he worked. He took some of
it into the county sheriff's office and the sheriff turned it over to the local
Army Air Base. The Air Base sent Major Jesse Marcel, the base intelligence
officer, out to investigate, and he collected a lot of debris, which he took
back to the base. Mac Brazel was held for several days for questioning, and the
Roswell Air Base information officer released a story to the press that said a
"flying disc" had been captured. Major Marcel and the debris were
flown to Carswell Air Base in Texas, where General Roger Ramey held a press
conference at which he announced that the debris was only a weather balloon.
Years later, before he died, Jesse Marcel claimed that the debris was not a
weather balloon, but that it was something "not of this Earth."
Several popular books were written that claimed that an alien craft had been
recovered at Roswell and that the incident was covered up by the military.
Finally, in 1995, the Air Force issued a statement that the debris was that of
a top secret Project Mogul balloon train and radar reflectors. The debate still
rages.
Sedona - a town in Arizona that has acquired a
reputation for being a UFO "hotspot".
S
ETI - Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence. The
search for life on other worlds by using radio telescopes to listen for
possible radio signals from space.
Shandera, Jaime - Producer of TV documentaries. Friend and
associate of William L. Moore and Stanton Friedman. He was the individual to
whom the roll of film containing the MJ-12 documents was delivered.
Shag Harbour - a harbor and town on the east coast of Nova
Scotia where, in 1967, an unknown "something" fell from the sky into
the harbour.
Sign, Project - The first official USAF investigation which
started in January, 1948. Also known as Project Saucer. Probably the only
honest Air Force effort to find out what UFOs were. The project ended in
February 1949 when the goals of the Air Force regarding UFO investigations changed.
Skeptic - Someone who doesn't believe that UFOs are
alien spacecraft because there is not enough evidence. Skeptics are generally
more open-minded than debunkers.
Sleep Paralysis - A sleep disorder in which an individual
awakens to sense a presence in his bedroom, even on the bed or on top of him.
The victim is unable to move, hence the name.
Socorro, New Mexico - Lonnie Zamora, a
sergeant for the Socorro Police Department, witnessed a UFO landing on Friday,
April 24,1964 in Socorro. His sighting has never been adequately explained.
South Haven Park, Long Island - Site of an alleged UFO
crash in 1992.
Spitzbegen - Norwegian Island inside the arctic circle
where a purported UFO crash occurred.
Sturrock Panel - a panel of scientists, headed by Stanford's
Peter Sturrock, who studied the available UFO evidence and deemed the study of
UFOs to be worthy of formal scientific investigation.
Tehran, Iran - Site of a well-documented UFO sighting on 19
September, 1976.
Trindade Island - a Brazilian island where, in 1958, a photographer
on borad a Brazilian Navy scientific research ship snapped several photos of a
UFO.
Tully, Queensland, Australia - The first "crop
circle" appeared in Horseshoe Lagoon near here in 1966. Twinkle, Project -
A project to study the green fireballs seen in New Mexico in 1948 & 1949.
The project was not adequately funded and never produced any results.
UFO - UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. It
doesn't necessarily mean an alien craft, although it is often used that way. It
just means some object in the sky that is unknown.
UFOlogist - A UFO investigator or researcher.
UFOlogy - The study of UFO phenomena.
University of Colorado UFO Project - See
Condon Report
Valentich, Frederick - He and his Cessna 182
disappeared over the Bass Straits between Australia and Tasmania. Just before
radio contact was lost, he reported that his plane was being followed by an
unidentified aircraft.
Varginha, Brazil - City in Brazil where, in 1996, aliens were
supposedly captured or alien bodies recovered.
Villas-Boas, Antonio - Brazilian farmer who
claimed to have been taken on board a UFO, where he was seduced by a female
alien.
Vimanas - Ancient Hindu writings describe flying craft
called vimanas.
Walk-in - An extraterrestrial soul that has been
invited to take over a human body by the body's current inhabitant.
Walton, Travis - abducted by a UFO from Apache-Sitgreaves
National Forest in 1975.
Wanderer - An extraterrestrial soul that has chosen to be
born into a human body.
Washington Nationals - In July, 1952, many
pilots and radar operators reported UFOs in the Washington D.C. area. Some were
attributed to false radar blips caused by a temperature inversion. However,
some of the radar sightings were corroborated by visual sightings. These were
never explained.
Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan - U.S. Air Force base in
Michigan. Site of unusual UFO events in October 1975.
This page
is under construction
TheRockefeller Report,
Excerpts
LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT for
the BRIEFING DOCUMENT on
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
December 15, 1995
To whom it may concern:
We believe that this Briefing Document on Unidentified Flying
Objects presents the best available evidence for the existence of UFOs.
Although just a brief sample of the scientific and military evidence available
worldwide is given, it represents some of the most _carefully _documented
incidents.
While several governments of the world have dealt with this
problem, as you can see in the enclosed report we think that these governments
should make available now all the UFO evidence they have collected, for a
thorough and open inquiry by the scientific community.
The political constraints that imposed the rule of secrecy
during the Cold War are no longer justified and the solution to the UFO mystery
may represent both a scientific and social breakthrough.
Without the enthusiastic assistance of many people, the
creation of this Briefing Document would have been far more difficult, if not
impossible. While there are too many for us to thank individually, some deserve
special recognition:
Laurance S. Rockefeller, for his vision and support,
financial and otherwise, and George Lamb, for his day-to-day interest and for
serving so effectively as liaison for Mr. Rockefeller.
Marie "Bootsie" Galbraith, for the original idea
and for hundreds of hours of turning it into reality. Sandra Wright, for making
her BSW Foundation available as the umbrella under which all the work could be
done. Tina Nighman, for applying her talents and good humor to a wide range of
administrative assistance.
The leadership of the UFO Research Coalition: the Center for
UFO Studies, the Fund for UFO Research and the Mutual UFO Network, for their
cooperative efforts and total support.
Major General Wilfred De Brouwer, Deputy Chief of the Royal
Belgian Air Force; Dr. Claude Poher, founder of the Groupe d'Etudes des
Phenomenes Aerospatiaux Non-identifie's (GEPAN), Jean-Jacques Velasco, Director
of the Service d'Expertise des Phenomenes de Rentrees Atmospheriques (SEPRA);
the Societe Belge d'Etude des Phenomenes Spatiaux (SOBEPS), and internationally
recognized UFO authorities Stanton T. Friedman and Timothy Good, for generously
giving their time and help.
The Letter of Endorsement
Acknowledgments
Part 1. Overview
Government Secrecy
The Case for UFO Reality
The UFO Cover-Up
Summary of Quotations
Part 2. Case Histories
Introduction
1944-45: "Foo Fighters" Over Europe and Asia
1946: "Ghost Rockets Over Scandinavia"
1947: First American Sighting Wave
1952: Second American Sighting Wave
1956: Radar/Visual Jet Chase Over England
1957: Third American Sighting Wave
1958: Brazilian Navy Photographic Case
1964: Landing Case At Socorro, New Mexico
1967: Physiological Case At Falcon Lake, Canada
1975: Strategic Air Command Bases UFO Alert
1976: Multiple Witness Case In The Canary Islands
1976: UFO Dog-Fight Over Tehran
1980: UFO Incidents at Rendlesham Forest, England
1981: Physical Trace Case In Trans-en-Provence, France
1986: Jet Chase Over Brazil
1986: Japan Airlines 747 Case Over Alaska
1989: Multiple Witness Case At Russian Missile Base
1989-90: UFO Sighting Wave In Belgium
1991-94: Recent Cases
Summary
Part 3. Quotations
Appendices Characteristics of IFOs and UFOs
Terminology of UFOs
International Agreements and Resolutions
Recommended Reading
Resource Catalogs
CUFOS, FUFOR and MUFON
Part 1. Overview
- 5 -
GOVERNMENT SECRECY
In a democracy, the decision where to draw the line between
a citizen's right to know and the government's right to secrecy for national
security reasons must be made by appropriate members of the society.
This issue has become the focus of much attention today and
is especially relevant to an ongoing discussion, both inside and outside
Congress, regarding UFO phenomena.
For obvious reasons, military services and the intelligence
agencies must maintain a certain amount of secrecy. However, in recent decades,
and especially since the end of the Cold War, many observers believe that the
use of government secrecy has become excessive.
The power of government employees to restrict access to
reports which they write by classifying them "confidential,"
"secret" or even "top secret" is often absolute. Once these
reports are classified, they can only be declassified by the originator or by a
special procedure that moves along at a glacial pace.
Nor does the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) help very
much. It does not apply to most classified material. Meanwhile, our criminal
statutes protect against the unauthorized revelation of classified materials.
Secrecy, like power, lends itself to abuse. Behind the
shield of secrecy, it is possible for an agency or service to avoid scrutiny
and essentially to operate outside of the law. Accountability to the taxpayers
and to the Congress can be conveniently avoided.
The vast majority of people employed by the U.S. government
do not have access to classified information. Even those with secret and top
secret clearances will not have access to all highly classified information.
Furthermore, it is doubtful whether any member of Congress
can have access to all such information. Given the size of the government
bureaucracy and high degree of compartmentalization that exists within it, it
is conceivable that even the President himself is not fully briefed on matters
classified as "above top secret."
Such information, allowing access only on the strictest
"need-to-know" basis, is not necessarily given to senior elected
officials who come and go and can therefore be regarded as temporary, political
and unreliable.
Such is the case for top secret UFO information. In 1980,
for example, researchers requesting information through the FOIA learned of the
existence of 156 top secret UFO-related documents held by the National Security
Agency (NSA).
This lead was not found through the NSA itself, but through
internal references in UFO-related documents held by other government agencies.
When the researchers filed a FOIA request for the 156 NSA UFO documents, they
were denied access to all of them. They appealed, but Judge Gerhard Gesell of
the First Federal Court, District of Columbia, after reviewing the 21-page
written argument submitted by the NSA, denied their appeal.
The 21-page summary was later released, but even in this
summary most of the information was blacked out.
========================================================================
(1) Judge Gesell Ruling re National Security Agency,
November 14, 1980.
========================================================================
- 6 -
Such action seems inconsistent with a government that
officially downplays the existence of true UFOs, and officially states that
there is no threat to national security.
In the case of UFO phenomena, the question must be asked:
what would give an un-elected government official the right to keep this
information to himself, thereby depriving the rest of the world of possible
knowledge of almost inconceivable magnitude and consequence?
Such elitism by the officials of any government, much less a
government based on the principles of democracy and individual rights, is a
gross injustice not only to its ovn people, but to all people.
At issue, in this case, is access to knowledge perhaps so
profound that it affects not only our very perspective on man's place in the
universe,but also perhaps his continued presence on this planet.
If the UFO phenomenon is real, we have clear evidence that
an unknown technology is at work, whose potential could be enormous for the
good of mankind - a potential source, for example, for useful energy benign to
the environment.
To acknowledge the enormous gap between our present
understanding of science and what is being evidenced, would provide the
urgently needed challenge to the scientific establishment to examine where some
of its basic assumptions might be faulty and to move berond them.
Is it possible that a few privileged individuals have access
to this information while denying it to the electorate for "national
security" reasons, so that it can be privately studied? In a democracy,
should not this decision be made by our _elected officials and be based upon an
informed discussion?
"UFO research is leading us kicking and screaming into
the science of the twenty-first century.
"I have begun to feel that there is a tendency in 20th
Century science to forget that there will be a 21st Century science, and indeed
a 30th Century science from which vantage points our knowledge of the universe
may appear quite different than it does to us.
We suffer, perhaps, from temporal provincialism, a form of
arrogance that has always irritated posterity." (From a letter by Dr. J.
Allen Hynek to Science magazine, August 1. 1966.)
Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Northwestern University astronomer;
scientific consultant on UFOs to the U.S. Air Force from 1948 until 1969.
Founder of the private Center for UFO Studies in 1973.
- 7 -
THE CASE
FOR UFO REALITY
As long as men and women have talked about strange sights in
the skies, two primary questions have been asked about what has come to be
called Unidentified Flying Objects:
1. Are they real, or are they just honest mistakes?
2. If they are real, could they be ships from some other
world?
In this century, it started with the "foo
fighters" of World War II: glowing balls that flew in formation or
"played tag" with military airplanes over Europe and the Pacific.
Suspected of being prototype enemy weapons, they never displayed hostility and
when the war was over, they were all-but-forgotten.
In 1946, the Scandinavian countries reported many hundreds
of "ghost rockets" which flew low and silently, and often slowly.
Efforts to blame them on nearby Soviet tests of captured German missiles failed
when it was learned that no such tests had taken place.
The first major American wave of sightings of "flying
discs" began in the early summer of 1947. Within two weeks, at least 1,000
sightings were recorded of fast silvery discs seen in the daytime. The first
military studies concluded they were real and of unknown nature and origin. (2)
>From then on, UFOs seemed to fly at will over all parts
of the world: fast and exotic, untouchable and and unproven. By the 1990s,
there had been over 100,000 reported sightings, many by airline pilots and
military pilots and other qualified witnesses.
Despite the steady accumulation of a vast quantity of
information about the appearance and behavior of UFOs, little light has been
shed on the two questions posed at the beginning. The armed services and
universities, as well as private groups and individuals, have devoted a great
amount of time to investigating UFOs, yet there is no consensus about their
nature, origins or purpose.
Still, if a close look is taken at the best available
evidence, it is possible to deal with what is known about UFOs, and what may
reasonably be assumed. The point we will make is that the evidence to support
the conclusion that UFOs are unknown aircraft/spacecraft seems to be
overwhelming.
========================================================================
(2) Memo from Lt. Gen. Nathan
Twining, Commanding General of the Air Materiel Command, Wright Field, to Gen.
Spaatz, Commanding General of the U.S. Army Air Forces, September 23, 1947.
========================================================================
- 8 -
Visual Evidence
Most of what is "known" about UFOs comes from
individuals' descriptions of what they say they saw. If the individuals are
reliable and knowledgeable about the sky, the information stands a good chance
of being useful.
This is the source of the case's "credibility,"
one of the two primary criteria recognized by the late Dr. J. Allen Hynek, long
a consultant on UFOs to the U.S. Air Force, and later the founder of the
private Center for UFO Studies.
Dr. Hynek's other criterion is "strangeness,"
meaning the extent to which a reported observation differs from normal
airplanes, satellites, meteors, etc. A large aluminum-looking sphere which
maneuvers violently and changes speed abruptly, rates higher for
"strangeness" than a somewhat peculiar light seen in the night sky.
It is the reports which rate highest in both
"credibility" and "strangeness" that form the heart of the
UFO mystery. Are they indeed convincing observations of unknown
aircraft/spacecraft, or are they merely strangely shaped clouds or balloons
seen under unusual lighting conditions, or some other natural or manmade
phenomena?
Radar Evidence
Radar has played a major role in UFO sightings, repeatedly confirming
the presence of something unidentified which responds to radar much as an
airplane does. Clouds and other weather phenomena show up on radar, but any
experienced operator can tell the difference between weather and something
solid.
On popular explanation for radar/visual reports is
temperature inversion. This was first brought to public attention following two
nights of UFO sightings over Washington D.C., in 1952.
Inversions, the cause of mirages, probably never caused
these or any other UFO reports. According to a 1969 study by the Air Force
Environmental Technical Applications Center, the conditions needed to produce
the UFO-like effects attributed to inversions cannot exist in the Earth's
atmosphere. (3)
The most thoroughly investigated recent radar/visual UFO
sightings occurred in Belgium and Russia. Military jet interceptors were
launched following observations from the ground.
Ground-based and airborne radars then confirmed what was
being seen visually, including high speeds and violent maneuvers far beyond the
capability of the best modern warplanes. In both countries, high government
officials admitted they were baffled.
While the human eye can be fooled, and radar can be fooled,
it is considered extremely unlikely that both can be fooled, in exactly the
same way, at exactly the same time. Thus radar/visual reports rate among the
most convincing of all types of UFO sightings.
==============================================================
(3) Menkello, F.V., "Quantitative Aspects of Mirages,"
USAF Environmental Technical Applications Center, 1969.
==============================================================
- 9 -
Physical Evidence
UFOs have been seen high in the sky, near to the ground, on
the ground, and even rising from water. If some UFOs have landed, it is
reasonable to suspect that some of them may have left traces behind, and indeed
that is the case.
Imprints, residues, charred and broken tree branches and
rocks are among the bits of evidence claimed for UFO landings. Furthermore,
under microscopic examination, some residues exhibit strange and unusual
characteristics.
Perhaps the most well known example of a physical trace case
in the United States occurred in 1964 near Socorro, New Mexico, where a
policeman reported seeing an egg-shaped craft sitting on slender legs in an
open field. When it had flown away, he and a second policeman inspected the
area where it had been parked and found depressions in the dirt, as well as
still smoldering, blackened shrubs.
The sighting was investigated within two hours by men from
U.S. Army Intelligence and the FBI, followed a day later by the chief civilian
scientific consultant to Project Blue Book (the official Air Force
investigation of UFO sightings).
All agreed that the primary witness was highly reliable.
Later, the final director of Blue Book called this case the most puzzling of
the approximately 12,500 in his files.
The best documented example of a physical trace case in
Europe occurred in Trans-en-Provence, France, where a farmer reported seeing a
saucer-shaped craft land on his property and then fly away after a short while.
Physical traces left on the ground were collected by the
police within 2 hours and later analyzed in several French government
laboratories. Microscopic analyses revealed anomalous biochemical and
electromagnetic effects on the soil and vegetation.
The diector of the Service d'Expertise des Phenomenes de
Rentrees Atmospheriques (SEPRA, formerly called GEPAN) at the National Center
for Space Studies (CNES) describes this case as the most puzzling UFO case in
the French government files.
(5)
Government Statements
The involvement of the American government in the UFO
mystery has long offered its own set of questions. Known investigations have
produced ambiguous results, and explanations offered for specific cases have
frequently been at odds with scientific reasoning. Sometimes, little-publicized
official statements have supported the position that UFOs are real and
unexplained.
==============================================================
(4) Steiger Brad, ed.
_Project Blue Book, Ballantine Books, 196.
(5) GEPAN, Note Technique No. 16 Enquete 81/01, _Analyse
d'une Trace, Toulouse, March 1, 1983. (English translation published in the
MUFON UFO Journal, March 1984.)
==============================================================
- 10 -
Sometimes statements not intended for the public have been
brought to the surface by UFO researchers:
July 30, 1947: "This Flying saucer" situation is
not all imaginary or seeing too much in some natural phenomena. Something is
really flying around. (6)
Sept. 23, 1947: "The phenomenon reported is something
real and not visionary or fictitious. " (7)
Oct. 28, 1947. "It is the considered opinion of some
elements that the object [sic may in fact represent an interplanetary craft of
some kind." (8)
Dec. 10, 1948: "It must be accepted that some type of
flying objects have been observed, although their identification and origin are
not discernible." (9)
In 1948, the U.S. Air Force opened a publicly-known UFO
investigation called Project Sign. Later, it became Project Grudge and finally
Project Blue Book. In 1955, the U.S. Air Force released a study of 3,200 UFO
reports it had received between 1947 and 1952.
The private Battelle Memorial Institute used the Air Force
data to arrive at its own conclusions: of the cases for which there was some
conclusion, almost 50% were either unexplained, or doubtfully explained.
Moreover, it was determined that the higher the
qualifications of the witnesses, the harder it was to explain the reports in
terms of common phenomena. (10)
In 1967, as Project Blue Book was coming under increasing
attack from the press and the public, the Air Force contracted with the
University of Colorado to make a final study of UFOs.
In contrast to the totally negative statements of the study
director, Dr. Edward U. Condon, the body of the f1nal report showed that about
30% of the cases studied were left without explanation.
Comments on individual cases by University of Colorado
scientists included:
==============================================================
(6) Air Force Base Intelligence Report, "Flying
Discs," AFBIR-CO, July 30, 1947.
(7) Twining, ibid
(8) Draft Intelligence Collections Memorandum issued by Brig.
Gen. George Shulgen, Chief of the Air Intelligence Requirements Division of the
Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, October 28, 1947.
(9) U.S. Air Intelligence Report 100-203-79, "Analysis
of Flying Objects in the U.S.," December 10, 1948.
(10) Air Force Project Blue Book, "Special Report No.
14 (Analysis of Reports of Unidentified Aerial Objects)," May 5, 1955.
==============================================================
- 11 -
"This is the most puzzling case in the radar/visual
files. The apparently rational, intelligent behavior of the UFO suggests a
mechanical device of unknown origin as the most probable explanation.
"All factors investigated - geometric, psychological
and physical - appear to be consistent with the assertion that an extraordinary
flying object, silvery, metallic, disc-shaped, tens of meters in diameter, and
evidently artificial, flew within sight of two witnesses. " (11)
Following the recommendation of the University of Colorado,
Project Blue Book was ended in late 1969, after almost 22 years of Air Force
official investigations. It left behind approximately 12,500 case files, of
which 585 were officially declared "Unknown."
This means that the project staff felt it had sufficient
information about a case, but were unable to supply a full explanation of it.
Cases lacking sufficient information for meaningful analysis
were kept separate. Furthermore, an official memo was released years later,
under the Freedom of Information Act, that made it clear that "reports of
unidentified flying objects _which could affect national security... are not
part of the Blue Book system." [emphasis added].
Such reports "would continue to be handled through the
standard Air Force procedures designed for this purpose." (12)
In summary, it is apparent that the evidence - visual, radar
and physical - strongly suggests that more than mistaken observations of
conventional phenomena are involved in many UFO sightings.
Witness testimony, backed up by official U.S. government
documents, point toward the presence in the Earths atmosphere of apparently
manufactured craft that cannot be explained as mistaken observations of
acknowledged aircraft, spacecraft, atmospheric or astronomical phenomena.
The Case For Extraterrestrial UFOs
UFOs are not anything known, then they must be unknown.
What says "unknown" more powerfully than extraterrestrial?" In
the absence of any specific knowledge of even a single extraterrestrial
civilization, there are no constraints on theorizing about the nature,
technology and behavior of one or more hypothesized alien cultures.
But are UFOs extraterrestrial? Lacking proof, we must deal
very carefully with any answers. It remains a possibility that some or all of
the otherwise unexplained UFO reports will some day be explained in terms of
as-yet-unknown natural phenomena, or secret highly advanced man-made aircraft
and/or spacecraft.
Nevertheless, there are impressive reasons for speculating
about the extraterrestrial origin for some UFOs, namely their shapes and their
performance.
Shapes of UFOs
Most UFOs observed in daylight, when shapes and details can
be seen, have been described as having simple geometric shapes: discs, spheres,
cylinders and more recently, triangles.
Disc-shaped airplanes have been flown, but none is known to
have exceeded 150 mph, nor to have other capabilities displayed by UFOs.
Difficulties in stability and control have so far prevented any disc-shaped
aircraft from getting beyond the stage of low-performance prototypes.
Spherical aircraft have so far been limited to gas-filled
balloons, whose performance is at the bottom of the speed and maneuverability
scales. Balloons can fly only as the wind blows and can be overtaken quickly by
airplanes.
Cylindrical aircraft are unknown, as the lack of wings poses
huge problems when it comes to such functions as taking off and flying level.
Rockets and missiles are cylindrical and certainly are able to fly, but only as
the result of great power in relation to their size. They cn only fly upwards
up at launch, and on a ballistic curve on their way to a target.
Triangle is the shape of delta-winged airplanes, though the
flight characteristics of triangular UFOs removes them from this category.
It is entirely possible that some radical military aircraft
having one or more of these shapes are flying from super-secret test
facilities. But this would have to be a recent development unable to explain
sightings of such craft during most of the past 50 years.
Performance of UFOs
Even more striking than the shapes of UFOs is their
performance: speed, acceleration, maneuverability, silence.
Speed. UFOs have been tracked on military radar travelling
silently at several thousand miles per hour well within the Earth's atmosphere.
An airplane attempting this would create an inescapable sonic boom before
melting from friction with the air.
Extreme Acceleration. Airplanes do not visibly accelerate in
the air, though they show generally impressive acceleration during take-off.
Drag-racing cars and motorcycles accelerate in a manner obvious to even the
least experienced observer. In the case of
- 13 -
UFOs, airline and military pilots have reported that they
fly at the same speed as an airplane, and then display acceleration common only
to anti-missile missiles. Veteran pilots describe their observations with words
like "astounding" and "unbelievable."
Extreme Maneuverability. While airplanes can perform abrupt
maneuvers, these are generally seen only in air shows. Even then, such flying
is more often described by the outside observer as "graceful" rather
than "violent," though the pilot may use the latter term.
Impossibilities for airplanes (but not, apparently, for UFOs) include
right-angle turns at high speed, and zig-zag flight.
Silent Hovering. While helicopters and VTOL (Vertical
Take-Off and Landing) airplanes can hover, they produce noises whose quality
and volume positively identify them. UFOs, on the other hand, appear able to
hover with little or no motion for long periods without any sound. This remains
well beyond the state of known science, let alone technology.
Summary
The U.S. Government, and many other governments, claim that
although not all UFO reports can be explained, there is no evidence that Earth
has been visited by aliens. Most scientists and leading journalists agree with
this position.
However, these same scientists believe that there must be
many advanced civilizations on planets orbiting the billions of stars they
estimate to exist in the universe.
The gap between these two positions is generally explained
by the assumed inability of even the most advanced society to travel the
enormous distances separating the Earth from even the nearest stars.
Yet there are thousands of sightings of novel,
high-performance craft in our skies, reported by highly skilled and experienced
observers. There are also hundreds of other reports of craft seen on the
ground, and sometimes of humanoid beings in their vicinity.
The great conflict between official positions and
trustworthy observations constitutes the mystery of Unidentified Flying
Objects. A possible solution to this mystery is the suggestion that the
official position is based on an elaborate cover-up. If it is a cover-up, what
then is being protected, and by whom?
The answers to these questions generally focus on the issue
of national security as well as fear of the public reaction to an official
disclosure of UFO reality and its extraterrestrial origin.
The question of extraterrestrial intention and the
frightening aspects of the alleged abduction phenomena could be extremely
disturbing. However, many researchers believe that it is the science and
technology behind the national security veil which lies at the heart of the
secrecy, and that:
- fallen discs are being reverse engineered, repaired and/or
copied, and being tested;
- 14 -
- the technology is so advanced that we can barely imagine
the science behind it (which could be based on a fundamentally different
understanding of gravity and electromagnetic fields);
- whichever nation masters this extraordinary technology
will certainly be the most powerful nation on earth;
- in the opinion of those in control, the guarding of this
technology for defense purposes, far outweighs its potential value for other
purposes - i.e. a non-polluting, cost efficient solution to our present energy
and environmental crisis.
- 15 -
UFO
COVER-UP
There are two major elements to the UFO mystery: the UFOs
themselves and the intensive efforts by the governments of the world to
withhold information about them. Neither the nature nor the purpose of the
governments' actions are clearly understood. But this policy dates back to the
latter part of World War II when UFO-like "foo fighters" were being
reported by combat pilots.
A report about "foo-fighters" is said to have been
prepared in 1945 by the United States Eighth Air Force, but no copy has been
seen by the public, despite the passing of a half century. A year later, when
"ghost rockets" were seen over Scandinavia, the Swedish Government
invoked secrecy and only began to release information 40 years later.
When "flying saucers" appeared over the USA in the
summer of 1947, only the most general information was made public, while
reports and analyses were kept under wraps, as was the fact that the government
was taking the saucers seriously. (13, 14)
The U.S. Air Force ongoing UFO investigation (Project Sign,
Project Grudge, and Project Blue Book), collected more than 12,000 reports,
most of which were "explained." It was official policy to refuse to
comment on "unexplained" cases.
By keeping case details secret, the public was kept from
learning that many of the allegedly-explained cases had not been analyzed by
generally accepted scientific standards. (15)
In 1976, with the amendment of the Freedom of Information
and Privacy Act by the U.S. Congress, a mechanism was created for unearthing
government UFO information whose very existence had long been denied. Formal
requests, followed by appeals and sometimes legal action, produced thousands of
pages of previously-classified documents from the Air Force, Central
Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and other
intelligence-oriented agencies.
It appears, however, that the released information was the
least sensitive material in the official files. Almost all the released
documents had been classified merely "Confidential" or
"Secret," with just a few having been "Top Secret". Many
pages of these documents showed the black marks of censorship. In fact, many
pages of the voluminous case files of the official U.S. Air Force investigation
contained black marks hiding information. (16)
The rapid flow of UFO documents in the 1970s dropped to a
slow trickle in the 1980s, but will probably pick up again with the
Administration's recent declassification measures. However, since every
government agency has at its disposal a long list of reasons for
(11) Gillmor, Daniel S., ed., _Scientific Study of
Unidentified Flying Objects, New York Times Books, 1969.
(12) Bolender, Brig. Gen. C.H., USAF, Memo re Project Blue
Book, October 20, 1969.
- 12 -
Stareships
The mysterious wave of airship sightings that took place
over America in 1896 and 1897 were mirrored by a series of sightings that took
place in Britain, starting in 1909.
One of the first of these so-called 'scareship' sightings
occurred in the early hours of 23 March 1909, when PC Kettle from Peterborough
heard a strange buzzing sound from above. When he looked up, he saw a bright
light attached to an immense, oblong-shaped craft, which moved at a fairly high
speed across the sky. Numerous further sightings were reported.
On 13 May 1909 an airship of about 100 feet in length was
seen over Kelmarsh in Northamptonshire, while on the same night two men claimed
to have seen a landed airship on Ham Common in London and spoken to the two
crewmen, who they said were German and American. The German asked for some
tobacco for his pipe and the two witnesses reported having been blinded by a
searchlight during some of the sighting.
Another report of a landed airship concerned an event that
took place on 18 May 1909, on Caerphilly Mountain in South Wales. The witness
reported having seen two strangely-dressed occupants who he heard talking to
each other in a strange language that he was unable to identify. A subsequent
examination of the alleged landing site revealed some damage to the ground.
The public perception was that these were sightings of
German airships carrying out reconnaissance missions. But there is no
indication that Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin's airship programme was
sufficiently advanced in 1909 to conduct such operations over the UK. In any
case, German airships of the period could manage nothing remotely close to the
sorts of speeds and manoeuvres that were being reported.
The British airship programme was significantly less
advanced than the German one, so we do not believe that the 'scareship' mystery
can be explained in terms of prototype British military hardware with which
members of the public would be unfamiliar.
To this day these sightings remain unexplained. Further
information can be found in The Scareship Mystery - A Survey of Phantom Airship
Scares, 1909 - 1918, edited by Nigel Watson.
Our reason for mentioning these sightings is that they mark
the beginning of official interest in unexplained aerial phenomena. The 1909
wave was followed by further reports in 1912 and this is where our story begins
in earnest. There had been sightings of an airship over Sheerness in Kent and
with tension between Britain and Germany being so high, it was suggested that a
Zeppelin was involved.
On 27 November 1912 William Joynson-Hicks MP raised the
matter in Parliament and quizzed the First Lord of the Admiralty about the
events. The latter confirmed that reports had been received, but said that
subsequent investigation had not produced any explanation for what had been
seen. The First Lord of the Admiralty at the time was Winston Churchill.
Sightings continued throughout 1913 and one consequence of
this was the strengthening of the Aerial Navigation Act of 1911. A Bill was
duly passed which set up prohibited areas. If these were violated or if an
airship failed to respond to signals from the ground, it could then be shot
down and to enable this to be carried out, the War Office stepped up efforts to
produce a gun capable of bringing down an airship. The War Office continued to
investigate the 1913 sightings, but drew a blank.
While the media championed the theory that these sightings
involved German dirigibles, some newspapers suspected that hoaxes or hysteria
might be more logical explanations, especially in the cases of those reports
involving sightings of landed craft and occupants.
Crucially, however, the Government was not prepared to make
such a judgement and continued to take the view that all sightings should be
investigated. If there is evidence that your airspace is being penetrated by
aerial craft one does not ignore the data.
Whatever one's personal beliefs, anyone within government
and the military cannot ignore evidence of this nature and must assume that
they are hostile. If governments investigate such things and they turn out to
be bogus, all they lose is a little time and money.
But if they ignore something that turns out to be real and
hostile, they leave the country vulnerable, as well losing the opportunity to
exploit it (e.g. copying the technology).
This philosophy underpins official interest not just in UFOs
but in other areas such as remote viewing, so in a sense the War Office
response to the scareship mystery set the template for future official
investigations into UFOs.
written by Nick Pope
Ted Phillips' Physical Trace Catalogue
(These selections from the Ted Phillips Trace Catalogue
originally appeared in several editions of the Crop Watcher magazine.
and were compiled by British researcher, Paul Fuller.
Special thanks to Paul Fuller for allowing us to compile his
extracts into one article, and to Earth-Search.net
Ted Phillips' Physical Trace Catalogue
Earth-Search is a great place for information
the following cases from Ted Phillips' celebrated Physical
Trace Catalogue. The catalogue was published in 1975 by CUFOS and its
proper title is Physical Traces Associated with UFO Sightings, A Preliminary
Catalogue.
Ted Phillips was born in 1942 and has lived all his life in
Missouri. He is still alive today and his career in UFO research stretched from
the late 1960s to the mid 1980s. Phillips had a varied career and at various
times was an inspector for the Missouri State Highway Department, a
professional photographer and also an amateur jazz musician. According to
Ronald Story's UFO Encyclopedia Phillips investigated more than five
hundred UFO cases in his first twelve years of UFO research. His position
statement (written in the mid 1970s) concluded "I believe, after thirteen
years of investigation, [that] the data indicates a non-terrestrial
origin."
This summary is based on only a partial listing of the
catalogue as many of Phillips' cases appear extremely dubious in nature. Cases
from the early 1950s are particularly unreliable because many of the early UFO
books were written by people who automatically assumed that they were
describing encounters with alien spaceships. Jenny Randles tells me that cases
reported in the "hysterical" Spanish and South American media should
be treated even more skeptically because these cases were often complete
fabrications! Furthermore many of the early cases have no proper source, e.g.
Phillips quotes Vallee describing cases which appear to have been anecdotally
reported to Vallee. This means that we often have no idea whether or not a
specific case was investigated by anyone, let alone whether it was a
contemporary investigation or whether the investigator was in any sense someone
capable of undertaking an objective scientific evaluation.
In addition to these problems we have a major definitional
problem concerning cases which feature circular ground traces because of the
current confusion which exists over the authenticity of the archetypal crop
circle. Doug and Dave claimed to have actually created the phenomenon of a
sharply-defined swirled circle, but they apparently based their hoax on the
Tully reeds circles, which themselves were sharply-defined swirled circles.
Given this regrettable fact, what do we include in our definition of a crop
circle? Do we include roughly circular shapes of depressed but not swirled
circles or do we stick to sharp-edged circles? How about burned circles or
circles where the crop has been denuded or completely removed? Given these
problems its probably wise to merely highlight all cases involving circular
traces but not assume that they are necessarily caused by the same causal
mechanism. It is quite possible that there may be several natural
circle-forming mechanisms which all create different types of circular ground
trace. One of these mechanisms could still be Meaden's postulated plasma-vortex
but it is wise not to assume that any particular category of circular ground
trace must be caused by the postulated plasma vortex. In any event we will be
trying to track down case material referred to by Phillips and will report back
in a future issue.
Cases are listed in date order and each case has a unique
case number, the location, a brief summary and (usually) a primary source. Some
have local times noted. EARTH-SEARCH only have one copy of this
catalogue left so please do not write to them requesting copies of this case
material. EARTH-SEARCH can be contacted at EARTH-SEARCH.NET
Case 013: June 12th, 1790, FRANCE, Alencon. Time: 05.00
Several farmers caught sight of a large globe which was surrounded
by flames. A whistling sound was heard. The object slowed, made some
oscillations and moved toward the top of the hill, unearthing plants along the
slope. The heat was so intense that grass and small trees started burning. In
the evening the sphere was still warm. Witnesses: 2 mayors, a doctor, 3 other
authorities, in addition to the dozens of peasants who were present. A kind of
door opened and a person came out of it. The person was dressed in a strange
way, wearing a tight-fitting suit and, seeing all the people, said some words
that were not understood and ran into the woods. The sphere exploded silently,
throwing pieces everywhere, and these pieces burned until they were powder.
This report [is based on an earlier report made] on June 17, 1790, by Police
Inspector Liabeuf. Source: Vallee III, p60.
[PF Notes: This case has always attracted more than
the usual amount of skepticism, although we are not aware that it has been
exposed as a hoax. Quite a few of Vallee's original folklore cases were later
exposed as dubious or hoaxed, but this case sounds like something straight out
of Jules Verne - perhaps we have a retrospective hoax? Also, were there really
Police Inspectors in 18th century France? I thought Peel didn't found the first
police force in Britain until the 1830s so how can we have a French Police
Inspector in 1790?]
Case 683: 1842, U.S.S.R., Orenburg
"Small metal objects, perfectly hexagonal, fell out of
the sky after a 'strange cloud' was seen hanging over the town for a
considerable time" (UFOs from Behind the Iron Curtain, page 278).
[PF: Another weird case! Sounds a little bit like the
infamous First Fourth Norfolk Regiment that allegedly disappeared inside a
strange cloud during the siege of Gallipoli in 1916. This too was a retrospective
hoax that has only recently been admitted to. On the other hand Charles Fort's
books were full of 'strange clouds' that did peculiar things. Its a pity there
isn't more information. Difficult to evaluate.]
Case 006: Date Unknown. U.S.A., Silver City, NC.
The mystery circle, as it is called locally, has not for
many years produced plant growth. Transplanted grass has died. It is said that
insects, birds and animals avoid the area, which is a 40-ft circle. (Skylook)
[PF: This doesn't sound like a crop circle at all.]
Case 007: Date Unknown. U.S.A.
A Mrs Fulton saw an occupant with a large head as he sat
down on the rim of a round object. The object suddenly glowed and gave out rays
of yellow light. The bottom revolved anti-clockwise and the object rose
vertically at a high speed. It left the smell of hot pepper in the air. Three
weeks later every tree in the orchard was dead. (Personal files)
[PF: Another entity case which sounds very much like
a hoax. If there were physical traces - as alleged - why has this case not been
published elsewhere in the literature as a classic CEII/CEIII ?]
Case 008: Date Unknown. U.S.A. Darrington, WA.
UFO landed, bark on tree trunks damaged, trees spread
outward. No other details. (UFO-INFO).
[PF: Not enough detail to comment on really]
Case 014: December 7th, 1872. ENGLAND, Banbury. Time: 10.00
At King's Sutton an object resembling a haystack flew on an
irregular course. Sometimes high, sometimes low, it was accompanied by fire and
dense smoke, and produced the same effect as a tornado, felling trees and
walls. It vanished suddenly. (VALLEE III)
PF:
Phillips was perceptive to state that the King's Sutton event produced the same
effects as a tornado, as this event almost certainly was a tornado.
Alan Watson of Banbury decided to track down the original
newspaper accounts of this event. In doing so he contacted Banbury Library,
Oxfordshire County Council Leisure and Arts, and the Banbury Guardian/Central
Counties Newspapers Limited. The latter have given copyright permission for
Alan to reproduce these accounts in The Crop Watcher.
From the Banbury Guardian, 5 December, 1872, page 2
:-
Extraordinary Phenomenon Near King's Sutton
Great Destruction of Property and Narrow Escape of a Man
One of the most extraordinary things that perhaps ever fell
to our lot to chronicle took place near King's Sutton on Saturday, when Walton
Grounds, Astrop and Newbottle were visited by a phenomenon of a most remarkable
description, and which carried great destruction before it, tearing up
seventeen trees by their roots, damaging no less than thirty-six others,
throwing down 116 yards of stone wall, removing parts of the thatch of a hovel
and rick, and nearly resulting in a fatal accident to a man.
It appears that shortly before one o'clock on Saturday the
weather became very overcast and cloudy, with a heavy rainfall. There was a
vivid flash of lightning instantly followed by a loud thunderclap, and
immediately afterwards the phenomenon came upon the scene. An eye-witness says it
was "something in the shape of a haycock, accompanied with fire and dense
smoke, revolving through the air, making a noise similar to a railway train in
motion, but a great deal louder, and travelling much faster. Sometimes it was
high in the air, and sometimes near the ground." The first appearance of
the phenomenon seems to be upon Mr. Rogers' farm at Walton Grounds, where it
felled two or three trees. It proceeded from S.W., to N.E. and almost took a
straight line for some distance, but turned N.W., towards the end of its
career. In the field adjoining Mr. Rogers' farm, and which belongs to Sir
William Brown, a number of trees were struck, the limbs of some carried away,
the tops of others, and two completely torn up. After knocking down some rails,
three large elm trees skirting Mr. Cartwright's spinney were torn up and a
quantity of earth with them. There does not appear to have been any damage done
to the spinney, which is planted with ash poles, but it is something
extraordinary that on each side of it there has been much destruction.
A man named William Adams, who was breaking stones on the
road leading from King's Sutton to Newbottle, and just on the outside of the
spinney, says that he heard a whizzing noise coming through the spinney - a
noise like a train coming up - accompanied with dense smoke. Immediately he
heard a greater noise, and a tree that he had been standing under for shelter
for a short time before was torn up by the roots. Just before this took place,
he says there was a heavy shower of rain, and a vivid flash of lightning, which
frightened a boy who was working with him a few yards off, and at his request
he went with him, and he had no sooner reached him than the tree he had been
standing under was thrown down with great violence. Another tree on the same
side of the road, and but a short distance off, shared the same fate, and here
branches are scattered about in every direction.
On the opposite side of the road, a beech tree, said to be
one of the largest on Sir William Brown's estate, was torn up by the roots,
taking many tons of earth with it. The length of the earth facing the road
removed is about ten or eleven yards. An adjoining beech was split in two, one
portion being left standing. The thatching of a hovel near was disturbed, and
some cattle in the hovel were frightened, and rushed out into the field. A
little further on a large hedge has been thrown down, and the fire ball has
made great havoc at Newbottle Park, 116 yards or more of the wall of which was
thrown down. The wall is thrown down at intervals, and at one place seventy or
eighty yards of it had been razed to the ground. Some trees in the park were
struck, but it is strange that of a number of trees standing in a line, the
first was struck, the second and the third were not, whilst the fourth was. The
ball seems to have spent itself a short distance beyond Mr. Cartwright's
boundary wall, where the ground has been torn up, trees knocked down, and
branches scattered about for a considerable distance.
The people who saw the fire ball and watched its progress,
say they saw the last of it here, that it disappeared all at once, and there
was even no trace of smoke, nor did they hear an explosion of any kind. The
noise it made was, it is said, terrific, it being accompanied by a whirlwind
that carried everything before it, the smoke rose high in the air, and the
people thought the earth was about to open. Stones from Mr. Cartwright's wall,
several pounds in weight, were carried many yards, and some men at work a mile
away saw the contents of a pool carried away by the whirlwind. The distance
traversed by the ball was about two miles, and it will be seen that at the
outset of its career, it was no so destructive as towards the close.
Some of those who saw the phenomenon, to use their own
words, say, "there was as much smoke as would come from five or six
engines, but not much fire, and the noise it made was awful." It created
much consternation amongst them and one man rushed away from the place in a
state of great trepidation. The scene has been visited by numbers of people,
the phenomenon having, of course, caused much comment in the neighbourhood.
ANOTHER ACCOUNT
Sir, - May I ask you to insert the following account of a
curious atmospheric phenomenon which occurred here to-day!
About 12 o'clock we had a heavy storm of rain and hall, in
the middle of which was a very vivid flash of lightning, with almost
instantaneous thunder of a very peculiar rattling sound. About five minutes
after this, as I was leaving the house, my gardener called me to come quickly
and see the fireball. I was unfortunately half a minute too late, but I have
seen four persons who saw it from different points, and all agree they heard a
hissing roaring sound, like a passing train, which attracted their attention,
and then saw a huge revolving ball of fire travelling from six to ten feet off
the ground. The smoke was whizzing round and rising high into the air, and a
whirlwind accompanied it, carrying a cloud of branches along and destroying
everything in its way. The damage is very considerable - large trees bodily
uprooted - others broken off about ten feet from the ground, others with all
their branches snapped off; in one place a wall laid flat, and the remainder
knocked over at intervals, as if the wall had rebounded, and some of the stones
carried ten yards off. I rode this afternoon along the whole line of its
journey - about 2 miles in length. The direction was first from S.W. to N.E.,
and then it turned N.W. Where it first begun the breadth of ground travelled
over was very narrow, but increased as it proceeded, till in the last field the
debris covered a space quite 150 yards wide, and here it seems to have
exhausted itself, as all the witnesses agree that the ball of fire seemed to
vanish at this spot without any explosion. Here the ground had been out in
places as if by a cannon ball, but I could find no cause for this and I saw no
signs of fire on its route. One man, however, says there was a strong
sulphurous smell after it had passed.
[PF: The sulphurous smell is almost certainly the
mis-identification of ozone and nitrogen oxides - which are created by the
effect of electricity on air. Tornadoes which are highly electrically-active
are often reported as being accompanied by such smells.]
About the time of this occurrence my farm men at work about
a quarter of a mile in quite another direction saw the water of a pond carried
into the air by a whirlwind.
The wind was light all day from SS.E. My pocket aneroid
(made by Bryson, of Edinburgh) stood this morning at 28.48 [inches]. At this
moment it stands at 28.27, showing that the atmospheric disturbance has not yet
begun to subside.
I am yours obediently,
T. L. M. Cartwright,
Newbottle Manor, Banbury, Nov 30th, 1872
The Banbury Guardian ran a second article describing
the event in its 12 December edition (page 3) :-
THE LATE PHENOMENON NEAR KING'S SUTTON
As was to be expected, the phenomenon which lately occurred
at King's Sutton, and which we referred to at length last week, has attracted
the attention of a number of scientific gentlemen, and amongst them Mr. G. .
Symons, the eminent meteorologist, and Mr. Thomas Beesley, of Banbury, who
visited the neighbourhood last week, and after an enquiry extending over
several days, we understand they are of opinion that the place had been visited
by a cyclone. The appearance of fire is explained for by the friction of the
branches of trees caused by the rapid evolutions [sic (?) revolutions?] with
which they were carried through the air. Photographs have been taken of the
various damages, and in all probability the subject will be dealt with by Mr.
Symons in the Meteorological Magazine, of which he is the editor. On
Sunday four or five hundred persons visited the place, and every day adds to
the number of those who have been attracted to the spot, some of them coming
seventy or eighty miles.
THE GALE
Here as elsewhere on Sunday evening a terrific gale was
experienced, accompanied with heavy rainfall. Throughout the night the wind
never ceased, and fearful gusts blew occasionally - gusts of tremendous power
and force which seemed as if they would carry everything before them. In this
neighbourhood a good deal of damage was done. A large elm tree in front of the
Horton Infirmary was blown down, a popular in Prospect Terrace, another elm in
the Causeway, and walls in various places. The roofs of hovels and cottages
suffered considerably, the thatching of a cottage at Grimsbury being partially
removed, to the consternation of the occupants. Two trees were knocked down at
North Aston, knocking down telegraph posts and wires and creating other havoc.
The telegraphic communication was stopped, and the road was blocked up, so that
the mail from Woodstock was greatly behind time. The engine-shed at Bletchley
was blown down, doing much damage, but no person was injured."
On page 3 of the Banbury Guardian is a further item
:-
THE GALE
Oxford was visited on Sunday night by one of the most
violent gales which has been experienced for many years past, and considerable
damage has been to property. An extensive goods shed at the Great Western
Railway Station, which was approaching completion, was blown down, doing damage
to the extent of between two and three hundred pounds. It was 250 feet long,
and the walls were 20 feet high. They were built of brick, and were 14 inches
in thickness, with piers 18 inches thick, at intervals of 9 feet. There were 26
cast-iron girders in the building, all of which were smashed to pieces by the
fall of the walls. The contractor was Mr. Bishop of Reading. Several signal and
telegraph posts have been blown down on the Great Western line near Oxford, but
fortunately the telegraph wire had not been broken. At Christ Church about 60
feet of the ornamental parapet wall over the Vice-Chancellor's residence was
blown on the lead roof, which was seriously damaged thereby. Some of the
University barges on the Thames were driven from their moorings, and rafts were
sunk. Two or three of the large elms in the avenue known as the Broad Walk,
were blown down, and large branches of other broken off. The end wall of a
house at Cowley St. John fell, but fortunately the occupants escapen [sic]
unhurt. Garden walls in several places fell, and some ornamental stonework was
blown off from All Saints College. A large number of chimney pots and slates
from roofs were also blown off, but fortunately, so far as we can learn, no
accident [to persons] has occurred."
The Banbury Guardian goes on to refer to damage at
St. Aldgate's Church, where the tower has already been demolished, and to the
Spire of All Saints Church, which has been left in a "very dangerous
condition". There is also an account of the earlier tornado from the Pall
Mall Gazette, which is quoted in full :-
There has been an extraordinary, and, it may be added,
singularly unpleasant atmospheric phenomenon near Banbury. About one o'clock in
the afternoon "something in the shape of a haycock and of great size"
was seen revolving through the air. At first people naturally thought it was
the "Claimant," but speedily to their cost discovered that it was
something even more alarming and mysterious. It was accompanied by fire and
smoke, and sometimes was high up in the air and at other times close to the
ground. Its noise was terrible, and resembled that of an express train running
with extreme rapidity. It tore up no fewer than seventeen trees, injured
thirty-six more, and threw down 116 yards of stone wall, besides frightening
everybody out of their wits. For a mile and a half this disagreeable thing,
whatever it was, pursued its destructive career, and was accompanied in its
progress by a whirlwind almost as mischievous as itself, for this latter
nuisance, it is stated, swept everything before it - dried up a pond over which
it passed, carried stones for a distance of forty yards, and knocked down hosts
of railings. Altogether a more troublesome couple than the thing like a haycock
and its attendant whirlwind have rarely visited a quiet neighbourhood, nor are
we surprised to hear that the inhabitants thought "the earth was about to
open and swallow them up." It is a touching trait in the character of this
simple folk that in the hour of peril they were fully prepared to share the
fate of the Banbury cakes which have made their district so famous. -- Pall
Mall Gazette
Commentary
David Reynolds of the U.K.-based TORRO (Tornado and
Storm Research Organization) tells me that this event is recorded as two
separate and definite tornado events in the TORRO tornado database. The case is
noticeable for the extraordinary damage reported - particularly to the newly
constructed railway shed at Oxford and to the 116 yards of stone wall. The
event involved typical tornado acoustics - "a railway train in
motion", "a whizzing noise", "a noise like a train"
and the tornado sometimes hovered and sometimes touched the ground surface. The
"fireball" gave off a "hissing, roaring" sound and was
revolving rapidly. The "smoke" effect may simply have been a
misperception of swirling water condensation inside the vortex funnel. The
original account in the Banbury Guardian cites the tornado sucking away
the contents of a small pond. Of course this is a clue to cases where small
fish are seen to fall from the sky. Finally we see how some members of the
local population interpreted what they saw in a religious sense, thinking that
"the Claimant" (the devil?), was responsible for the phenomenon. This
is not unusual but is more typical of accounts of medieval tornadoes, rather
than those of the 19th century.
Many thanks to Alan Watson for his research and
thoughtfulness in sending us this superb account. - Paul Fuller
Case 015: July 1880. CANADA, East Kent, Ontario.
David Muckle and W.R. McKay heard a sudden loud report. They
turned to see a cloud of stones flying upward from a spot in a field. They
examined the spot, which was circular and about 16 ft. across. There was no
sign of an eruption nor anything to indicate the fall of a heavy body there.
The ground was simply swept clean. (Scientific American, July 10, 1880).
[PF: This is the classic case discussed in all our
work as an early account of a sudden explosive vortex creating a circular
ground trace. It is listed along with other accounts of explosive vortex events
in Corliss' Tornados, Dark Days and Anomalous Precipitation]
Case 040: September 27, 1950. U.S.A. Philadelphia, PA.
Police officers John Collins and Joseph Kennan saw an object
6 ft. in diameter float to earth in an open field. They approached the object
with flashlights. Collins tried to pick the object up, the part touched by his
hand dissolved leaving a stick, odourless residue. Within a half hour the
entire object had evaporated. A spot remained at the site. (News slips).
[PF: This sounds to me more like some kind of
industrial pollutant rather than a spaceship! Jenny Randles has informed me of
some fascinating work by Louis Frank (summarised in a paper by Frank, Sigworth
and Craven, International Geophysical Research Letters, 1986). Frank was
intrigued by abnormally high water vapour levels in the upper atmosphere as
well as by UFO reports and reports of strange things falling out of the sky. He
postulated that every day the earth's atmosphere is struck by thousands of mini
comets - comets composed of inter-stellar ice but only a few metres in size.
Such comets would presumably evaporate in the upper atmosphere, where they
might be mistaken for UFOs. A few might conceivably reach the lower atmosphere
where they might behave in the manner described in this case. Frank's
controversial theory has been widely debated in the scientific press and has
attracted a good deal of skepticism. I've not heard of Frank's theory before so
perhaps it is wise to reserve judgement.]
Case 047: 1952 U.S.A., Lamonte, MO.
Former director of the Sedalia ASCS office was contacted by
Joe Thompson and asked to look at an unusual area on his farm which had
appeared overnight. He found a perfect circle 16 ft. across with the plants
wilted and dead. The soil was examined and no cause could be found. (Personal
files).
[PF: Another inconclusive case]
Case 815: June 1952. U.S.A. Little Spring Creek, TN
Marks of legs and center spike in chirt (sic), along
with small heelless footprints. Around 11 p.m. man hears strange sounds and
weird music, sees a shiny thing on the ground, with bright lights coming through
an open door. 4 or 5 men, 4.5 to 5 ft. tall dancing and singing in high-pitched
voices. Object aluminium coloured, glowing orange and blue in spots, some of
which were too bright to look at directly. Rotating lights on translucent ball
at top. Object on 4 legs, each with a ball at the end, and a center spike.
Stood 3-4 ft. off the ground, 7-8 feet thick at center, like 2 saucers stuck
together. Men reloaded object, advanced toward witness with things in their
hands that looked like guns, but stopped, apparently unwilling to cross a
creek. men walked up ramp or steps into object, which rose vertically in a
twisting, cork-screw motion, glowing brighter as it rose. (Stanley L. Ingram
"Recent Sightings" page 65 in Unidentified Flying Objects Over the
Tennessee Valley by W.A. Darbro and Ingram, South Publishing Co.,
Huntsville, Ala. 1974. Via Fred Merritt).
[PF: Well! This is a classic early close encounter
case that exceeds the boggle threshold by some way. I don't like single witness
entity cases, particularly ones where the entities, despite having travelled
from goodness-knows-where, were incapable of crossing a creek? It could so
easily turn out to be a hoax .]
Case 704: July 15th, 1952. GERMANY, Gleimershausen.
Former Mayor Oskar Linke and his 12-year-old stepdaughter
saw a landed circular object and occupants. Witnesses moved to within 30 ft.
Object was 50 ft. across with two rows of holes along the side, each about 1
ft. in diameter. A black cylindrical tower was seen at the top center; it was about
10 ft. high, went through the disk and the object was resting on it. Object
slowly ascended, whistling sound was heard. Several people in a nearby village
saw it flying overhead. A circular depression where the tower had rested was
found. (The New York Enquirer. 07-21-52).
[PF:. Another awkward case. Its difficult to come to
a rational solution unless we conclude that "it can't be therefore it
isn't"!]
Case 676: August 6th, 1952. U.S.A., Lumberton, NC. Time:
21.00
James J. Allen, 51, saw a round object 8 ft. long, 6 ft.
high land within 10 ft. of him. Small occupant seen. Footprints found. (The
Robesonian, Lumberton, 08-07-52).
[PF:. Not really enough information here. ]
Case 052: May 20th, 1953. U.S.A., Brush Creek, CA. Time:
18.30
A miner, John Q. Black, saw a silvery disk, 7 ft. in
diameter and 6 ft. thick land on a sandbar within 50 ft. of the witness. He saw
a creature about the size of a midget get out of the craft, scoop up water in a
shiny pail and hand it inside. The witness and his partner John van Allen saw
marks in the sand about 1 ft. wide that looked like "elephant feet".
(The Humanoids, p. 146)
Case 051: May 30th, 1953. NEW ZEALAND, Christchurch.
White filaments seen coming to ground at time of UFO
sighting. (Stringfield).
Case 826: June 20th, 1953. U.S.A., Brush Creek, CA. Time:
18.30
Incident identical to that of May 20th, 1953. (Humanoids)
[PF: The standard explanation for these "Angel
Hair" cases is that spiders' cobwebs have coalesced and then
disintegrated. The only real question is how the spiders' webs coalesce at
cloud level].
Case 053: June 24th, 1953. U.S.A., Hampton Bay, NY. Time:
00.18
Woman saw a round object 100 ft. in diameter. Lighted red
band around the middle, oscillating motion. Noise similar to swarm of bees.
Four portholes seen in top section along with red lights. Seen for 3 minutes.
Two days later a yellowish moss was observed at the site. Object hovered over
water. (VALLEE III).
[PF: I think it was John Keel who first drew
attention to the "swarm of bees" sound frequently heard during close
encounter cases. The trace is not very typical of a CEII and may not even be
related to the object seen.]
Case 054: July 2nd, 1953. SPAIN, Villares des Saz. Time:
13.00
Maximo Munes Olivares, 14, saw a "big balloon" on
the ground when a faint whistling sound attracted his attention. It was
metallic. Three dwarfs emerged, they were dressed in blue. they re-entered the
object, which glowed very brightly, made a soft whistling sound and went off
"like a rocket". Footprints and four holes 2 in. deep forming a
perfect square of 14 in. were found by police. (VALLEE III)
[PF:. Another single witness entity case. Don't
forget Jenny's comments about a "hysterical" Spanish UFO press. The
traces - even the case itself - may have been fabricated by the witness or the
newspaper.]
Case 055: August 17th, 1953. MEXICO, Ciudad Valles. Time:
18.00
Salvidor Villanueva, 40, noted failure in his auto engine.
As he tried to make repairs he was approached by two men, 4 ft. tall wearing
gray coveralls and carrying helmets. An object 40 ft. across, disc-shaped with
a dome and humming sound was seen. It ascended vertically at high speed. Bushes
and sticks were found broken at the site. This formed a circle 40 to 45 ft.
across. (FSR 1-70)
[PF: Sounds more like a hoax to me !]
Case 056: August 18th, 1953. U.S.A., Ashboro, NC.
Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Dixon found a perfect 18 ft. circle in
their front yard. The circle had a substance that appeared to be some kind of
powder and had a burned odour, although it did not kill or scorch the grass. (George
Fawcett)
[PF: Again not very convincing evidence of a crop
circle]
Case 057: September 4th, 1953. FRANCE, Tennerre. Time: 21.30
A woman saw two objects on the ground and 3-5 ft. tall men
running towards the object. They had large heads and wore helmets and boots.
One entered the elongated object which was 18 ft. wide. It took a vertical
position resting on a tripod and took off with a spherical object into which
the other two creatures had gone. Traces were found. (Vallee III).
Case 059: November, 1953. NORWAY, Gjersjoen Bridge.
Mr. Tygve, Mrs. Buflot and a neighbour saw an object rose
from behind a hill and follow their car, stopping ahead of them just above the
ground. They stopped, and felt "pricklings" until the craft took off
vertically. A watch stopped working, and numerous people vouch for the fact
that the paint on the car changed from beige to dark green. (Vallee III).
[PF: This sounds a promising case. The
"pricklings" may well be due to the presence of static electricity.
There are numerous cases on record where the UFO followed a vehicle - this
could be because the car was electrically charged by the proximity of a natural
electro- magnetic field. There are also plenty of cases where car bodies
apparently changed colour, although it is not really clear if this was just a
temporary illusion (eg at night) or a real effect witnessed in daylight. We'll
try and find out more details.
Case 061: December, 1953. CANADA, Sherbrook, NS.
Witness saw two "indescribable" shadows, a while
later a large round object took off some 350 ft. away with a blue-green light.
Police found broken bushes as evidence of an enormous weight. Animals reacted.
(Vallee III)
Case 062: 1954. MEXICO.
A flying object was witnessed by many citizens. It was
watched by all at a distance of less than 50 ft. until it finally left, leaving
behind a circle of flattened corn. To date nothing grows in the circle. (Data-Net)
[PF: At last, something which sounds like a crop circle!
We will be trying to find more information on this case for a future issue. The
lack of a precise date and location is not very encouraging. It could be the
"1953" case we published in our historical list in CW14]
Case 063: 1954, CANADA, Vivian.
Circular area devoid of plant growth to date (1971). (H.H.
McKay)
[PF: Again this doesn't sound like crop circles as we
have come to know and love them .]
Case 662: January 4th, 1954. FRANCE,
Marignane Airport. Time: 21.00 Witness saw a round object
landing, trace found. (MUFOB)
Case 663: February 1954. U.S.A., San Bernardino, CA. Time:
19.00
Engineer A.P. Wheeler driving when he saw a metallic object
resting on the road ahead. He stopped 10m from it. The object was a disk on
which a hatch was seen. Object ascended disturbing gravel below. Object
disappeared in 30 seconds. (MUFOB)
Case 789: May 20th, 1954 ENGLAND, Bruton, Somerset. Time:
02.00
Nigel Frapple, cycling home from a dance, saw first a
terrific light in a field and then a huge circular metallic object, 50 ft.
across, with a brilliant flame-coloured light coming from a central cockpit,
hovering 20 ft. above the ground about 80-100 ft. away. After a minute it moved
off towards the northwest, climbing and increasing speed. There was a slight
swishing sound heard. The same sort of object was seen near Ringwood in
Hampshire the same night. The next day Mr. Frapple and a reporter examined the
field and found "grass pushed flat in an area 100 ft. in diameter, and
scorched in places". (The Humanoids)
[PF: This is one of the early classic crop circle
cases, often referred to as the Redlynch case. Like many of the earlier case
the trace was in grass, thus disqualifying it as a crop circle according to
some researchers]
Case 065: June 21st, 1954. CANADA, Ridgeway, Ontario. Time:
01.00
Mr. & Mrs. Guy Baker reported a round object some 50 ft.
in diameter. They reported a dome and multi-coloured lights. The Baker car
would not start during the observation. There was a large, brown circular area
where the object was seen. (VALLEE III)
[PF: Again, probably not a crop circle, but
interesting nevertheless.]
Case 097: December 12th, 1954. BRAZIL, Campinas.
A lady observed three UFOs, dull gray, emitting a strong
light as they dived low over her house. A liquid substance dropped from one,
like a silver rain. She ran to the spot where it had fallen and found a
brilliant glowing stain, spread over the cement near the washing tank. The
stain was quite hot. The material was analysed by Chief Chemist, Dr. Visvaldo
Maffei, Young Laboratories, 584 Francisco Deodoro Street, Campinas. "The
sample analysed is a combination of chemically pure tin-88.91 % and
oxygen-11.09 %." (FSR)
[PF:This is another peculiar case which sounds
potentially explicable. We'll get back to you on this one!]
Case 098: December 19th, 1954. VENEZUELA, Valencia.
Jose Parra, an 18-year-old jockey was training when he saw
six small men loading rocks into a disc hovering near the ground. He tried to
run but a violet-coloured beam from a device held by one of the men stopped
him. Footprints were found. (FSR)
Case 099: December 29th, 1954. FRANCE, Bru. Time: 21.00
A Mr. Gamba saw an oval red object 175 ft. away. When he
tried to approach it, he found he was unable to move. As soon as this "paralysis"
subsided, he ran to get his brothers and came back to the object, which turned
white, then red. It rose and flew away toward the east. It had been on the
ground at least 15 minutes. Traces were found, as if the ground had been dug
up. Small trees near the river were found damaged, as if they had been cut with
a knife. (VALLEE III)
Case 101: 1955, U.S.A., Elking, AK.
Frank Huson reported the following incident which took place
on his farm. After a heavy rain, 'I walked up to an almost perfect circle,
which was formed by the peculiar disposition of the dead weeds that had been
uprooted. Inside this circle, no weeds stood at all. The uprooted weeds, where
they were thick, were lying along the outer rim of the circle, against the
weeds that were still standing, as if they had been pulled up, and moved by
some force. The ground was soft, and there were no marks showing that anything
had sat down there. This circle was about 25 ft. across. (Lucius Farish)
[PF: What an intriguing case. What a pity it only
involves weeds rather than mature vegetation. It would be very easy to read too
much into this case so again we will try to find out more before coming to a
conclusion.]
Case 790: March 30th, 1955. U.S.A., near Tuscon, AZ. Time:
03.15
Andy Florio, a musician, was driving from Tuscon to El Paso
on Highway 80 when he saw a "disc-machine "... at least 100 ft. in
diameter, 25 ft. thick, dirty gold or bronze with circular openings around its
rim from which amber-coloured lights protruded. Bluish-green lights were
"shining and flickering upward" from its roof. "It made the
sound of electrical humming with stronger and softer volume. It yawed, swayed
back and forth and turned over on its axis once as I stood out of my car on the
driver's side ... It tipped over on its side and shot a brilliant, blinding
white-coloured beam of light at me, bubbling the dome of the paint on the car
as well as burning my elbow." Mr. Florio felt a needle-like tingling
sensation and heat all over his body and nausea a few weeks later. The radio
stopped, lights dimmed and the motor chugged at a speed of 12-15 miles an hour
"as though it might stall any second." When he arrived at a garage in
El Paso the next afternoon, "half the acid was gone from the battery, I was
running on three plugs, and my radio was burned out completely." (Modern
People, Oct. 27, 1974 and personal communication to CUFOS)
[PF: This is a good CEII report with valuable clues
about the nature of the natural energy forces involved. Again note the
reference to a "tingling" sensation and the affect on the car
bodywork. We will be searching for more information about this case and will
report back on what we find.]
Case 521: July 22nd, 1955. U.S.A., Cincinnati, OH. Time:
17.30
Mr E.M. had been mowing his lawn and kneeled down near a
peach tree, when suddenly "a peculiar liquid substance dark red in colour
began pelting me and the tree". He looked up and saw a pear-shaped object
about 1000 ft. high moving slowly from west to east. As he watched, his hands
and arms began to burn painfully, but washing them immediately eased the pain.
When Mr. M. went out and examined the peach tree the next day, he found that
most of the leaves had turned brown and fallen, the twigs and limbs were
brittle, the peaches seemed "petrified" and the trunk had turned so
hard that a nail could be driven in only with great difficulty. The grass below
the tree had also died. (C.R.I.F.O. Orbit, Sep 2, 1955)
Case 105: August 6th, 1955. U.S.A., Bedford, Indiana.
Semicircular imprints. (NICAP)
Case 251: October 1955. AUSTRALIA, Port Augusta;
Case 107: October 2nd, 1955. U.S.A., Uhrichsville, OH;
Case 108: October 10th, 1955. U.S.A., Cincinnati, OH
Case 109: October 27, 1955. U.S.A., Cincinnati, OH.
All listed as White filaments seen falling to ground at time
of UFO sighting. (Stringfield)
[ PF: More "Angel Hair" spiders' cobwebs]
Case 111: 1956. FRANCE.
Circular trace found.
Case 110: 1956, U.S.A., Stover, MO.
A bright light was seen ascending from a wooded area. When
neighbours investigated, they found the ground blackened in a circular area 56
ft. across. Several small trees were broken and pushed outward from the
blackened area. In 1968 a bright light was seen again in the same place.
(Personal files)
Case 706: Summer, 1956. U.S.A., Nellis Air Force Base, NV.
Gear marks in triangular pattern, individual impressions
similar to Case 247. 100 ft. diameter domed disk with three circular landing
gear. Car stopped. (Lorenzen, Coral
and Jim, Flying Saucer Occupants
Signet, New American Library, N.Y., 1967, page 29. Via Fred Merritt)
Case 112: Fall, 1956. U.S.A., Bethel, CT.
Danti Vaghi and a friend found a circle of grass 18 ft. in
diameter in a field just off Federal Road C. In the center, a 3 ft. circle of
grass stood intact. Around the outside of the burned area, the grass still
contained traces of nickel and chromium. (Bethel Home News, 11-25-69)
[PF: Some confusion exists in the UFO literature over
the alleged "burning" inside circles. This is sometimes wrongly
assumed when plants rot and turn black. It would be interesting to find out who
analysed the grass and found such interesting metals. Were these metals already
present before the circle was formed? We'll be trying to track down more
information]
Case 124: Nov 16, 1958. SWEDEN, Upland. Dusk.
Two men found their car stopping and lights going out when
they were three miles from Vaddo, their destination. In the next moment they
caught sight of a shining object, about 17 yards long and 8-9 yards high, which
swooped down from their right and landed about 60 yards away. It was circular
and blue, with a shining yellow rim which lit up a circular area of 90-100
yards. After about three minutes on the ground, the object begun to move, then
vanished into the air. After checking their car, which now started easily, the
men drove to the spot where the "light" had been. They noticed a
heaviness and "closeness" of the air, and saw that the grass was
either pressed down or blown down . When they lighted the area with a flashlight,
they discovered a bright, flat, thin "stone", which felt warm to
their hands. (CUFOS)
[PF: This case was featured on page 159 of Crop
Circles, A Mystery Solved as a potential plasma-vortex case. Note the
reference to the unusual atmospheric sensations. This too is a clue to the
natural origin of the effect being described. We suggest that the failure of
the car engine is due to intense ionisation of the air.
Case 126: December 20th, 1958. FRANCE, Clermont-Ferrand.
1600 Hrs.
A disc 70 foot in diameter was observed and caused damage to
the ground. (VALLEE III)
Case 127: December 28th, 1958. IRELAND, County Antrim.
Joseph Bennett, a farmer, heard a strange noise and he
looked up and saw a dark, round object 7 feet in diameter about 20 foot above
the ground. It travelled NW and went above a row of trees. A 40 foot high oak
tree, 2 foot in diameter was knocked to the ground, 8 foot above the surface. (VALLEE
III)
Case 128: 1959. U.S.A., Turner, ME.
A woman was in her driveway when she heard a humming sound.
She glanced across the road and saw strange lights flying low over a field
about 1,000 foot away. The object [sic] hovered and descended to the ground;
the lights went out. Another object [sic] crossed the field and hovered above
the landed UFO. The objects were disk-shaped with blue lights around a central
rim. The landed object ascended and the two flew away at high speed. A small
area of singed grass was found the next morning. (John Fuller, Incident at
Exeter)
[PF: It is interesting to compare the behaviour and
appearance of these UFOs with those mentioned in the Upland case - both were
disc-shaped with brilliantly lit rims, and both landed on the ground for a
minute or two. The Turner case was part of a more complex sequence of UFO
events spanning several weeks but in this particular case the witnesses were
obviously too far away to experience any of the effects described in the Upland
case.]
Case 129: 1959. DENMARK, Kolding. Midnight.
"Sucking marks" found in the snow. Farmer Nielsen
reported a strange light in his field. (FSR)
[PF:OK then readers, what kind of light leaves
"sucking marks" ? How about one generated by some obscure vortex
mechanism surrounded by an electro-static field of some kind?]
Case 130: May 20th 1959. ARGENTINA, Tres Lomas.
Two hunters saw a disc-shaped object on the ground 500 feet
away. It appeared to be aluminium and about 9 foot high with a dome. Grass was
flattened. (VALLEE III)
[PF:An intriguing case. How much of the description
is objectively reported and how much is conditioned by witnesses cultural
stereotype of what they are supposed to be seeing ?]
Case 131: July 23rd, 1959. NEW ZEALAND, Piri Piri.
Ring shaped trace. (UFOIC).
Case 686: August 1959. U.S.S.R., Georgia.
In the vicinity of an unnamed village in Georgia, a UFO was
said to have exploded, the event being witnessed by a 43-year-old labourer
Vasily Dubischev. There were no remains apart from one strangely charred piece.
A certain Dr. Fyodor Petrov was said to have claimed it was not made of carbon
but silicon. (UFOs from behind the Iron Curtain page 282, quoting Robert
Charroux, Le Livre Des Mondes Oubliques, Paris 1971).
[PF: If memory serves me correctly this case was
later admitted to be a hoax.]
Case 132: August 12th, 1959. SPAIN, Brion.
A 60-year-old farmer saw an egg-shaped object come down at
high speed and land in a field near a river. It took off vertically, with an
engine noise, not similar to a helicopter. Traces [found]. (VALLEE III)
Case 133: September 7th, 1959. WALLINGFORD, KY. 0230 Hrs.
Disc shaped object hovered near the ground, took off
vertically, moved away horizontally. A 13 foot stained ring was found. A
spectro-analysis of the soil of the ring shows the sample contained chromium,
iron and manganese not normally found in the clay soil of the area. (The UFO
Investigator, March 1960).
[PF: If this case can be counted as a crop circle
then it was one I didn't know about. We'll certainly try to track down more
information about it and report back.]
Case 134s: October 1959. SWEDEN, Mariannelund. 1855 Hrs.
The electrical power in the three witnesses' houses failed;
when they ran outside they saw a blinding white light, it stopped and hovered.
The object started to move, slowly descended and turned to the right, hitting
and smashing a portion of a maple tree (top section), it then descended towards
the ground. The witness was 10 foot from it. Through a large window he could
see two occupants, with large eyes; the heads were high-crowned. The occupants
were small in size. The object was oval, about 12 feet long and 8 feet high. It
was found that a gray-white substance covered power lines. The witness was
Gideon Johansson, his wife and his son. (FSR, 11:70) .
Case 736: 1960. ROMANIA, Baciu.
Imprints in a triangle, 3.2m x 2.4m x 2.4m, burnt grass. (Skylook)
Case 135p: April 12th, 1960. U.S.A., Lacamp, LA. 2100 Hrs.
A witness reported a disc, red in colour, flying swiftly
from the south. It touched the ground about 1,000 feet away with a loud
explosion heard by many people. A flame was seen. It bounced in an easterly
direction, ascended, turned west and disappeared. The ground was scarred in
nine places and a substance like metallic paint was found.
(Science &
Mechanics)
Case 136: May 14th, 1960. BRAZIL, Paracura. 0400 Hrs,
A witness saw two landed discs on a beach, and several
small, pale-looking humanlike entities standing near them. They beckoned to the
witness, who turned and fled in fright. Returning later with other men he found
marks in the sand where the discs had rested. (APRO).
[PF: I find this case dubious in the extreme. Don't
you?]
Case 137: May 24th, 1960. VENEZUELA, Ocumare del Tuy.
Diamond-shaped scorched marks found. (NICAP)
Case 138: June 10th, 1960. ENGLAND, Evenlode.
Two circles [ie rings, PF], one inside the other,
were discovered by Bill Edwards. The outer circle [ring, PF] is 23 foot
across. Smaller ring 16 foot across, width 1.5 inches. (FSR 10:60)
[PF: This is the classic Evenlode case discussed in
all our published work.]
Case 139: July 22nd, 1960. U.S.A., Martin, TN/ 2200 Hrs.
Shirley Sisk, aged 13, saw a hovering disc with a small
rudder- like attachment on one side. Large oily circles with a black substance
were found. (Saucers, Space & Science, Canada)
Case 140: August 1960. ARGENTINA, 1030 Hrs.
Four Italian engineers saw a luminous disc land or hover
close to the ground. It was 1,000 feet away. It then ascended and a circular
area of grass 90 foot in diameter was found. (FSR)
Case 149: 1962. CANADA, Wooler, Ontario.
25 foot circle was found, formed by an 18 inch ring. No
other details. (H.H. McKay)
[PF: Here's another historical case which could be a
fairy ring or a crop circle. I'll try and find out as much as possible for a
future article.]
Case 150: 1962. U.S.A., Minot, ND.
A witness was driving from Grand Forks to Minot when an
object flew across in front of her car and followed it. The next day a
bowl-shaped imprint in which all the grass was crushed was found. Three
indentations were clearly marked within the depressed area. Plants and grass
had radiation of the subterranean roots. (Data- Net).
Case 151: 1962. ARGENTINA, Bahia Blanca.
Three truck drivers saw a luminous object ahead of them. It
remained on the ground for one minute. Where the object had been they found a
wet, greyish substance. (FSR 10:62)
Case 152: May 12th, 1962. ARGENTINA, Pampa Province. 0410
Hrs.
V. and G. Tomasini and H. Zenobi saw an object on the ground
350 feet away. It looked like a railroad car and was illuminated. As they
approached it, the object ascended, crossed low over the road, rose with a
flame and separated into two sections that flew away in separate directions. A
humming noise was heard. It was seen on the ground for one minute. A circle was
burned, insects were carbonized and the ground was petrified. (VALLEE III)
[PF: Could the humming noise been due to an
electro-static field ? The "circle" could have been caused by
considerable air pressure inside the vortex. Or do you have any better ideas?]
Case 153: May 24, 1962 ARGENTINA, La Pampa.
Woman saw an object on the ground with two robot-like
creatures. Grass singed in a circle 18 ft. wide. (FSR 10-62)
Case 154: May 24, 1962. VENEZUELA, Ocumare, del Tuy.
Diamond-shaped marks, scorched. (NICAP)
Case 155: July 30, 1962. ARGENTINA, Bajeola Grande.
Roberto Mievres, 17, was riding his motorcycle when a tall
being appeared as the engine stalled. The being snatched the boy's scarf, the
boy ran away and came back with a group of people. They found the scarf on the
ground and discovered traces and observed an unknown object flying away. (VALEE
III).
[PF: The evidence here rests a great deal on whether
the group of people were known to the witness prior to the encounter and how
long the witness had to fabricate the traces.]
Case 488: November 21, 1963. ENGLAND, Sandling Estate
[Kent].
Keith Croucher, 17, saw a solid oval light in the center of
a golden mist crossing a football pitch. Two nights later, John McGoldrick and
a friend went to Sandling Woods to investigate. "They found a vast expanse
of bracken that had been flattened;" they also found three giant
foot-prints, clearly defined, 1 inch deep, 2 foot long and 9 inches across. (The
Humanoids).
[PF:. A very famous case. Does anyone know if it was
ever exposed as a hoax ?]
Case 164: December 27, 1963. ENGLAND, Epping. 16.00 Hrs.
Pauline Abbott, a trainee riding instructor, saw on the
ground a white object 8 foot long, 3 foot thick at the center, tapering to a
point at both ends, glowing slightly. A window on one side glowed brighter than
on the other. A "squelching noise" was heard as the object rose in a
shallow climb and flew horizontally for 100 feet before it was hidden from
view.
Marks "like three large fingerprints pushed together
into mud" were found, forming a square with 8 foot sides within an 11 foot
circular depression which contained a 3 foot central circle. Grass was found
flattened. These marks were only 150 foot away from the site of Case No 123, in
1958. (Vallee III and Eileen Buckle in The Scoriton Mystery via
Fred Merritt).
[PF: Well following John Barrett's lecture at
BUFORA's 25th birthday party I know that anything connected with the Scoriton
mystery is probably a hoax.]
Case 165: 1964. CANADA, Ballantrae, Ontario.
Claus Slade and a friend found an area 50 foot in diameter
cleared. At the outer edge of the circle [a ring, PF] the ground was
seared to a crisp, leaving bits of charcoal. The outer circle [a ring? PF]
was about 3 foot wide. Five years later, no vegetation grows. Above the circle,
tall 100 foot high oak trees still grow, but the branches which hung over the
circle are dead. It is estimated [that] the time of the landing was June, 1964,
as numerous UFOs were reported in that area. (UFORC)
[PF: So just because "numerous" UFOs were
reported in June the trace just HAD to be related, didn't it!]
Case 166: 1964. U.S.A., West Unity, OHIO.
Rings of sterile soil, located near a tree line and in the
corners of a field. (Brent Raynes)
Case 681: April 23, 1964. U.S.A., Rivesville, WV.
Mrs Ivah Frederick observed a landed object for 15 minutes
600 foot away. It was a disc with dome, revolving clockwise and humming. A
central la ding shaft was seen and a human-like figure 3 to 4 foot tall.
Ascended vertically, 3 foot circular imprint found (shaft) and footprints 6 to
8 inches long with four toes. (NICAP).
Readers will know that in issues 16-18 of The Crop
Watcher I re-published selected cases from Ted Phillips' well-known
catalogue of alleged physical ground traces associated with unidentified flying
objects. The purpose of doing so was to draw attention to alleged historical
accounts of crop circles as well as to examine whether Meaden's atmospheric
vortex theory can be applied to explain some of the more challenging UFO
reports.
I think readers will agree with me when I state that many of
the early cases described in Phillips' catalogue are far from satisfactory. Of
course, this was not Phillips' fault, rather the fault of his contributors, who
frequently accepted what they were told by witnesses without the slightest
degree of critical thinking or logic. Some cases - eg the Alencon landing from
18th century France - have been dismissed by skeptical researchers as outright
frauds, whilst others - such as the car stop case at Tuscon (case 790) -
suggest that there may be valuable data lying around waiting to be discovered
and re-inter preted as unusual natural phenomena by liberal-minded scientists.
The real problem is this - how do we sort out the wheat from the chaff ???
We now move on to examine just a few cases from the mid
1960s. Readers may note an increase in the number of circular ground trace
cases listed as well as a corresponding improvement in detail. Whether this
makes the cases any more valuable is, of course, open to speculation.
Case 178, August 21st, 1964. U.S.A., Moses Lake, WA. 02.00
Hrs
Mrs W.D. Hawkes, awakened by a ringing noise, heard two
horses in a pasture making a commotion and the family dog barking. Next morning
concentric ring markings were found in the field. (FSR 11-70)
[PF:This case sounds promising. How many times have
we heard witnesses report a "ringing noise" or other unusual
acoustics when circular ground traces were forming? See CW #4 page 30-32
for one excellent case. The Rosedale case described on pages 216-218 of Crop
Circles, A Mystery Solved is another. How do the skeptics explain these
parallels?]
Case 179p. September 4th, 1964. U.S.A., Glassboro, NJ.
A glowing red ball was seen to descend in a wooded area. The
object was seen by two boys, who went to the landing area and found a clearing
in the woods. In the clearing they found the ground to be scorched, all grass
and vegetation was burnt in a circular pattern. In the centre of the clearing
was a hole 30 inches in diameter and 18 inches deep surrounded by a mound of
displaced earth and sand, all scorched black. Branches of surrounding trees 30
to 40 foot tall were broken and hung downward. There were three 6 inch holes in
the ground at equal distance from the centre hole. The circular area was about
30 feet in diameter. (Fate Magazine).
[PF: Another excellent case highly suggestive of some
natural earthlight or plasma-vortex interpretation. For the super skeptics
amongst you, please explain how the two boys managed to create such a large
circular trace. How did they create all the burning effects and damage tree
branches 30 to 40 feet above the ground? Presumably Fate Magazine has a
photograph of this trace. Does anyone have a copy ?]
Case 180, November 8th, 1964. CANADA, Saint-Alexis de
Montcalm, Quebec. 23.00 Hrs.
Mr. Lebel saw a lighted object at tree-top level, about
2,500 feet away [!!!]. At the site, a wide circle of crushed vegetation was
found, tree branches were broken, and a pole was calcined.
[PF: An interesting case. It is a pity that the
witness was so far away from the light as this increases the possibility that
the light had a mundane explanation. If so, the interesting traces might have
some un related explanation. On the other hand, if the witness saw what she
claims to have seen what kind of natural force can crush vegetation and calcify
a pole? Was there a steep hill slope nearby? Or is this more related to ball
lightning than a plasma vortex?]
Case 183. 1965. CANADA, Frankford, Ontario.
Three perfect circles [ie rings, PF] 23 inches in
diameter were found. The grass [was] growing about 18 inches high on either
side of the rings, each [ring was] about 16 inches wide. UFOs were reported on
the area at the time. (Saucers, Space and Science).
[PF: Sounds like a classic crop circle case doesn't
it. We'll chase this one up for a future issue.]
Case 184. 1965. U.S.A., Caner, MA.
A 15 foot burned circle was found in a field. (Hynek)
[PF:We have to be careful with burned circles as they
may be created by different forces to swirled circles. Strange isn't it how the
modern crop circle literature has only one case of a burned crop circle hoax,
from 1987, see CW#3, page 25 (case 5). Why is this?]
Case 185. 1965. U.S.A., Jaffrey, NH.
A ring was discovered and was assumed to have been left by a
flying saucer. The ring, apparently, had been made at or close to the time when
several Jaffrey residents reported [that] they had seen a saucer close to the
ground at the ring's location. (Monadnock Lodge, Canada).
[PF: Again we must be cautious. This could be a fairy
ring not a swirled ring. It could also be a hoax by the witnesses to support
their "sighting". What did the "saucer" look like ? Was it
really shaped like a "saucer" ? Or was it simply a very bright light
that the witness misperceived as a structured object due to the prevailing
cultural myth that any unidentified light must be a spaceship? This is another
case the skeptics must explain.]
Case 186, 1965. U.S.A., Chippewa Falls, WI.
Three witnesses, man, wife and son, observed green light
mass landing and ascending. 6 foot circle found dried at the site. Site
remained barren for eight months, water would run off of ground during that
time. Site seven miles south of city. (Brent Raynes).
[PF:Its a pity that there is no mention of a control
sample so that we can compare soil porosity in the circle with its
surroundings. This might just be a fungal growth of some kind.]
Case 187, 1965. NEW ZEALAND, Waihoke.
Ross Liverton reported a circle [ie a ring, PF] of
bare earth, 8 foot wide with a ring width of 12 inches. It was visible for four
years. (FSR)
[PF:Another unexplained ground marking, rather than a
crop circle. ]
Case 188s. January 12th, 1965. U.S.A., Custer, WA. 20.20
Hrs.
Four witnesses, Mrs Jubert and her three teenage daughters,
observed an extremely bright light coming towards their house. Thinking it was
about to hit the house, they ran outside. The light de scended below a tree
line and could not be seen. The object was tracked by Blaine Air Force Base
radar. The driver of a border patrol vehicle saw a slightly domed object, 30
foot in diameter, pass over his car. The object finally ascended vertically at
high speed and disappeared to the northeast. Where the object had landed in the
14 to 18 inches of snow, there was a large circular imprint, 12 foot in
diameter. In addition to the snow being melted, the ground showed evidence of
scorching. Tracks were found leading from the site, oval and about 8 inches
long and 8 inches apart in single file. The tracks led into a wooded area and
ended. (Vallee and UFO-INFO).
[PF: I have mixed feelings about this case. The
presence of "tracks" could indicate the involvement of hoaxers, yet
the account of the light sounds very intriguing. Did the UFO really appear on
radar ? I find that difficult to believe. This is a difficult case to evaluate
without a proper case summary to examine.]
Case 190. February 1965. CANADA, Alberta.
Farmer noted three rings which were much greener and about
30 to 40 feet in diameter. The outer circles [rings, PF] were not more
than 2 foot in width. They were not fairy rings or fungus growth. The grass was
dark green and 4 inches taller than the rest. (Saucers, Space and Science).
[PF: Actually this does sound like a fungal growth or
even a crop mark, rather than a crop circle.]
Case 191, 1965. AUSTRALIA, Tully.
Unusual hoof-like marks were found in the Tully area. The
marks were about 2 inches by 2 inches. (Claire Noble, Australia).
[PF:Is this date correct ? Could these traces be
vortex suction marks? Readers will recall that Claire Nobel is the local
researcher mentioned in Andy Collins' article in CW#14 pages 20-25]
Case 192, February 3rd, 1965. NEW ZEALAND, South Brighton.
20.45 Hours.
Man saw a light on the beach near Penguin Street, got out of
his car to observe it. He heard a whistling sound and saw an object, 25 foot
wide, rise from the beach to an altitude of about 600 feet. He returned to the
site with other persons and a dog that became restless at a spot where grass
was flattened. Another witness, driving near Humphrey Avenue, saw the object as
it rose over South Brighton. (Vallee III).
[PF: Sounds like a superb case doesn't it ! Does any
one know anything else about it?]
Case 818, February 14th, 1965. BRAZIL, Guarani.
Footprints and circles found. Five residents see un usually
large object land, three occupants 8 foot tall, thin, wearing tight-fitting
dark one-piece suits. (Beckley, Timothy Green. "Have Invaders From Space
Divided the Earth ?" in Saga UFO Special No 3, page 23).
[PF: Oh dear! So someone was fabricating UFO stories
involving circles as long ago as 1965! I will have to chase this story up. If
photographs exist of these "circles" we will have to assume that Doug
and Dave were not the first people to make circles to support the UFO
mythology. Of course these circles may not be crop circles, but that is a
secondary issue.]
Case 195p, March 15th, 1965. U.S.A., Fort Myers, FL. 01.00
Hrs.
Jim Flynn, 45, saw a lighted object while hunting. 88 feet
in diameter, windows 21 inch wide. A humming sound was heard. Flynn got to
within 8 feet of the object, a beam of light was projected towards him, he was
unconscious for 24 hours. He had lost vision in the right eye, saw poorly with
the left. In the hospital five days. Sawgrass was burned in a circle 72 feet in
diameter. The ground was turned up. Trees were burned. (NICAP and VALLEE
III).
[PF: This case bears distinct similarities to the
Falcon Lake incident, which took place two years later in Canada, as well as
the Travis Walton case. The Crop Watcher has recently received some
interesting material concerning the latter case - a "Fact File" from
Philip Klass and a newspaper story by a reporter who was a member of the team
sent by the Houston Post to investigate Walton's claim. If readers want
copies of this material please send me a large A4 sae with a 35p stamp]
Case 196, May 1965. CANADA, Willowdale.
A witness observed a light on the back portion of his lot in
the woods. The light finally moved to the tree-tops and disappeared in a
westerly direction. A few days later, while walking through the area he found a
circle [ie a ring, PF] 35 feet in diameter with an outer ring 3 foot
wide. (Saucers, Space and Science).
[PF: Now did the light create the ring or did the
witness create the ring to support his UFO sighting?]
Case 197, May 24th, 1965. AUSTRALIA, MacKay. 00.05 Hrs.
J.W. Tilse, a senior commercial pilot, and two other men saw
in front of Mr Tilse's hotel, a large (30 foot by 1 foot) dark-grey metallic
disc-shaped machine [!!!] hovering about 15 feet from the ground. There were
two lights near the ends of the object and "banks of floodlights" in
rows seemed suspended from it. Three legs could be seen below the flood-lights
with another light on each. The undersides of trees were illuminated by the
lights, as the object hovered about 300 feet away for about 45 minutes [!!!].
"On departure, rose slowly to approx. 300 feet, then accelerated more than
extremely rapidly in a NE to E direction. Would have been flying horizontally.
(?)"
"A circular impression was found on the ground two days
later by the local policeman. The centre of the circle was untouched, the
outside impression was 20 feet from inside to inside, and extended 3 foot 2
inches outwards. It was a perfect circle. Diameter did not vary. It was
practically under a telephone line. No evidence of damage can be seen. (To the
phone line or poles)". (CUFOS)
[PF: I find this case difficult to believe don't you?
Surely a case as impressive as this should be supported by hundreds of
witnesses and photographic evidence ?]
Case 672. May or June 1965. AUSTRALIA, Tully.
Large holes in triangular pattern found underwater in 30
foot swamp "nest" of floating reeds in counter-clockwise direction.
No object seen. (Harvey, Michael UFOs Over the Southern Hemisphere
Horwitz Pub. Inc. Pty. Ltd., North Sydney, Australia, 1969, page 111 via Fred
Merritt).
[PF: It seems strange that Phillips chose Harvey's
book as his primary source of information rather than the account that appeared
in Australian FSR (see CW #10). ]
All these cases highlight the issues that face UFOlogists as
we grapple with accounts of the unexplained. How much weight can we place on
such accounts? Are all these cases hoaxes - as the "dry" super
skeptics claim - or do some of these cases represent encounters with
objectively real but poorly understood natural phenomena? -- Paul Fuller,
1997
UFOs; Odd Shapes and Sizes
Just like people, UFOs come in all shapes and sizes. And
just like people, some UFOs film better that others. In the early days of the
UFO era, the majority of UFOs captured on film were of the disc-shaped crafts,
and were usually tagged as "flying saucers." The saucers are still
filmed today, but have had to make room for other shapes.
The most talked about UFOs today are the triangle, crescent,
or V-shaped objects, but oddly enough, there are almost no still photographs of
these objects that are usually big, black, and silent running.
With so many sky watchers using video cameras, there have
been a great number of objects filmed with three points of light, or many
lights which seem to form more or less a V or triangular shape. It is still
extremely rare though to see a discernable structure behind these lights.This
does not, however, discredit the authenticity of the photograph.
For reasons still unexplained, visible, structured
triangle-shaped UFOs seem to be very camera shy. During the famous Belgian wave
of 1989-1990, many photographs were snapped of the intruding triangles only to
show nothing when the film was developed. Explanations were offered for this
failure such as electromagnetic anomalies, meteorological disturbance, and
radioactive interference, yet no clear cut reason has been established.
Finally, one amazing photograph was taken at Petit Rechain, which became a UFO
classic. Since that time, only a handful of triangle photos have been made
public, and those are open to discussion as to their authenticity.
Today, especially on moving film, we have entered the age of
the orbs, which are ofttimes points of light in the night sky, showing glowing
light, yet few are taken which show structure or a definitive shape. What
percentage of these objects are actually UFOs is anybody's guess. Ufology today
seems to be in a rut of listing sighting report after report, albeit without
follow up investigation, and we are left with photographs, video film, theory
and nothing more. Still photographs and video film of these strange unknown
flying objects that seem to come and go as they please will continue, no doubt,
as the cameramen, both amateur and professional hope to capture that one
conclusive piece of evidence that will finally prove that we really are not
alone.
In addition to the aforementioned, we have seen many other
shapes and sizes of UFOs, and in this presentation, I am going to show some of
the odd and strange shapes of UFOs that have been put forward as proof of the
existence of extraterrestrial life. This is only a small part of a much larger
catalogue.
Note: It is not the contention of the UFO Casebook that all
of the images shown on this page are of extraterrestial controlled flying
craft.
1870-Mt. Washington, N. H. "Elongated Cigar
UFO" 1952-Salem Massachusetts "Fleet UFO Orbs" 1957-Edwards AFB, California "Structured
Disc"
1967-Ohio "Cigar or Elongated UFO" 1974-Belotia, Yugoslavia "Hat or Sombrero
UFO" 1976-Canary Island "Alien Sphere/Orb"
1987-Connecticut "Ring of Lights" 1987-Gulf Breeze, Florida "Ed Walters UFO" 1990-Petit Rechain, Belgium "Triangle UFO"
There is a
reason why we show and research older information is clear. As you see in these
pictures they were taken at a time when computer manipulation wasn't a factor
hoaxes of fakes were harder to come by we believe these to be of genuine value
Best UFO
Information and Research Resources
This page is a collection
of selected UFO resources: real UFO picture and video
galleries, video documentaries, technical data, scientific studies, books,
portals, newsfeeds, blogs and forums. In short, by combining info from many
diverse sources, our goal is to offer a "starting point" for in-depth
info and gems of real value in a labyrinth of (often false) information
published on the fascinating subject of UFOs.
comprehensive analysis
of the UFO phenomenon, as well as
original research and experiences
EARTH-SEARCH.NET Working Group, has enabled
us to make some specific conclusions about UFOs, Extraterrestrial
Intelligence and their motives. The summation of this analysis, which follows,
is intended to assist both groups and individuals in their efforts to
understand this complex subject. We have recorded only those conclusions for
which we have a high level of certainty The summary from the comprehensive
assessment of the UFO phenomenon by CSETI.
"Some UFOs are extraterrestrial
spacecraft (ETS) which are piloted by extraterrestrial biological entities
(EBEs) who originate on another planet, and most likely another star system
About the only point that can be made concerning UFOs without the risk of
starting an unpleasant controversy is that they are supremely controversial.
Any discussion of their nature, their origins, their significance and, indeed,
their very existence, has led to long-term arguments that have yet to reach any
generally agreed-upon conclusion. To state there is no evidence suggestive of
intelligent extraterrestrial life simply belies the facts. Decades in duration
and global in nature, there are too many hard sensor data-points and millions
of eyewitnesses to ignore. It is only through ignorance or pomposity that one
can say no evidence exists.
If the only strange things
seen in the sky were a few oddly moving lights, or some specks glinting in the
sun, there would be no UFO problem. But there have
been many close observations of these strange objects. In addition, physical
traces of various kinds have been left behind, and witnesses have experienced
physical and medical effects, including injury and death. Of all of the
reported sightings, between 5 and 25% (depending on the sample) remain
unidentifiable to expert examination. These are the real UFOs. Careful review of the
vast array of relevant evidence clearly leads to the conclusion that some
unidentified flying objects are intelligently controlled vehicles whose origin
is outside our solar system. All the arguments against the extraterrestrial
origin seem to be based upon false reasoning, misrepresentation of evidence,
neglect of relevant information, ignorance of relevant technology, or pseudo
sophisticated assumptions about alien appearance, motivation, or government
secrecy.
I
know the Secret of the Flying Saucers
by
Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe, USMC (Ret.)
Editor's
Note: Major Keyhoe has been writing about Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO's)
in this magazine and elsewhere for over 15 years. From the outset he has
insisted that flying saucers are real and interplanetary, and many authorities
have come to agree with him. Now he claims that control over gravity itself is
the only explanation for the astounding maneuvers which saucers are said to
make.
Some
physicists dismiss this theory as fundamentally erroneous. But, as you will
read, there are others who find Major Keyhoe's latest chapter in "The
Great Flying Saucer Story" important and plausible.
One
night last February, over the North Pacific, a Flying Tiger Airlines crew had a
startling aerial encounter. What they saw is a clue to a fantastic technical
mystery. In its solution lies a prize so great that six government agencies are
searching for it right now. The answer may not be far off. What they are
searching for is the secret of gravity control.
About
midnight on February 15, the Flying Tiger plane, carrying a military group from
the U.S. to Japan, was four hours out of Anchorage. Suddenly the cockpit radar
picked up three fast-moving objects. The plane captain and his crew looked out
at the side and saw three huge oval-shaped ships, glowing red in the night.
An
Air Force captain who was a passenger on the plane was called forward to
confirm the sighting. His signed report is in the files of the National
Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena.
According
to the captain's report, the unknown machines slowed down to the airliner's
speed and flew in close formation. Five miles away, by radar range, they
leveled off to pace the plane. The Air Force captain computed their length as
much more than 700 feet. It was plain that the giant Unidentified Flying
Objects had an unknown type of propulsion. No jets, no exhausts were visible.
For 30 minutes, still in formation, they continued to pace the plane.
Then,
swiftly accelerating to 1,200 knots, they climbed out of sight in seconds.
This
startlingly swift acceleration is a maneuver that could not be duplicated by
any ship now made on Earth. What makes it possible for UFO's? According to many
scientists and engineers, there is only one possible answer. The answer is
antigravity: artificial gravity fields and control of gravity power.
Control
of gravity is something that men have been dreaming about for centuries. Now it
appears that we are on the threshhold of achieving it. Its value, to the
country that first attains it, is incalculable. Our government, hoping for a
technical breakthrough, has set up 46 different research projects on various
aspects of gravity control. The Air Force is running 33 of these projects and
the others are divided among five other agencies.
Included
in the 46 government projects are experiments and research at two Air Force
Laboratories (Flight Dynamics and General Physics Research), Radio Corporation
of America, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Israel Institute of
Technology, Haifa; Stevens Institute of Technology; the universities of
California, Denver, Harvard, Indiana, Manchester (England), Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Ohio, Purdue, Stockholm (Sweden), Syracuse, Texas, and two New York
schools - Queens College and Yeshiva Graduate School of Science.
And,
of course, some government agencies have projects so secret that they are not
publicly registered and cannot be revealed without permission.
Private
industry is also looking at the question of gravity control with new
seriousness. A large number of giant corporations, including Bell Aerospace,
General Electric, Hughes Aircraft, Boeing, Douglas and many others, have set up
gravity projects. If you add up all the known gravity programs being run by the
government and private industry, you get somewhere between 65 and 70 projects.
This means there is a heavy concentration of scientific and engineering brains
working on the problem.
One
leading scientist who is convinced that UFO's are spaceships using gravity
control is Dr. Hermann Oberth. Doctor Oberth, a recognized authority, was
co-designer of the V-2 rocket and later a U.S. special consultant at
Huntsville, Alabama, one of the installations where important antigravity
research is now under way. "With ordinary propulsion," Doctor Oberth
told me in 1961, "such violent accelerations and maneuvers would endanger
the ship. Also, the force would crush any creatures aboard against the rear or
sides of the machine. But with an artificial gravity field the force applies
simultaneously to the passengers and the spaceship. Even in swift changes of
speed and direction, the ship is not strained and the passengers feel
nothing."
Today,
doctor Oberth is willing to go further. He is now of the opinion "that
energy, inertia and gravitational fields are only aspects of one and the same
thing" and that it will prove impossible to separate them from each other.
What he has in mind, he says, is "not yet known fields of force"
which can be used to accelerate material objects in a way similar to the force
of gravity. Another noted authority who agrees that UFO's are using artificial
G fields is William P. Lear, Sr., [see "Hard-nosed Gambler in the Plane
Game" in this issue] multimillionaire inventor, pilot, designer of air and
space equipment and builder of jet aircraft. Lear, who once sighted a UFO from
his executive plane, predicts that future U.S. vehicles will also use
artificial gravity.
"The
people on board would probably not feel any more effect," Lear says,
"than they do from the tremendous speed of the Earth as it rotates and
orbits and orbits the sun."
Several
years ago, Glenn Martin's vice-president for advanced design, G. S. Trimble,
predicted that by 1985 practically all airliners would be using artificial
gravity, flying at almost unbelievable speeds. At about the same time, future
airliner speeds of 10,000 mph. or more were pictured by Dr. Walter Dornberger,
then Bell Aircraft's chief guided-missile scientist and now president of Bell
Aerospace. Grover Loening, pioneer aircraft builder and consultant to the Air
Force, said it even more strongly, "I firmly believe that before long man
will acquire the ability to build an electromagnetic contragravity mechanism
that works," he stated.
A
top official of Bethlehem Steel, Jesse V. Honeycutt, has indicated some of the
results we can expect if Loening is right. ""serious research is
being concentrated in an attempt to solve the mystery of gravity and bring
about a control of its power. It would bring about a greater revolution in
power, transportation and many other fields than the discovery of atomic
power,""he stated. Antigravity? It seems inconceivable. Yet, the
search goes on and many responsible men believe the answer will be found. And,
to my mind, it is the only possible explanation for the performance of the
UFO's.
The
stakes are so high that no clue can be overlooked. The Air Force Technical
Intelligence, hunting for overlooked leads, is carefully checking hundreds of
verified UFO reports. Hopefully, some of them will help us find out how these
strange vehicles operate. Four days before Christmas, 1964, a round, metallic
craft about 125 feet in diameter was observed to make a brief landing in a
field near Staunton, Virginia. Two Du Pont scientists later took Geiger
counters to the site. "It was 'hot'-highly radioactive," Du Pont
engineer Lawrence Cook reported. "We checked for 45 minutes - it was
definitely 'hot'." In Puerto Rico, near dusk on December 26, 1964, Ramey
Air Force Base radar spotted two large discs. As A4D jets streaked up to pursue
them, the discs accelerated to terrific speed. Making instant right-angle
turns-impossible for any known aircraft-they vanished over the Atlantic.
On
March 21, 1965, Capt. Yoshiaki Inada, piloting a Toa Airlines Convair on a
domestic Japanese flight, was chased by a "mysterious, elliptical luminous
object." Flying close to the plane, the UFO blanked out his radio and
"violently interfered" with his automatic direction finding equipment.
Puzzling earlier cases also are being rechecked. On July 1, 1954, an AF F-94 -
a two-man jet - was scrambled to chase a UFO near Walesville, New York. When
the pilot tried to close in, a sudden, unbearable heat filled the cockpit.
Half-dazed, the pilot and radar officer bailed out. The jet crashed in the
street, killing two children and their parents. These odd phenomena, high
radiation, mysterious heat and electrical interference may be side effects of
gravity control devices. Like most people, you probably took gravity for
granted before space flights began. Now you know, for example, that one
"G" is the Earth's normal gravitational pull. This is what holds you
to the seat of your chair - and more important, keeps you from being tossed
into the air by the Earth'' rotation. You feel two or three G'' in a roller
coaster or a stunting plane --a mere hint of what our astronauts have to endure
during blast-off and acceleration.
But
gravity causes a lot of trouble and expense we seldom think about. Aircraft and
rocket builders have to provide heavy engines, huge weight of fuel, just to
offset gravity. In construction of buildings, bridges, and in a hundred other
ways, G affects our lives and adds billions to the cost of work.
Gravity
control could reduce or end many of these problems.
How
soon can we expect antigravity? Some researchers say it may take a long time.
Others believe there may be a sudden breakthrough. If that happens, there will
be some fantastic results. First, obviously, our space program would take a big
leap forward. Instead of our present wasteful rockets, we could build
spaceships matching the UFO's high speeds and maneuvers. With such advanced
ships, we could make swift flights to the moon and the planets. Recently,
Alexander de Seversky stated that "with abundant energy available, we will
move in space with constant acceleration or deceleration. Accelerating half-way
to our goal and decelerating the rest of the way at one G or 32.2 feet per
second, the moon will be reached in three and a half hours, Venus in 36 hours,
Mars in two days, Jupiter in six."
According
to Oberth, German physicist Burkhard Heim and other scientists, gravity control
will enable spaceships to reach even greater speeds than these. With such
advanced machines, we could explore the nearest star systems a century or more
ahead of our present timetable. Using carrier or "parent" ships with
short-range probes, we could fully explore a planet - either by remote control
or direct observation - before attempting to land. Many cases are on record in
which large UFO's have launched small units, apparently for close observation
of the Earth, then retrieved them in swift, precise operations. In one such
case (an official AF Intelligence report), groups of small UFO's flying at 5240
mph. were seen and tracked by the crew of an AF B-29. One group, after abruptly
slowing to pace the bomber, resumed its speed within seconds. The small UFO's
were then seen to merge with or go aboard a huge carrier which accelerated to
more than 9,000 mph. before it disappeared. Because of G-crafts' tremendous
speeds, the picture of possible military operations becomes hair-raising. Let's
take as a basis the figure in a documented case at White Sands Proving Ground,
where Navy scientists saw and tracked a UFO flying at 18,000 mph.
Such
terrific speed could put bombers back into the picture in place of missiles.
Attacks by G-bombers from bases near major targets would take less than five
minutes. If a "rush-fire" war broke out halfway around the world, a huge
G-transport carrying a fully armed division - or even an army - could be on the
scene in 40 minutes, or less. Another effect of gravity control will be a big
change in air travel. Here's what a G-liner trip would be like, according to
several researchers. Let's say you are making a flight from New York to London.
You go aboard a large ship - probably disc-shaped, from present indications.
Your seat has no safety belts - none are needed. The ship takes off vertically,
accelerating at incredible speed. You feel weightless but you feel no motion.
The airliner arcs up into a great circle course, silently, with no
"bumps" - no rough air. In 10 to 15 minutes, London suddenly takes
shape below. There is no long approach, skimming over rooftops. You descend
vertically and land. If traffic is heavy, your pilot would stop the ship in
midair and hover until cleared.
In
spite of the speed, you'd be safer - especially in regard to many of the
strange eddies which have thrown jet airliners into uncontrollable dives. In
probing the riddle of gravity, project scientists try widely different
approaches - some even contrary to accepted natural laws. Under an Army
contract, a University of Detroit team has built a 4,000-pound, specially wired
rotor which spins at 100,000 rpm. With this unique device, scientists are
testing gravitational radiation theories searching for a possible key to G
control.
Using
gravity meters based on new principles of physics, Air Force teams make
frequent flights around the equator and over the poles, to speed up worldwide
measurement of the Earth's gravitational pull. Tied in with this is a network
of gravity stations and special projects all over the world. Though no
breakthrough has occurred (unless in highly secret projects) two significant facts
have been established. The Earth's G field is relatively weak, compared with
the pull of gravity between planets and the sun. There is a connection between
gravity and electromagnetic fields. Igo Sikorsky, discussing the colossal force
of spatial G, says a steel cable about 8,000 miles thick would be needed to
hold the Earth in its orbit --if it were not for gravity. But, fortunately for
our anti-G search, the Earth's gravity pull, for objects on the ground or at
average flight altitudes, is fairly small. Likewise, the force required to
cancel its pull would be relatively small - if a method can be found.
Using
various barriers we can shield ourselves from the heat, light and sound waves.
But, so far, no way has been found to create a gravity shield. Some scientists
still call the gravity shield idea a "lunatic fringe" notion. But
many now refuse to say that such a thing is completely impossible. Are UFO's
using a gravity shield? In an effort to find out, the Air Force is renewing its
attempts to capture a UFO. If we could get one on the ground, undamaged, it
might make possible a big shortcut in our gravity research and save us years of
slow, tedious scientific work. In the past, many Air Force pilots have tried to
down UFO's, without success. But the Air Force has new reason for hope now,
based on the recent increase in low-altitude UFO approaches and "touch
landings."
On
the night of January 12, 1965, an officer of a federal law enforcement agency
had a close encounter. As he was driving his official car toward Blaine Air
Force Station, in Washington, a flying disc 30 feet in diameter hurtled down at
his automobile. At the last moment the disc arced up steeply, avoiding
collision. When the officer jumped out, he saw the UFO hovering overhead.
After
a minute, it shot up into clouds at high speed. A short time afterward, the UFO
- or a similar one - was seen landing in a field near Blaine, melting the snow
and scorching the ground before it took off. When the AF questioned the federal
officer, they said they had tracked the UFO by radar as it raced down toward
his car.
This
officer, like many other UFO witnesses, was warned by his superiors not to let
his name be used in connection with the sighting. On January 25, 1965, two NASA
engineers sighted a UFO which touch landed near Hampton, Virginia. One witness
was Maj. John Nayadley, a retired AF jet pilot. The other was A. G. Crimmins,
who saw the strange machine maneuvering toward the ground. "It was
zigzagging as if searching for a landing spot," said Crimmins. "I
watched it through 20 x 50 binoculars and I could see flashing lights. They
appeared to be on the rim of a rapidly rotating disc." Before anyone could
reach the spot, the flying disc took off and rapidly climbed out of sight.
The
step-up in UFO chases was demonstrated at Washington, D.C., on January 11,
1965, when AF jets pursued several flying objects over the city. The chase was
confirmed by an Army lieutenant-colonel and a group of Army communications
specialists. If jets had been near any of the "touch" sites, they
might have swarmed down and kept the UFO from getting away. But records of
previous attempts to capture UFOs indicate it will be a tough job. Whether we
capture a UFO or not, the search for the elusive secret will go on. The
connection between gravity and electromagnetic fields may provide the key to
the mystery.
For
several years, Burkhard Heim, director of the German Research Institute of
Field Physics at Goettingen, Germany, has been searching for the answer to the
gravity riddle. Finally, Heim revealed that by direct experimentation he had
discovered a positive lead to antigravity. The discovery involved an
intermediate field, neither electromagnetic nor gravitational. The results,
Heim stated, if applied to space flight, would be direct levitation, conversion
of electricity into kinetic energy without any waste, and "immunizing the
occupants and the structures of such vehicles against any effects from
acceleration of the vehicle, however great and violent." After the first
shock, several scientists examined Heim's claims.
"His
approach is not in conflict with known laws of nature, and it agrees with the
quantum theory," A.R. Weyl said in an analysis for the British magazine,
Aeronautics. "If Heim were right, the amazing properties commonly ascribed
to the mysterious flying saucers' would be, in fact, sound physics and proper
engineering." Heim's work toward the goal of an actual antigravity device
using "field inducers" has evidently been put under official German
security. He has refused to divulge the key to his formula. Heim's findings
would indicate that antigravity researchers may discover new scientific laws
and that their work may invalidate old theories. Some scientists are already
saying privately that Einstein's famous "general theory of
relativity" may turn out to be totally fallacious. Newton's law has also
come in for attacks. However, Robert Forward, G expert of Hughes Aircraft
Company, uses the Einstein theory to show that it is possible to partially
nullify the Earth's gravitational field.
The
amount of nullification obtainable with present-day technology is extremely
small, however. Forward predicts that some day, when our technology is greatly
advanced, we will be able to "create artificial gravity fields at
will."
With
a real all-out effort this could happen a lot sooner than the 10 or 20 years
many scientists have in mind. But getting enough top men to work in the field
is a problem. One scientist says, "Scientists are sensitive about their
reputations and many of them still think antigravity is a joke. If they knew
the facts, they'd be eager to get into it." Fear among scientists is
partially due to the Air force censorship of UFO reports. Air force censors not
only hide the facts but also belittle those who publicly report UFO sightings.
One recent victim was Dempsey Bruton, chief of satellite tracking at NASA's
Wallops Island station in Virginia. On January 5, 1965, Bruton saw a strange
round object flying at terrific speed toward the station. After it passed
overhead, the UFO shot straight up out of sight.
Using
the elapsed time - six to nine seconds - and angles and times reported by other
witnesses, Bruton said the speed was definitely "several thousand miles
per hour, possibly 8,000 mph. or even higher." The AF, implying he was
incompetent, rejected the report and said it was not evidence of any
technically superior machine.
But
AF policy notwithstanding, the drive to get the secret of antigravity is well
underway. It can't be stopped now. But it can be speeded up. We are already
spending billions on the space program - on the race to the moon, to Mars.
Harnessing gravity could put us years ahead and save us enormous sums of money.
With control of the universe at stake, a crash program is imperative. We
produced the A-bomb, under the huge Manhattan Project, in an amazingly short
time. The needs, the urgency today are even greater. The Air Force should end
UFO secrecy, give the facts to scientists, the public, to Congress. Once the
people realize the truth, they would back - even demand - a crash G program.
For
this is one race we dare not lose. - Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe
The
GEPAN - SEPRA Report
Appendix
1: Official UFO Investigations in France: the GEPAN/SEPRA Project
For more than 20 years, the
French space agency has conducted a non-military but official investigation
into UFO reports. In its first phase, the project was named GEPAN and its focus
was primarily on UFO reports. Subsequently, the project was renamed SEPRA and
was assigned a more general responsibility for studying all atmospheric reentry
phenomena. In the body of the report, we have for convenience referred to the
project as "GEPAN/SEPRA." This appendix gives a brief summary of the
history, mission, operations and achievements of this project.
The
French space agency is known as CNES (Centre National d'Études Spatiales). It
was founded in 1962 to conduct French space activities on a national basis and
also in the context of the European Space Agency (ESA) or of other international
collaborations. CNES currently has 2,500 employees. The CNES headquarters are
in Paris but its technical center is in Toulouse.
GEPAN
(Groupe d'Études des Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés - Study Group for
Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena) was established as a department of CNES in
Toulouse in 1977. At that time, its head was Dr. Claude Poher, who had already
performed statistical analyses of files containing several thousand
observations worldwide (Poher, 1973). CNES set up a scientific advisory board
comprising astronomers, physicists, legal experts and other eminent citizens to
monitor and guide GEPAN's activities.
The
first tasks undertaken by GEPAN were:<ul
To
establish data collection procedures in conjunction with the Air Force, civil aviation
authorities, the Gendarmerie (French internal police), meteorological offices,
the national police, etc. </ul
•To conduct statistical analyses of
eye-witness reports.
•To investigate previously reported
cases.
These
initial studies led to the following conclusions:
oThose events that remain
unexplained after careful analysis are neither numerous nor frequent.
oThe appearance of some reported
phenomena cannot readily be interpreted in terms of conventional physical,
psychological or psycho-social models.
oThe existence of a physical
component of these phenomena seems highly likely.
Following
these initial steps, GEPAN undertook to develop a more theoretical but rigorous
approach to these studies. It was clear at the outset that it would be necessary
to consider both the physical nature and the psychological nature of the
phenomenon. In order to fully understand a witness's narrative account, it was
necessary to consider not only the account but the psychology and personality
of the witness, the physical environment in which the event occurred, and the
witness's psycho-social environment.
GEPAN
negotiated agreements with the Gendarmerie Nationale, the Air Force, the Navy,
the meteorological offices, police, etc. These negotiations led to procedures
by which these organizations provided GEPAN with relevant reports, video tapes,
films, etc., which were then processed and analyzed either by GEPAN or by
associated laboratories. However, from 1979 on, GEPAN worked mainly with
reports from the Gendarmerie since these reports proved to be best suited for
GEPAN's purposes.
GEPAN
developed a classification system to reflect the level of difficulty in
understanding the reports:
Type
A: The phenomenon is fully and unambiguously identified.
Type
B: The nature of the phenomenon has probably been identified but some doubt
remains.
Type
C: The report cannot be analyzed since it lacks precision, so no opinion can be
formed.
Type
D: The witness testimony is consistent and accurate but cannot be interpreted
in terms of conventional phenomena.
Reports
of Type A and Type B were further subdivided into astronomical, aeronautical,
space, miscellaneous, and identified. GEPAN carried out statistical analyses
aimed at classifying cases according to sets of physical characteristics.
Two
types of investigations were carried out on individual reports:
oMini-investigations, that were
applied to cases of limited significance; and
oFull investigations, that were
applied to unexplained cases (Type D) in which effort was made to obtain as
much information as possible, including gathering and analyzing physical and
biological evidence.
During
the GEPAN phase, the project initiated several lines of research involving
other laboratories and consultants. These were aimed at seeking a possible
basis for modeling unexplained aspects of UFO reports, as well as seeking new
techniques for the more active investigation of UFO events by the development
of detection systems. These research topics included:
oResearch on possible
magnetohydrodynamic propulsion systems;
oStudy of facilities to collect
unexpected atmospheric phenomena on a worldwide basis, that led to the proposal
of the Eurociel Project to develop a network of ground stations equipped with
wide-angle observation systems and powerful real-time processing algorithms;
oMethodology for image analysis
(photographs, videos, etc.); and
oStudy of aeronautical cases,
especially radar-visual cases.
In
1988, GEPAN was replaced by SEPRA (Service d'Expertise des Phénomènes de
Rentrées Atmosphériques - Atmospheric Re-entry Phenomena Expertise Department).
M. J-J. Velasco, who had been a member of GEPAN since the very beginning, took
charge of this new project that was then assigned a wider mission. This new
project was called upon to investigate all re-entry phenomena including debris
from satellites, launches, etc. However, the budget was drastically reduced so
that research into UFO reports could not be maintained at the earlier level.
Nevertheless, all existing official procedures concerning data collection have
been maintained to ensure continuity in receiving reports.
After
21 years of activity, the GEPAN/SEPRA files now contain about 3,000 UFO reports
supplied by the Gendarmerie. About 100 of these reports were found to justify
specific investigations. Of this number, only a few cases remain unexplained
today.
There
have been attempts by SEPRA to increase the scope of the project at least to a
European level, but this has not yet been successful. One of these attempts was
the "Eurociel" project: the basic concept was to implement two sets
of wide-angle optical detection stations, sited some tens of miles apart
following a parallel of latitude, each station to be equipped with CCD-type
cameras, with a minimum of one in the visible and one in the infrared. The
output from these cameras would feed data into a microcomputer that triggers
recording of the data when the computer determines that a change has suddenly
occurred. The data from all these stations would be stored in a central
facility to permit the calculation of trajectories. Such a system could detect
lightning, meteors, unknown satellites, and other known or unknown phenomena.
During
the GEPAN phase, the project produced many reports and investigations and
technical documents concerning topics related to the study of UFO events. These
reports were made publicly available. These reports are no longer being
disseminated, but some information can still be requested from CNES.
Appendix
2: Procedures for Analysis of Photographic Evidence
F.
LOUANGE
The
Panel recommends that, given a new alleged UFO photograph, the decision to
invest effort into its investigation should be taken only if both of the
following conditions are fulfilled:
10.the original documentation
(negative, slide, videotape) is available, and
11.there is at least one other
independent source of information - either witness testimony or some other
physical record.
If,
after visual examination, the displayed object has not been identified (planet,
balloon, cloud, etc.), investigation should be performed in two steps:
Step
1 consists of establishing or rejecting the authenticity of the photograph (or
other record), taking into account evidence for unintentional false operation
of equipment and various spurious phenomena that may affect the recording
equipment. However, this concept of authenticity is at best relative, since in
this area of investigation only negative conclusions may be considered as
final, so that authenticity can never be demonstrated absolutely.
Step
2, if warranted, consists of extracting as much information as possible from
the photograph or other record, so as to obtain as much information as possible
about the object of interest (size, shape, distance, albedo, emitted energy,
spectrum, etc.).
When
the original film is available and analysis seems justified, all technical data
concerning the site, viewing conditions, camera, film, processing, etc., must
be collected. If the camera is available (in an ideal case still loaded with
the original film), it must be used to perform the following calibrations:
12.Photos of density patterns for
relative photometry;
13.Photos of sources calibrated in
intensity, in various positions in the frame (for absolute photometry);
14.Photos of spatial frequency
patterns, to determine the modulation transfer function (MTF); and
15.Photos taken at the same site as the
original, eventually with models to simulate the object.
The
film should be processed under rigorously controlled conditions (if it has not
already been processed commercially). If the camera is available but empty, the
same operations should be conducted with a film of the same type as the
original.
The
investigator should visit the original site and make measurements concerning
the three-dimensional geometry of the observed landscape or this information
should be extracted from detailed maps. If the photograph has been acquired at
nighttime, an astronomical map of the sky at the time of acquisition will be
necessary. The investigator should determine the meteorological conditions from
the official offices or air bases in the neighborhood with particular attention
to the horizontal visibility. The investigator should also take into account
all quantified or quantifiable elements of the witness testimony including the
estimated shape, angular size, velocity, color, etc.
For
analysis of the photograph, it is essential to work from the original negative.
This should be carefully washed and examined under a microscope to look for
possible tell-tale artifacts and scratches, and to check the regularity of the
grain structure so as to detect multiple exposures. The negative should be
analyzed by conventional photographic instruments (enlarger, projector, etc.),
and the information on the negative should be digitized by a microdensitometer.
Once
digitized, the image may be analyzed by computer analysis, using the classical
tools of contrast enhancement, noise suppression, contour detection,
restoration, etc., and more specialized techniques such as maximum-entropy
analysis that may be used to remove the effects of target motion and/or camera
motion. Such analysis will assist in the detection of a possible hoax. For
instance, a suspension thread may be brought into evidence through standard
differential operations. Also, one may estimate the distance (hence the size)
of the object through MTF computations, based on an analysis of atmospheric
diffusion and contour blurring. If there are black areas on the object, it is
possible to obtain estimates of the distance by comparing the luminance of such
regions with other identified black parts of the scenery. If the object is
nearer than the minimum depth of field, one should be able to detect
geometrical distortions in the image. If the operator had a slight movement
while taking the picture, analysis of the corresponding blur on the object and
on other elements of the landscape may allow the calculation of a possible
range for the distance of the object.
In
the case of a color photograph, one should carry out the above procedures in
three steps using three appropriate color filters for scanning.
If
an event is recorded on a cine camera, each frame may be analyzed as above.
However, it is now possible to obtain additional information by combining and
comparing the sequence of images.
In
principle, images recorded by video cameras may be subjected to comparable
analyses. However, video records suffer from one very important weakness: since
the basic data is in electronic form, it could have been modified by the use of
suitable electronic equipment, so that the authenticity of a video record will
depend even more critically upon the credibility of the witness testimony.
Appendix
3: Formation Flying
V.
R. ESHLEMAN
A
recurrent theme in certain UFO reports is the concept of an apparition that
flies in formation with an aircraft-borne observer. Without making a judgment
on any such reports, we could recommend that UFO investigators familiarize
themselves with natural phenomena that display this
"flying-in-formation" characteristic. Greenler (1980) is a useful
resource, from which the attached list was made. The precise mechanisms for the
origin of most of these phenomena have been determined and are explained in
Greenler, but quite a few have still not been deciphered satisfactorily. Even
an experienced observer might be surprised in seeing a particularly rare
example. I have studied certain related phenomena in my research involving
electromagnetic probing of planetary atmospheres, but was quite astonished a
few years ago when I saw a particular example of the following list. A bright
white light flew for minutes in perfect formation between my aircraft and the
ground, with the air below and above apparently being transparently clear.
Formation
flying phenomena:
Arcs:
Kern, Lowitz, Wegener anthelic, Hastings anthelic, Tricken anthelic, Parry, alternate
Parry, suncave Parry, sunvex Parry, upper tangent, lower tangent, supralateral,
infralateral, circumzenithal, circumhorizontal, anthelic, subanthelic, contact.
Halos:
Hevel, 8 degree, 18 degree, 22 degree, 46 degree, circumscribed.
Bows:
fog, cloud, dew, supernumerary.
Rainbows:
primary and secondary; direct and reflected; raindrop and ice crystal; white,
red, and red-to-blue.
Pillars:
sun, moon, city-light, anthelic.
Rings
or Circles: Bishop, Bottlinger, parhelic, subparhelic, coronal.
Dogs:
sun, moon, elongated, subsun.
One
should also consider: Nighttime: moon, Venus, Jupiter, bright stars, etc.,
gegenschein, zodiacal light, comet, in-cabin light reflected by window.
Other
forms: glory (specter of the Brocken), subsun, wet and dry heiligenschein,
seven suns, lenticular and other distant small clouds, several different kinds
of mirages.
The
phenomenon which was a special surprise to me is one in the final grouping, the
subsun, due to particularly stably falling, flat, horizontal, hexagonal, ice
crystals which were sufficiently few in number that the air appeared clear in
every direction except the solar specular direction to the side of and below
the airplane, where they efficiently mirrored the sun.
Appendix
4: Electromagnetic-Wave Ducting
V.
R. ESHLEMAN
It
is possible that some of the radar cases presented to the panel have a natural
explanation. It seems likely that some possible natural explanations could be
investigated without cooperation or assistance from the controlling military
authorities except for a time record of unidentified traces that occur during
designated test periods.
Some
of the observations suggest that time-variable atmospheric ducting may on
occasion result in echoes being obtained from distant ground locations as a
result of refraction. Some of accounts described (a) groups or swarms of echoes
that persist for some time in the same general location; (b) apparent
trajectories of echo sources that exhibit sudden changes in the vertical and/or
horizontal positions; and in particular (c) the tendency of apparent echo
sources to concentrate over mountain tops. These are all characteristics to be
expected of ducting conditions due to weather. These effects can come and go
over long periods of time and they can also lead to scintillation or other
changes over short time periods. (See, for instance, Hall & Barklay 1989.)
An
atmosphere is said to be "superrefractive" when a horizontal light or
radio ray curves downward with a radius of curvature that is less than the
distance to the center of the planet. The atmosphere of the planet Venus is at
all times globally superrefractive below an altitude of about 30 kilometers. In
principle, echoes could be obtained from every area of the spherical surface of
Venus from a radar system located at any position on the surface. If the air of
Venus were perfectly clear, an observer would see all areas of the surface, all
areas repeating in range to indefinite distances. In the four giant planets
also, the large gradients of refractivity (or density) in their atmospheres
produce superrefractive conditions.
The
Earth's atmosphere is normally not superrefractive. However, common weather
effects (in particular thermal inversions, where the air temperature increases
with altitude, and/or the water-vapor content decreases with altitude) can and
do produce regions of superrefraction that are localized geographically and in
height. As a result, atmospheric ducts (channels that trap and conduct radar
waves) can form that carry the signals far beyond the normal horizon. Such
ducts can bend rays down to a distant surface area or, more easily, to a
distant mountain top. Backscattering of the radar energy from the ground or
from discrete objects on the ground then results in echoes that appear to the radar
to be due to a target that is far away and (if the angle of elevation of the
returning energy is measured) high in the atmosphere. A similar transient
ducting of sound can produce the experience of hearing the whistle of only one
particular train out of the many that originate at difference times from a busy
track in the next valley.
As
is well known, atmospheric ducting is the explanation for certain optical
mirages, and in particular the arctic illusion called "fata morgana"
where distant ocean or surface ice, which is essentially flat, appears to the
viewer in the form of vertical columns and spires, or "castles in the
air."
People
often assume that mirages occur only rarely. This may be true of optical
mirages, but conditions for radar mirages are more common, due to the role
played by water vapor which strongly affects the atmospheric refractivity in
relation to radio waves. Since clouds are closely associated with high levels
of water vapor, optical mirages due to water vapor are often rendered undetectable
by the accompanying opaque cloud. On the other hand, radar propagation is
essentially unaffected by the water droplets of the cloud so that changes in
water vapor content with altitude are very effective in producing atmospheric
ducting and radar mirages.
With
regard to "impossible" flight paths that may appear to be indicated
by some of the echoes obtained by military radars, it is important to note that
the records presented to the panel are based on measured time delays and
measured elevation and azimuth angles-of-arrival of the reflected energy from
the echoing object. As presented, certain target positions were plotted as
height versus time. But height is computed from two parameters: (1) the
measured time delay, which is a very good indication of range; and (2) the
measured vertical angle of arrival, which may not be a valid representation of
the vertical direction to the target. In particular, when ducting occurs,
reflections from distant and distinct surface targets (buildings, bridges, trucks,
etc.) may be received at elevation angles of several degrees, so that a ground
target at a range of 100 kilometers, for example, would appear to represent an
object at a height of several kilometers. Atmospheric turbulence would distort
the duct and could cause sudden changes in angle of perhaps a few tenths of a
degree, which would be interpreted as a sudden change in altitude of the order
of half a kilometer. The horizontal angle of arrival would also be affected by
turbulence, adding to the chaotic character of the apparent flight path.
Ducting
to and from distant mountain tops requires less refractive bending than echoes
to and from lower surface areas, and should therefore be more common. This may
explain the concentration of apparent targets over mountains. A test of this
hypothesis would be to place a radio receiver, tuned to the radar frequency, on
or near the top of a mountain associated with unidentified targets. It should
be connected to an antenna that has its unobstructed receiving lobe centered in
the azimuthal direction of the radar and its vertical pattern extending from
zero to at least several degrees in elevation. If ducting does in fact occur,
the occurrence of unidentified radar echoes would be found to be correlated
with major increases in the strengths of the radar signals measured by this
receiver.
Appendix
5: Sprites
V.
R. ESHLEMAN
One
of the optical displays reported by E. Strand may be of special significance as
a tentative bridge across the wide gulf that exists between the UFO and
scientific communities.
Two
women reported an unusual, colored, intermittent light display that slowly
moved over two hours of observation made from a remote cabin in Norway in the
post-midnight hours of August 3, 1991. The sky was clear until the end of the
observation period, when a few clouds moved in. The key point about this
display is that while there was no local thunderstorm activity, there was an
electrical storm in the direction of the display, but the storm was 120
kilometers away. For decades, it has been conventional scientific wisdom that
all of the visible electrical activity of such storms is within and below the
clouds, that in this case would have been below the observers' horizon.
Recent
developments in the observations and theory of electrical activity in the high
atmosphere (mesosphere and low ionosphere) demonstrate that this conventional
wisdom is in error (see, for instance, Pasko et al., 1996; Sentman &
Wescott, 1995). Some of the reports of observations in the Hessdalen area could
be related to phenomena that occur above storms, up to an altitude of nearly
100 kilometers, well above the observers' horizon. This electrical activity
goes by the names of "blue jets," " red sprites," and
"short-lived elves." There have in fact been sporadic reports of
these phenomena decades ago, but these reports were dismissed by the
"experts." Now these events have been captured on film and video.
This
example can serve to remind us of the continual development and change that
occurs in all fields of scientific knowledge, and of the potential advantages
of open communication between the purported experts and interested amateur
observers.
Appendix
6: SETI and UFO Investigations Compared
V.
R. ESHLEMAN
My
perception is that the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) and UFO
studies of a decade ago shared positions beyond the pale of "respectable"
science. They no doubt still do in the view of many scientists. However there
have been several fundamental advances during the past few years that
indirectly provide some increase in plausibility for both areas, and the SETI
community seems to be responding with renewed vigor. It may be useful for our
panel to consider some UFO-SETI comparisons, and the different cultures of
their respective participants. These are my personal and incomplete thoughts on
this subject.
There
have been recent advances concerning the question of the possible existence and
state of extraterrestrial life (ETL). Knowledge that there is such life would
increase the presumptive probability of extraterrestrial intelligent life
(ETIL). SETI investigators search for the latter mainly by examining the radio
spectrum for telltale electromagnetic signals that may be purposely sent or
inadvertently leaked from a technological society. UFO investigators may invoke
visitation by ETIL as a fallback or default explanation of an apparition or
event which they believe cannot be explained any other way. There are huge gaps
in our knowledge that must be filled in before we can pretend to understand
either of these subjects.
With
regard to the first question, the existence and possible abode of ETL, three
major recent developments are of particular note:
16.It is only in the last few years
that we have finally obtained direct evidence of the existence a
planetary-sized body orbiting a star other than our Sun. We now have evidence
for several (of order of 10), and more are being discovered as the Doppler
observational technique is being improved. There are billions of stars in our
galaxy alone, and these results suggest that stars may quite generally be
accompanied by planets. One may expect that conditions on these planets would
vary over a wide range, at least as wide as the range covered by the planets of
our solar system. (See, for instance, Cosmovici et al., 1997.)
17.Life that is fundamentally different
from nearly all near-surface life on Earth has been found deep in terrestrial
rock and in the deep ocean, where it exists under conditions long assumed to be
so hostile as to be sterile. It would appear that near-surface and subterranean
life forms are essentially independent and that either could exist without the
other. It is also possible that life started several different times on Earth
after epochs of total extinction caused by asteroidal and cometary impacts.
These new findings suggest that life might have started independently at two
levels on Earth, or that life can adapt to extraordinarily different
environments. The development of life, under conditions that are thought to be
favorable and under conditions that we previously thought to be unfavorable,
may be the rule rather than the exception for the innumerable planets that
probably exist in our galaxy. (See, for instance, Cosmovici et al., 1997.)
18.A meteorite found in Antarctica and
known to have come from Mars (from isotopic "fingerprinting" of its
elements) has several detailed internal characteristics (structural, chemical,
and elemental) that may, it is claimed, be attributed to effects of ancient
microscopic life indigenous to Mars. (McKay et al.,1996). This interpretation
is controversial and research on this and other meteorites is continuing.
These
subjects are currently being investigated widely and were featured among the
many areas discussed at an international meeting in July 1996 held in Capri,
Italy, on the subject of Astronomical and Biochemical Origins and the Search
for Life in the Universe (Cosmovici et al.,1997). About 200 astronomers,
biologists, chemists, physicists, and other scientists from 27 countries met
for this Fifth International Conference on Bioastronomy and Colloquium No. 161
of the International Astronomical Union. This meeting was supported by
international and national scientific organizations including the International
Astronomical Union, the International Scientific Radio Union, the National
Aeronautical and Space Administration, the European Space Agency, the Consiglio
Nazionale delle Richerche, and other Italian organizations; clearly, this was a
mainstream scientific meeting. The SETI community was very visibly represented
in all aspects of the conference, but the problem posed by UFO reports was
never mentioned.
However,
the UFO and SETI communities share defining attributes including a surfeit of
putative evidence that remains unidentified, and the lack of a single example
that can be unequivocally verified, repeated, understood, or captured. That is,
both are subject areas of investigation that totally lack identified objects.
Then why is one moving into the mainstream of acceptable science while the
other is not?
It
may not be generally realized that the several different groups of SETI
observers have received and tabulated an appreciable number of URS, or
unidentified radio signals, in the course of listening to billions of radio
channels for hundreds of thousands of hours, looking in tens of thousands of
directions. They measure signals that are noise and signals that range up to
many times stronger than can be explained in terms of natural noise. They
identify nearly all of the strong signals as coming from radio and TV stations,
from military radars and various kinds of communications systems, from
satellites and deep space probes launched by various national and international
organizations, and from many kinds of equipment that leak electromagnetic
energy over broad spectral bands. After very thoughtful and vigorous winnowing,
there has been a residual number of strong signals received by every group that
are, and will no doubt remain, unidentified. But these are not described and
released to the media as something unusual or mysterious. This is because they
could not be verified by other observers or by repeat observations at the same
frequency and in the same direction in the sky. Improved techniques and
protocols are being developed to markedly reduce the frequency of URS (even to
the point where there may be concern that a real ETI signal could be
discarded). Nevertheless, it is to be expected that continuing URS will persist
in the SETI endeavor, and will remain unidentified and undiscussed.
The
SETI participants include a large fraction of scientifically trained radio
astronomers, and they employ complex and expensive equipment that includes the
largest antennas and most sensitive electronic and digital systems in the
world. The UFO community is much broader and diverse, and cannot bring to bear
the instrumental firepower that is routine in SETI research. In fact, no
equipment is involved in most UFO case studies. The nature of UFO phenomena is
such that it would be unreasonable to demand repeat observations of the same
kind of incident and independent confirmation of events by different observers.
However,
the status of UFO studies may be improved if we can find a way to move in a
direction where independent confirmation and repeatability could be realized
and become routine. Where some level of repeatability exists but explanations
are incomplete (e.g., in the Hessdalen project), more investigative resources
are clearly required. Open channels of communication between UFO investigators
and a broader scientific group may lead to natural explanations of many
observations and thereby winnow the numerous reports to a few notable examples
to which intense cooperative efforts could be applied.
Appendix
7: Further Thoughts on SETI and UFO Investigations
•F. LOUANGE
The
SETI and UFO problems may or may not be related to each other. As there does
not so far exist any proof concerning this question, it seems wise to keep
those two problems apart and not to confuse them. The questions raised by the
UFO and SETI problems are not at all comparable, and the strategies for their
research are drastically different. The SETI problem corresponds to a one-bit
theoretical question: does there exist, elsewhere in the universe, any form of
intelligence that has reached the technological level of transmitting
intelligent electromagnetic signals that humans could detect and identify?
Although this question is undoubtedly exciting and justified by existing
probabilistic computations about the existence of planets, the appearance of
life, the duration of a civilization, etc., the final answer is theoretically
Yes or No. However, only a Yes answer will be final, since a No answer may be
revised in view of technical improvements of detection techniques.
The
UFO problem arises from the verified existence of a very large and coherent set
of testimonies worldwide. Its approach is bound to be in three steps:
Step
1. Try by all means to identify the stimulus that has led to the report: the
report may be due to inadequate information, misinterpretation of a familiar
phenomenon or device, an unusual astronomical or atmospheric phenomenon, an
unusual technological device, or a hoax (perpetrated by the reporter or on the
reporter).
Step
2. If Step 1 has not yielded an explanation of the report, try to characterize
the event that led to the report and compare it with other case descriptions.
Step
3. For any case that is strong in testimony and rich in detail, one should try
to define a model. In this activity, we are clearly not dealing with a simple
question with a Yes /No (one-bit) answer. Different cases require analyses with
different levels of complexity.
The
SETI and UFO problems also involve different approaches. Scientists may pursue
the SETI project and remain in a very familiar environment: the relevant
technological area is clearly identified and one may follow a predefined
strategy by specifying the frequency search band, the required receiver
sensitivity, the intrinsic properties of an intelligent signal, etc. On the
other hand, research on the UFO problem is necessarily complex,
multidisciplinary, unpredictable and must be expected to evolve as research
progresses. The basic detection is usually carried out by unprepared human
beings, and analysis may call upon a wide range of disciplines including human
perception, psychology, astronomy, image processing, physics, chemistry, etc.
Moreover, effective research in this field must be conducted with an open mind.
Although
in public opinion the UFO and SETI projects are closely associated, they should
be kept clearly separated as far as serious research is concerned. The
questions being addressed are quite different in nature: the SETI project aims
at a simple Yes/No answer to the question of the existence of extraterrestrial
intelligence, whereas research into the UFO project must be pursued with a
completely open mind as to the questions that need to be posed and answered.
Moreover, the respective technical strategies have nothing in common: SETI
research is carried out primarily within the established framework of radio
astronomy, whereas UFO research is necessarily multidisciplinary and
innovative.
Appendix
8: Scientific Inference
P.
A. STURROCK
In
attempting to resolve a complex problem such as that posed by UFO reports, one
is very much in the "gray area" of scientific research that is not
well defined: the facts are to some extent shaky; some of the hypotheses are
speculative; and it is not clear how to evaluate the hypotheses on the basis of
the facts and of other relevant information. Furthermore, one has the
difficulty of relating the analysis of individual reports ("Is this report
due to a hoax?") to the global questions represented by the hypotheses
("Are some reports due to hoaxes?"). In such a situation, it is
essential to have some way to organize one's analysis of whatever research is
being conducted. Scientific inference is the intellectual basis of science, and
the procedures of scientific inference offer a framework for organizing such
analyses. (See, for instance, Good, 1950; Jeffreys, 1973.)
The
formalism of scientific inference involves expressing all judgments in terms of
probabilities. Where there are definite rules for deriving probabilities from
the evidence, these rules can be used; otherwise, the probabilities may be
regarded as subjective. If each judgment is made by several investigators, this
can provide both a mean or consensus estimate and a measure of the degree of
uncertainty of that estimate. For a recent exposition of this formalism, see
for instance Sturrock (1994d)
In
investigating any specific case, it is necessary to work with a complete and
mutually exclusive set of hypotheses. The following set of 8 hypotheses was
used in Sturrock's survey of the members of the American Astronomical Society
(Sturrock, 1994a; 1994b; 1994c):
a.
Hoax,
b.
Some well established phenomenon or device,
c.
Some well established but unfamiliar natural phenomenon,
d.
Some unfamiliar terrestrial technological device,
e.
Some hitherto unknown natural phenomenon,
f.
A technological device not of terrestrial origin,
g.
Some other cause which [the investigator] can specify, and
h.
Some other cause which [the investigator] cannot specify. An investigator may
begin by assigning "prior probabilities" to these hypotheses,
although this is not essential. If so, each value must be greater than zero and
less than unity, and they must sum to unity. Once these prior probabilities
have been assigned, the investigator should then forget about his prejudices.
Bayes'
theorem then provides a mechanism for updating one's assessment of
probabilities on the basis of new evidence. The new evidence may be a single
case or an analysis of a catalog of cases. When measurements are made in terms
of "log-odds" defined by log[(p/(1 - p)] rather than the probability
pitself, it turns out that investigators with very different prejudices should
assign the same weight of evidence, measured by the change in log-odds, to the
same experimental or observational data. Hence, although they may differ in
their prejudices, they should be able to agree in their assessments of the
evidence.
It
is even more convenient to work in terms of the quantity 10*log[p/(1-p)], since
one may then use the familiar engineering term "db" or
"decibel" to represent an assessment. For instance, if one begins
with the assessment that the probability of an event being due to an
extraterrestrial vehicle is 10-6, one could rephrase that as saying "my
assessment is -60 db." If a certain research program made that proposition
even more unlikely by, say, 10 db, one would then lower that assessment to -70
db. If, on the other hand, the evidence seemed to support that hypothesis with
weight 10 db, the resulting assessment would be -50 db. If six separate and
completely independent studies were each to yield evidence of 10 db, the
investigator would end up with an assessment of 0 db, which represents even
odds of the proposition being true. That is, the evidence would have been just
sufficient to change the mind of the investigator from being highly skeptical
about the hypothesis to considering it just as likely to be true as not true.
It
is highly unlikely that any research project that is in operation for only one
or two years will solve the UFO problem. However, it could and should provide
useful relevant evidence, and that evidence should lead to a measurable change
in the assessments of an interested scientist. In an area such as that of UFO
research, that is all that can be expected. On the other hand, several research
projects, each lasting a reasonable length of time, should provide sufficient
evidence that an hypothesis may be effectively definitely established or
definitely rejected.
If
these suggestions are considered to have merit, they could be developed into a
more specific and more useful form by means of a workshop that brings together
UFO investigators, professional investigators (of accidents, failures, etc.),
physical scientists, and statisticians.
UFO TOPICS
The Project Bluebook Unknowns, Complete
July 3, 1947; Harborside, Maine. 2:30 p.m. EDT. Witness:
astronomer John Cole of South Brooksville, Me. Watched 10-15
seconds while ten very light objects, with two dark forms to
their left, moved like a swarm of bees to the northwest. A loud
roar was heard.
July 4, 1947; over Emmet, Idaho. 8:17 p.m. PDT. Witnesses:
United Air Lines Capt. E.J. Smith, First Officer Ralph Stevens,
Stewardess Marty Morrow. Watched for 12-15 minutes while four
objects with flat bottoms and rough tops moved at varying speeds,
with one high and to the right of the others.
July 6, 1947; Fairfield-Suisan Air Base, California. Daytime.
Witnesses: Army Air Forces Capt. and Mrs. James Burniston.
Watched for 1 minute while one object having no wings or tail
rolled from side-to-side three times and then flew away very fast
to the southeast.
July 8, 1947; Muroc Air Base, California. 9:30 a.m. PDT.
Witnesses: lst Lt. Joseph McHenry, T/Sgt Ruvolo, S/Sgt Nauman,
Miss Janette Scotte. Watched for an unstated length of time
while two disc-shaped or spherical objects--silver and apparently
metallic--flew a wide circular pattern, and then one of them
later flew a tighter circle.
July 9, 1947; Meridian, Idaho. 12:17 p.m. PDT. Witness: Idahostatesman aviation editor and former (AAF) B-29 pilot Dave
Johnson. Watched for more than 10 seconds from an Idaho Air
National Guard AT-6 while a black disc, which stood out against
the clouds, made a half-roll and then a stair-step climb.
July 10, 1947; Harmon Field, Newfoundland, Canada. Between 3 and
5 p.m. local time. Witnesses: three ground crewmen, including
Mr. Leidy, for Pan American Airways. Watched briefly while one
translucent disc- or wheel-shaped object flew very fast, leaving
a dark blue trail and then ascended and cut a path through the
clouds.
July 29, 1947; Hamilton Air Base, California. 2:50 p.m. PDT.
Witnesses: Assistant Base Operations Officer Capt. William
Rhyerd, ex-AAF B-29 pilot Ward Stewart. Watched for unknown
length of time while two round, shiny, white objects with
estimated 15-25 foot diameters, flew 3-4 times the apparent speed
of a P-80, also in sight. One object flew straight and level;
the other weaved from side-to-side like an escort fighter.
Sept. 3, 1947; Oswego, Oregon. 12:15 p.m. PDT. Witness:
housewife Mrs. Raymond Dupui. Watched for unknown length of time
as 12-15 round, silver objects flew an unstated pattern.
Oct., 1947; Dodgeville, Wisconsin. 11
unnamed civilian man. Watched for 1 hour while an undescribed
object flew counterclockwise circles.
Oct. 14, 1947; 11 mi. NNE of Cave Creek, Arizona. Noon MDT.
Witnesses: ex-AAF fighter pilot J.L. Clark, civilian pilot
Anderson, third man. Watched 45-60 seconds while one 3-foot
"flying wing"-shaped object, which looked black against the white
clouds and red against the blue sky, flew straight at an
estimated 380 m.p.h., at 8-10,000 feet, from NW to SE.
April 5, 1948; Holloman AFB, New Mexico. Afternoon. Witnesses:
Geophysics Lab balloon observers Alsen, Johnson, Chance. Two
irregular, round, white or golden objects. One made three loops
then rose and disappeared rapidly; the other flew in a fast arc
to the west during the 3O^second sighting.
July 29, 1948: Indianapolis, Indiana. 9:88 a.m. witness*:
James Toney, Robert Huggins, both employees of a rug cleaning
firm. One shiny aluminum object, shaped something like an
airplane's propeller, with 10-12 small cups protruding from
either blade. Estimated size 6-8' long, 1.5-2' wide. The object
glided across the road a few hundred feet in front of their
vehicle and apparently went down in a wooded area. Sighting
lasted a few seconds.
July 31, 1948; Indianapolis, Indiana. 8:25 a.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. Vernon Swigert; he was an electrician. Object was
shaped like a cymbal, or domed disc; about 20' across and 6-8'
thick, and was white without any shine. It flew straight and
level from horizon to horizon in about 10 seconds, shimmering in
the sun as if spinning.
July or August, 1948; vicinity of Marion, Virginia. Shortly
after sunset. Witness: Max Abbott, flying a Bellanca Cruisair
four-passenger private airplane. A single bright white light
accelerated and turned up a valley.
Sept. 23, 1948; San Pablo, California. 12 noon. Witnesses:
Sylvester Bentham and retired U.S. Army Col. Horace Eakins. Two
objects: one, a buff or grey rectangle with vertical lines; the
other a translucent "amoeba" with a dark spot near the center.
The arms of the "amoeba" undulated. Both objects travelled very
fast.
Oct. 15, 1948; Fusuoka, Japan. 11:05 p.m. Witnesses: pilot
Halter and radar operator Hemphill of a P-61 "Black Widow" night
fighter. Up to six objects tracked on radar, only one seen
visually. Dull or dark object shaped like a dirigible with a
flat bottom and clipped tail end. Six seen on radar separately
Pilot attempted to close on visual object, but it dove away fast.
Dec. 3, 1948; Fairfield-Suisan AFB, California. 8:15 p.m.
Witness: USAF Sgt., control tower operator. One round, white
light flew for 25 seconds with varying speed, bouncing motion,
and finally a rapid erratic climb.
Jan. 4, 1949; Hickam Field, Hawaii. 2 p.m. Witness: USAF pilot
Capt. Paul Storey, on ground. one flat white, elliptical object
with a matte top circled while oscillating to the right and left,
and then sped away.
Jan. 27, 1949; Cortez-Bradenton, Florida. 10:20 p.m. Witnesses:
Capt. Sames, acting chief of the Aircraft Branch, Eglin AFB, and
Mrs. Sames. They watched for 25 minutes while a cigar-shaped
object as long as two Pullman cars and having seven lighted
square windows and throwing sparks, descended and then climbed
with a bouncing motion at an estimated 400 m.p.h.
March 17, 1949; Camp Hood, Texas. 7:52 p.m. Witnesses: guards
of the 2nd Armored Division. While awaiting the start of a
flare firing, they watched, for an hour, while eight large,
green, red and white flare-like objects flew in generally
straight lines.
April 3, 1949; Dillon, Montana. 11:55 a.m. Witnesses:
construction company owner Gosta Miller and three other unnamed
persons. One object shaped like two plates attached
face-to-face; matte bottom, bright aluminum top; 20' diameter,
4-5' thickness. It rocked or rotated in six cycles, descended,
rocked, flew, rocked; all this was very fast.
April 4, 1949; Merced, California. 10:20 p.m. witness: William
Parrott, former Air Force pilot and major. One generally round
object with a curved bottom and dull coloring. The object gave
off a clicking sound until overhead. Parrott's dog reacted. 35
seconds.
April 24, 1949; Arrey, New Mexico. l0:30 a.m. Witnesses:
General Mills meteorologist and balloon expert C.B. Moore and
others on a balloon launch crew. One white, round ellipsoid,
about 2.5 times as long as wide.
April 28, 1949; Tucson, Arizona. 5:45 p.m. Witnesses: Howard
Hann, Mr. Hubert, Tex Keahey. One bright, sausage-shaped object
was observed for 40 minutes while it rolled and flew fast.
May 5, 1949; Ft. Bliss, Texas. 11:40 a.m. Witnesses: Army
officers Maj. Day, Maj. Olhausen, Capt. Vaughn. Two oblong white
discs, flying at an estimated 200-250 m.p.h., made a shallow turn
during the 30-50 second observation.
May 6, 1949; Livermore, California. 9:35 a.m. Witness: C. G.
Green. Two shiny, disc-like objects rotated around each other
and banked. Then one shot upwards with a grey trail and rejoined
the other. The sighting lasted 5 minutes.
May 9, 1949; Tucson, Arizona. 2:30 p.m. Witness: M/Sgt. Troy
Putnam. Two round, flat silvery objects, estimated to be 25' in
diameter, flew 750-1,000 m.p.h. in a banked but steady manner.
May 27, 1949; South-central Oregon. 2:25 p.m. Witness: Joseph
Shell, ferrying SNJ trainer for North American Aviation, from Red
Bluff, California, to Burns, Oregon. Five to eight oval objects,
twice as long as wide, and 1/5 as thick. They flew in trail
formation, with an interval equal to 3-4 times their length,
except that the second and third were closer together.
July 24, 1949; Mountain Home, Idaho. 12 noon. Witness: Henry
Clark, manager of a flying service, flying a Piper Clipper.
Seven delta-shaped objects, 35-55' in span, 20-30' long, 2-5'
thick; light colored except for a 12' diameter dark circle at the
rear of each. They flew in a tight formation of twos with one
behind, and made a perfect, but unbanked, turn. During the
10 minute sighting, they displayed decreasing smooth
oscillations. Clark's engine ran rough during the sighting, and
upon landing was found to have all its spark plugs burned out.
July 30, 1949; Mt. Hood, Oregon. 9 p.m. Witnesses: Northwest
Airlines Capt. Thrush, two Portland control tower operators, and
one flying instructor. One object with one white light and two
red lights, maneuvered and hovered.
Feb 5, 1950; Teaticket, Massachusetts. 5:10 p.m. Witnesses:
Marvin Odom, former U.S. Navy, USAF Lt. PhilipFoushee, pilot from Otis AFB, and two others. Two thin,
illuminated cylinders, one of which dropped a fireball,
maneuvered together and then disappeared high and fast after 5
minutes.
Feb. 24, 1950; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 1:55 p.m. Witnesses:
Municipal Airport Weather Observers Luther McDonald, Harrison
Manson. One white, slightly elongated oval was watched for 1.5
minutes through a theodolite while it flew straight and level.
Feb. 25, 1950; Los Alamos, New Mexico. 3:55 p.m. Witnesses:
Twelve Atomic Energy Commission security inspectors. One
cylinder with tapered ends, silver and flashing, flew slow and
hen fast, fluttered and oscillated, and changed course.
observations by individuals varied from 3 seconds to 2 minutes.
march 3, 1950; Selfridge AFB, Michigan. 11:05 p.m. Witness:
st Lt Frank Mattson. One intense, dull yellowish light
descended vertically, then flew straight and level very fast for
4 minutes.
March 20, 1950; Stuggart, Arkansas. 9:26 p.m. Witnesses:
Chicago & Southern Airlines Capt. Jack Adams, First Officer G. W.
Anderson, Jr. One 100' circular disc with 9-12 portholes along
the lower side emitting a soft purple light, and a light at the
top which flashed 3 times in 9 seconds, flew at not less than
1,000 m.p.h. It was seen for 25-35 seconds.
March 27, 1980; Motobo, Okinawa. 10:30 a.m. Witness: USAF
radar operator Cpl. Bolfango. Tracked on radar for 2 minutes
while it was stationary and then moved at 500 m.p.h.. Visual
observation not detailed, only mentioned in summary.
March 28, 1950; Santiago, Chile. 3:15 p.m. Witness: M/Sgt.
Patterson, of the office of the U.S. Air Attache. One white
object observed for 5-10 seconds through binoculars while it flew
high and fast, crossing 30^ of sky.
March 29, 1950; Marrowbore Lake, Tennessee. 7 a.m. Witnesses:
real estate salesmen Whiteside and Williams. Six-twelve dark
objects shaped like 300-lb. bombs, estimated 5 feet long. Flew
500 m.p.h. and descended, making a noise like wind blowing
through the trees.
April 8, 1950; Kokomo, Indiana. 2 a.m. Witness: Earl Baker.
One grey metallic disc, 50' in diameter, 15' thick; top-shaped
with a "conning tower" at the top and three ports on the rim
giving off a blue light. It hovered for 2 minutes, then flew
away. Baker aroused from sleep by his dog.
April 14, 1950; Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey. 2:30 p.m. Witness:
Army M/Sgt. James. Four rectangular, amber objects, about 3' by
4'. changed speed and direction rapidly; the group of objects
rose and fell during the 3-4 minute sighting.
May 7, 1950; Nine miles sough of Ely, Nevada. 6:45 p.m.
Witnesses: Mr. and Mrs. George Smith and their grandson. One
silvery white object hovered at 100' altitude, moved back and
forth for 10 minutes and then flew up and away. Note in case
file: "No investigation."
June 27, 1950; Texarkana, Texas. 7:50 a.m. Witnesses: Terrelland Yates, employees of Red River Arsenal. One object, bright,
shaped like two dishpans face-to-face, flew straight and level,
fast for 4-5 seconds.
July 13, 1950; Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. 5 p.m. Witnesses:
two skilled Arsenal employees including Mr. Washburn. one
object, shaped like a bowtie, and like polished aluminum. Flew
straight and level, then one triangle rotated 1/4 turn in the
opposite direction and returned to its original position. The
object then made a right-angle turn and accelerated away after at
least 30 seconds.
Aug. 4, 1950; approx. 100 mi. SE of New York City (39' 35' N.,
72' 24.5' W.). 10 a.m. EDT. Witnesses: Master Nils Lewring,
Chief Mate Jacob Koelwyn, Third Mate, of M/V Marcala. One 10'
cylindrical object at 50-100' altitude, flying with a churning or
rotary motion, accelerated at end of 15 second sighting.
Aug. 20, 1950; Nicosia, Cyprus. 1:30 p.m. Witnesses: USAF MATS
liaison officer Lt. William Ghormley, Col. W. V. Brown, Lt.
col. L.w. Brauer. One small, round, bright object flew fast,
straight and level for 15-20 seconds.
Aug. 25, 1950; approx. 250 mi. SW of Bermuda (29' 40' N., 67*
28' W.). 8 p.m. Witness: B-29 radarman S/Sgt. William Shaffer.
Radar observation, plus possible blue streak 3 minutes later.
B-29 followed unidentified target, then passed it at l/4-mile
distance, target followed for 5 minutes, then passed B-29 and
sped away. Total time of tracking: 20 minutes.
Aug. 30, 1950; Sandy Point, Newfoundland, Canada. 1:30 p.m.
Witnesses: three local employees, including Kaeel and Alexander,
of the Air Force Base. A dark, barrel-shaped object with a pole
down from it into the water, flew at 3-5 m.p.h. and 15-20'
altitude for 5 minutes.
Sept. 3, 1950; Spokane, Washington. 2 p.m. Witnesses: Maj R.J.
Gardiner, Mrs. Gardiner and neighbor (former saw three objects,
others saw one). Metallic bronze discs, 20-30' long, 2-6' thick.
Moved independently and erratically for 5 minutes.
Sept. 20, 1950; Kit Carson, Colorado. 10:49 a.m. Witness
identified only as a "reliable source". Two large, round,
glowing objects and three smaller, internally lit objects. Two
hovered for 1 minute, moved, and three smaller ones came from
behind or within the two larger objects, and all sped upward and
away.
Sept. 21, 1950; Provincetown, Massachusetts. 9:52 a.m. Witness:
M.I.T. research associate and Air National Guard Maj. M.H. Ligda.
Radar tracking of one object during M.I.T tracking of USAF flight
of F-84 or F-86 jet fighters. Object speed was 22 miles/minute
(l,200 m.p.h.), made turn of 11-12 gs acceleration during 1
minute observation.
Oct. 15, 1950; Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 3:20 p.m. Atomic Energy
Commission Trooper Rymer, J. Moneymaker, Capt. Zarzecki. Two
shiny silver objects shaped like bullet or bladder. They dove
with a smoke trail and one vanished. The other hovered at 5-6,
altitude, 50' away, left and returned several times somewhat
further away.
Oct. 15, 1950; Pope AFB, North Carolina. Witness: Daniel.
Listed as "unidentified" in folder index, but no supporting data
could be found.
Oct 15, 1950; Pope AFB, North Carolina. Witness: Woodward.
Same as previous observation.
Oct. 23, 1950; Bonlee, North Carolina. 12:42 p.m. Witness:
ex-USAF pilot Frank Risher. One aluminum object shaped like a
dirigible or Convair C-99 cargo plane, with 3 portholes, arrived
from southeast, hovered 3-5 seconds and flew away to the south-
south-east at end of 40 second sighting.
Nov. 5, 1950, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 11:55 a.m. Witness:
Fairchild Aircraft illustrator Don Patrick. One translucent
object, light grey with dark core, shaped like a pear or bean.
Flew for 5-10 minutes with rapid, darting movements.
Dec. 2, 1950; Nanyika, Kenya. 10:50 a.m. Mr. and Mrs. L. Scott.One pearly, iridescent object with a flattened top, spun while
hovering and made a sound like bees buzzing. Only data in files
was from East African "Standard" newspaper.
Dec. 6, 1950; Ft. Myers, Florida. 5 p.m. Witnesses: former
aircraft purchasing agent Harry Lamp and four boys, using
lO-power binoculars. One 75' object, 3-4' thick, bubble on top,
silver with a red rim having two white and two orange jets along
it. The center revolved when the object hovered; then it flew
away very fast.
Dec. 11, 1950; l0 mi. NW of Gulcana, Alaska. 10:13 p.m.Witnesses: crew of Northwest Air Lines flight 802. Two white
flashes, followed by a dark cloud which rose and split in two.
Jan. 8, 1951; South of Ft. Worth, Texas. 10:45 p.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. W.J. Boggus, plus unidentified drivers and
passengers in other cars stopped to watch. Two groups of red and
green lights in triangular formations were stationary and then
moved.
Jan. 12, 1951, Ft. Benning, Georgia. 10 p.m. Witness: U.S.
Army 2nd Lt. A.C. Hale. One light with a fan-shaped wake
remained motionless like a star about 20 minutes and then sped
away.
Jan 16, 1951; Artesia, New Mexico. Time unknown. Witnesses:
Two members of a balloon project from the General Mills .
Aeronautical Research Laboratory, the manger of the Artesia
Airport, and three pilots. The balloon crew was observing their
110' balloon at an altitude of 112,000' when a dull white, round
object was spotted. It appeared larger than the balloon, but
made no movement. Later, the balloon crew and the others saw
two objects from the airport; flying side-by-side, they circled
the balloon and flew away to the northeast. The second
observation lasted about 40 seconds. Note: there is confusion
over the date of this case, with some USAF records showing it as
1952; however, 1951 appears to be correct.
Feb. 1, 1951; Johnson Air Base, Japan. 5:10 p.m. Witnesses:
pilot and radar operator of F-82 night fighter. One amber light
made three or four 360* turns to the right, reversed toward the
F-82 and then climbed out of sight.
Feb. 21, 1951; Durban, South Africa. 4:55 a.m. Witnesses:
three men in a truck, several other persons, none named. A dark
red, torpedo-shaped object with darker center, flew straight and
level.
Feb. 26, 1951; Ladd AFB, Alaska. 7:10 a.m. Witness: USAF Sgt.
J.B. Sells. One dull grey, metallic object, estimated to be 120'
long and 10-12' thick, hovered, puffed smoke and sped away after
1-1.5 minutes. Note: may have been Feb. 25.
Mar. 10, 1951; Chinnampo, Korea. 9:51 a.m. Witnesses: crew of
USAF B-29 bomber, including scanners and tail gunner. A large
red-yellow glow burst and became blue-white. No further
information in files.
Mar. 13, 1951; McClellan AFB, California. 3:20 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF lst Lt. B.J. Hastie, Mrs. Rafferty. A cylinder with twin
tails, 200' long and 90' wide, turned north and flew at
incredible speed. Two minutes.
Mar. 15, 1951; New Delhi, India. 10:20 a.m. Witnesses: 25
members of a flying club, including the chief aerial engineer and
his two assistants. One metallic cigar-shaped object with white
exhaust which turned black when it accelerated to an estimated
1,000 m.p.h. and made a large loop. Seven minutes.
June 1, 1951; Niagara Falls, New York. 4:20 a.m. Witnesses:
M/Sgt H.E. Sweeney, 2 enlisted men. One glowing yellow-orange,
saucer-shaped object with arc-shaped wings, flew straight up.
Seen for 30-40 seconds.
July 24, 1951; Portsmouth, New Hampshire. 7:10 Witnesses:
Hanscom AFB Operations Officer Capt. Cobb, Cpl. Fein. One
100-200' tubular object, 5 times long as it was wide, with fins
at one end, and colored greyish with many black spots. Flew
800-1,000 m.p.h. at 1-2,000' altitude, leaving a faint swath. 20
seconds.
Aug. 25, 1951; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 9:58 p.m. Witnesses:
Sandia Base Security Guard Hugh Young and wife. A flying wing-
shaped craft passed over their heads at an estimated 800-1,000'
altitude with no sound. Size estimated at 1.5 times wingspan of
B-36 bomber,or 350'. Dark, chordwise stripes on underside, and
6-8 pairs of soft, glowing lights on trailing edge of "wing".
Speed estimated at 300-400 m.p.h., object seen for about 30
seconds.
Aug. 31, ; Matador, Texas. 12:45 p.m. Witnesses: Mrs. Tom
Tilson, one or two other women, all apparently of excellent
reputations. One pear-shaped object with a length of a B-29
fuselage (100'), aluminum or silver with a port or some type of
aperture on the side. It moved with smaller end forward,
drifting slowly at about 150' altitude, then headed up in a
circular fashion and out of sight after a few seconds.
Sept. 6, 1951; Claremont, California. 7:20 p.m. (not really
clear). Witnesses: S/Sgt W.T. Smith, M/Sgt L.L. Duel (?). Six
orange lights in an irregular formation, flew straight and level
into a coastal fog bank after 3-4 minutes.
Sept. 14, 1951; Goose Bay, Labrador, Canada. 9:30 p.m.
Witnesses: T/Sgt W.B. Maupin, Cpl. J.W. Green. Three objects
tracked on radar. Two were on a collision course, then one
evaded to the right upon the request, by radio, of one of the
radar operators! No aircraft were known to be in the area. A
third unidentified track then joined the first two. More than 15
minutes.
Oct. 2, 1951; Columbus, Ohio. 6 p.m. Witness: Battelle
Memorial Institute graduate physicist Howard Cross. One bright
oval with a clipped tail flew straight and level, fading into the
distance after 1 minute.
Oct. 3, 1951; Kadena, Okinawa. 10:27 p.m. Witnesses: radar
operators Sgt. M.W. Watson and Pvt. Gonzales and one other
Sergeant. One large, sausage-shaped blip tracked at an estimated
4,800 m.p.h.
Oct. 9, 1951; Terre Haute, Indiana. 1:42 p.m. Witness: CAA
Chief Aircraft Communicator Roy Messmore at Hulman Municipal
Airport. One round silver object flew directly overhead,
reaching the horizon in 15 seconds. Note: a very similar
incident happened 3 minutes later near Paris, Illinois (15 miles
NW) and was also listed as "unidentified" for several years, but
was eventually reclassified.
Oct. 11, 1951; Minneapolis, Minnesota. 6:30 a.m. Witnesses:
General Mills balloon researchers, including aeronautical
engineer J.J. Kaliszewski, aerologist C.B. Moore, pilot Dick
Reilly in the air, and Doug Smith on the ground. The flight crew
saw the first object, a brightly glowing one with a dark
underside and a halo around it. The object arrived high and
fast, then slowed and made slow climbing circles for about two
minutes, and finally sped away to the east. Soon they saw
another one, confirmed by ground observers using a theodolite,
which sped across the sky. Total time first object was seen was
5 minutes, second was a few seconds.
Nov. 18, 1951; Washington, D.C. 3:20 a.m. Witnesses: Crew of
Capital Airlines DC-4 Fliqht 610, Andrews AFB Senior air traffic
controller Tom Selby. One object with several lights, followed
the DC-4 for about 20 minutes and then turned back.
Nov. 24, 1951; Mankato, Minnesota. 33:53 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
or ANG pilots W.H. Fairbrother and D.E. Stewart in P-51 Mustangs.
One milky white object shaped like Northrop flying wing (broad,
slightly swept-back wing with no fuselage or tail). Estimated 8'
span. Flew straight and level for 5 seconds.
Dec. 7, 1951; Sunbury, Ohio. 4:30 p.m. Witness: amateur
astronomer Carl Loar. One silvery sphere seen through telescope.
Two specks sighted at sides, object seemed to explode and was
replaced by a dark cloud and many specks. 30 minutes.
Dec. 7, 1951; Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 8:15 a.m. Witness: Atomic
Energy Commission guard J.H. Collins. One 20' square object,
white-grey but not shiny flew above ridge to clouds and back
again twice, taking 30-40 seconds each time.
Feb. 11, 1952; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3 a.m. Witnesses:
Capt. G.P. Arns and Maj. R.J. Gedson flying a Beech AT-ll
trainer. One yellow-orange comet-shaped object pulsed flame for
1-2 seconds of a 1 minute straight and level flight.
Feb. 23, 1952; over North Korea. 11:15 p.m. Witness:
Captain/B-29 navigator. One bluish cylinder, three times long as
wide, with a tail and rapid pulsations, came in high and fast,
made several turns and levelled out under B-29 which was evading
mild antiaircraft fire. 45 second sighting.
March 20, 1952; Centreville, Maryland. 10:42 p.m. Witnesses:
WWl/WW2 veteran A.D. Hutchinson and son. One dull orange-yellow
saucer-shaped light flew straight and level very fast for 30
seconds.
March 23, 1952; Yakima, Washington. 6:56 and 7 p.m.
Witnesses: pilot and radar operator of F-94 jet interceptor. On
either occasion, a red fireball increased in brightness and then
faded over 45 second span. Stationary both times. Note:
Project Blue Book Status Report #7 (May 31, 1952) says target was
also tracked by ground radar at 78 knots (90 m.p.h.) at 22,500'
and 25,000' altitude.
March 24, 1952; 60 miles west of Pt. Concepcion, California.
8:45 a.m. Witnesses: B-29 navigator and radar operator. One
target tracked for 20-30 seconds at estimated 3,000 m.p.h.
March 29, 1952; 20 miles north of Misawa AFB, Japan. 11:20 a.m.
Witness: Brigham, pilot of AT-6 trainer. One small, very thin,
shiny metallic disc flew alongside the AT-6, then made a pass at
an F-84 jet fighter, flipped on edge, fluttered 20' from the
F-84's fuselage and flipped in the slipstream...all in 10
seconds.
April 4, 1952; Duncanville, Texas. 7:30 p.m. Witnesses: two
radar operators of the 147th AC&W Squadron. One object was
tracked for one minute by radar at an estimated 2,160 m.p.h.
April 5, 1952; Phoenix, Arizona. l0:40 a.m. Witnesses: Mr. and
Mrs. L.G. Ryan, R.L. Stokes, D. Schook. One large, dull grey
circular object, followed by two more, flew straight and level at
high speed.
April 5, 1952; Miami, Florida. 9:15 p.m. Witnesses: L.E.
VanDercar and 9 year old son. Four dark circular objects with
mostly fuzzy edges, crossed face of Moon; each was half the
apparent diameter of Moon. 2:59 p.m. Witness: H.L. Russell.
April 6, 1952; Temple, Texas. 2:59 p.
50-75 grey-white discs changed position within formation
continually, tilted in unison every 12-15 seconds during 3.8
minute sighting.
April 12, 1952; North Bay, Ontario, Canada. 9:30 p.m.
Witnesses: Royal Canadian Air Force Warrant Officer E.H.
Rossell, Flight Sgt. R. McRae. One round amber object flew fast,
stopped, reversed direction, climbed away at 30' angle during a 2
minute observation.
April 14, 1952; LaCrosse, Wisconsin. 12:35 p.m. Witness:
unidentified CAL airline pilot. Several light colored objects
flew in V-formation. No further details in files.
April 14, 1952; Memphis, Tennessee. 6:34 p.m. Witnesses: U.S.
Navy pilots Lt. jg. Blacky, Lt. jg. O'Neil. One inverted bowl,
3' long and 1' high, with vertical slots, flew fast, straight and
level, 100 yards from observers' aircraft for 45-60 seconds.
April 15, 1952; Santa Cruz, California. 7:40 p.m. Witness: Mr.
Hayes, brother of Master Sergeant. Two faint objects observed
flying fast along the horizon for 6-8 seconds, using 20x spotting
telescope.
April 17, 1952; Longmeadow, Massachusetts. 8:30 p.m. Witnesses:
S.B. Brooks, chemical engineer J.A. Eaton. One round, deep
orange object flew fast and erratic, occasionally emitting a
shaft of light to the rear during a 40 minute sighting.
April 17, 1952; Yuma, Arizona. 3:05 p.m. Witnesses: group of
Army weather observation students, including several graduate
engineers. One flat-white, circular object flew with an
irregular trajectory and a brief trail, for about 7 seconds.
April 18, 1952; Yuma, Arizona. Time unknown. Witnesses: two
Army weather observation students. One flat-white circular
object flew for 5-10 seconds in a very erratic manner.
April 18, 1952; Bethesda, Maryland. l1:30 a.m. Witnesses: R.
Poerstal and three other men. Seven to nine circular,
orange-yellow lights in a 40^ V-formation flew overhead silently
for 4-8 seconds, from south to north.
April 18, 1952; Corner Brook, Newfoundland, Canada. l0:l0 p.m.
Witness: reporter Chic Shave. One round, yellow-gold object
flew south and returned during 1.5 minute sighting.
April 18, 1952; 50 miles northwest of Kyushu, Japan (129* 51' E.,
34' 19' N.). Witness: one radar operator. Tracked unidentified
target for 1 minute at 2,700 m.p.h.
April 18, 1952; Corner Brook, Newfoundland, Canada. 4 a.m.
Witness: janitor C. Hamilton. One yellow-gold object made a
sharp turn and left a short, dark trail during l minute sighting.
April 22, 1952; Naha AFB, Okinawa. 99 p.m. Witnesses: crew of
B-29 bomber, on ground. One elliptical object, followed by two
and then another two, each with a white light that blinked every
1-2 seconds as they performed erratic maneuvers for 10 minutes.
April 24, 1952; Bellevue Hill, Vermont. 5 a.m. Witnesses: crew
of USAF C-124 transport plane. Three circular, bluish objects in
loose "fingertip" formation twice flew parallel to airplane
during 3-4 minute period.
April 24, 1952; Milton, Massachusetts. 2:30 p.m. Witnesses:
three Cambridge Research Center electronics engineers, one named
Buruish. Two flat, red squares flew wobbly in level flight,
climbed, levelled out during 1.5 minute observation.
April 24, 1952; Clovis, New Mexico. 8:10 p.m. Witness: USAF
light Surgeon Maj. E.L. Ellis. Many orange-amber lights,
sometimes separate, sometimes fused, behaved erratically. Speed
varied from motionless to very fast during 5 minute sighting.
April 27, 1952; Roseville, Michigan. 4:15 p.m. Witnesses: H.A.
Freytag and three male relatives, including a minister. One
silver oval rolled, descended and stopped. Two silver cigar-
shaped objects appeared, one departing to the east and one to the
west. A third silver cigar-shaped object flew by at high speed.
Sightings lasted 45 minutes.
April 27, 1952; Yuma, Arizona. 8:30 p.m. Witnesses: M/Sgt. and
Mrs. G.S. Porter (he was off-duty control tower operator).
Bright red or flame-colored discs, appearing as large as fighter
planes. Seven sightings of one disc, one of two in formation
during 2 hours. All seen below 11,000' overcast.
April 29, 1952; Marshall, Texas. 3:30 p.m. Witness: private
pilot R.R. Weidman. One round, white object which flew straight,
with a side-to-side oscillation for 1.5 minutes.
April 29, 1952; Goodland, Kansas. 100 p.m. Witness: B-29
bombardier Lt. R.H. Bauer. One white fan-shaped light pulsed 3-4
times per second for 2 seconds.
May 1, 1952; Moses Lake, Washington. 5:32 a.m. Witnesses: Two
Atomic Energy Commission employees, Eggan and Shipley. One
silver object without wings flew straight and level for 1.5
minutes.
May 1, 1952; George AFB, California. 10:50 a.m. Witnesses:
three men on the arms range, plus one Lt. Colonel 4 miles away.
Five flat-white discs about the diameter of a C-47's wingspan
(95') flew fast, made a 90^ turn in a formation of three in front
and two behind, and darted around, for 15-30 seconds.
May 5, 1952; Tenafly, New Jersey. 10:45 p.m. Witness: Mrs.
M.M. Judson. Six or seven translucent, cream-yellow objects. One
moved in an ellipse, while the others moved in and out.
May 7, 1952; Keesler AFB, Mississippi. 12:15 p.m. Witnesses:
Capt. Morris, a Master Sergeant, a Staff Sergeant, and an Airman
First Class. Ten times, an aluminum or silver cylindrical object
was seen to dart in and out of the clouds during a 5-10 minute
period.
May 9, 1952; George AFB, California. 5:20 p.m. Witness: A/lc
G.C. Grindeland. One dull white, arrowhead-shaped object flew
straight and level for 10 seconds.
May 10, 1952; Ellenton, South Carolina. 10:45 p.m. Witnesses:
4 duPont employees at the Savannah River nuclear plant. Up to
four yellow, disc-shaped objects were seen on five occasions
between 10:45 and shortly after 11:15.
May 14, 1952; Mayaquez, Puerto Rico. 7 p.m. Witnesses:
Attorney and ex-USAF pilot Mr. Stipes, Sr. Garcia-Mendez. Two
shining orange spheres: one was stationary, while the other
darted away and back for 30 minutes.
May 20, 1952; Houston, Texas. l0:l0 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
pilots Capt. J. Spurgin and Capt. BB. Stephan. One bright or
white oval object moved from side-to-side while making a gradual
turn for 90 seconds.
May 25, 1952; Walnut Lake, Michigan. 9:15 p.m. Witnesses:
seven persons, including John Hoffman, his family and friends.
One large white circular object having dark sections on its rim,
flew straight and level for 30 minutes, appearing red when behind
a cloud.
May 28, 1952; Saigon, French Indo China. 10:30 a.m. Witnesses:
many in crowd watching a ceremony. One white-silver disc-shaped
object flew straight and fast for 2 minutes.
May 28, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 1:45-2:40 p.m.
Witnesses: two city fire department employees. Two circular
objects--one shiny silver and the other orange or light brown--
were seen three times performing fast maneuvers.
May 29, 1952; San Antonio, Texas. 7 p.m. Witness: USAF pilot
Maj. D.W. Feuerstein, on ground. One bright tubular object
tilted from horizontal to vertical for 8 minutes, then slowly
returned to horizontal, again tilted vertical, accelerated,
appeared to lengthen and turned red. The entire sighting lasted
14 minutes.
June 1, 1952; Rapid City, South Dakota. 6 p.m. Witnesses:
A/lc Beatty and two civilians. At least five long silver objects
flew in a neat box formation with a leader for 15-20 seconds.
June 1, 1952; Walla , Washington. 1 p.m. Witness:
ex-military pilot Reserve Maj. W.C. Vollendorf. One oval object
with a "definite airfoil" performed a fast climb for 7 seconds.
June l, 1952; Soap Lake, Washington. 3+ p.m. Witness: Ray
Lottman. Three glimmering objects flew straight and level for 10
minutes.
June 2, 1952; Bayview, Washington. 5:02 p.m. Witness: Larry
McWade. One purple object seen for unknown length of time. No
further information in files.
June 2, 1952; Fulda, West Germany. Time unknown. Witness: lst
Lt. John Hendry, photo-navigator on an RB-26C reconnaissance
bomber. One porcelain-white object flew very fast for an unknown
length of time.
June 5, 1952; Lubbock, Texas. 11 p.m. Witnesses: Dan Benson,
Mr. Bacon. A total of eight yellow circular objects, like large
stars, were seen during 45 minutes. The first two were in a
trail formation, the others were seen singly.
June 5, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 6:45 p.m. Witness:
S/Sgt T.H. Shorey. One shiny round object flew 5-6 times as fast
as an F-86 jet fighter for 6 seconds.
June 5, 1952; Offutt AFB, Omaha, Nebraska. 11 p.m. Witnesses:
2nd Lt. W.R. Soper, a Strategic Air Command top secret control
officer and former OSI agent; and two other persons. One bright
red object remained stationary for 4.5 minutes before speeding
away with a short tail.
June 6, 1952; Kimpo AFB, Korea. Case missing from official
files.
June 7, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 11:18 a.m. Witnesses:
crew of B-25 bomber #8840 at 11,500'. One rectangular aluminum
object, about 6'x4', flew 250-300' below the B-25.
June 8, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 10:50 a.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. J.D. Markland. Four shiny objects flew straight and
level in a diamond formation.
June 9, 1952; Minneapolis, Minnesota. Case missing from official
files.
June 12, 1952; Ft. Smith, Arkansas. 7:30 p.m. Witnesses: U.S.
Army Major and Lt. Colonel, using binoculars. One orange ball
with a tail flew with a low angular velocity.
June 12, 1952; Marakesch, Morocco. 11:26 a.m. Witness: T/Sgt.
H.D. Adams, operating an SCR-584 radar set. One unidentified
blip tracked at 650 kts. (750 m.p.h.) at greater than 60,000'
altitude.
June 13, 1952; Middletown, Pennsylvania. 8:45 p.m. Witness:
R.S. Thomas, Olmstead AFB employee and former control tower
operator. One round, orange object travelled south, stopped for
1 second, turned east, stopped 1 second, and went down.
June 15, 1952; Louisville, Kentucky. 11:50 p.m. Witness:
Edward Duke, ex-U.S. Navy radar technician. One large, cigar-
shaped object with a blunt front, lit sides and a red stern,
maneuvered in a leisurely fashion for 15 minutes.
June 16, 1952; Walker AFB, New Mexico. 8:30 p.m. Witness: USAF
maintenance specialist S/Sgt. Sparks. Five or six greyish discs,
in a half-moon formation, flew at 500-600 m.p.h. for l minute.
June 17, 1952; McChord AFB, Washington. Between 7:30 and 10:20
p.m. Witnesses: many and varied. From one to five large
silver-yellow objects flew erratically, stopped and started for
about 15 minutes.
June 17, 1952; Cape Cod, Massachusetts. 1:28 a.m. Witness:
pilot of USAF F-94 jet interceptor. A light like a bright star
crossed the nose of the airplane while being observed for 15
seconds. No further information in the files.
June 18, 1952; Columbus, Wisconsin. 9 a.m. Witness: R.A.
Finger. One crescent-shaped object hovered for several seconds
and then sped away.
June 18, 1952; Walnut Lake, Michigan. 10 p.m. Witnesses:
Marron Hoffman and four relatives, using 4x binoculars. One
orange light was observed zigzagging and then hovering for an
unspecified length of time.
June 19, 1952; Goose Bay, Labrador, Canada. 2:37 a.m. Witness:
2nd Lt. A'Gostino and unidentified radar operator. One red light
turned white while wobbling. Radar tracked a stationary target
during the 1 minute sighting.
June 19, 1952; Yuma, Arizona. 2 p.m. Witness: USAF pilot John
Lane. One round, white object flew straight and level for 10
seconds.
June 20, 1952; Central Korea. 3:03 p.m. Witnesses: four Marine
Corps Captains and pilots of F4U-4B Corsair fighter planes. One
10-20' white or silver oval object made a left-hand orbit at
terrific speed for 60 seconds.
June 21, 1952; Kelly AFB, Texas. 12:30 p.m. Witness: T/Sgt.
Howard Davis, flight engineer of B-29 bomber at 8,000' altitude.
One flat object with a sharply pointed front and rounded rear;
white with a dark blue center and red rim, trailed sparks as it
dove past the B-29 at a distance of 500', in l second.
June 22, 1952; Pyungthek, Korea. 10:45 p.m. Witnesses: Two
Marine Corps Sergeants. One 4 ft. diameter object dove at a
runway shooting red flames, hovered briefly over a hill, turned
180 , flashed twice and was gone.
June 23, 1952; Spokane, Washington. 4:05 p.m. Witness: Airport
weather observer Rex Thompson. One round disc with a metallic
shine flashed, and fluttered like a flipped coin for 5-7 minutes.
June 23, 1952; McChord AFB, Washington. 9 p.m. Witness: 2nd
Lt. K. Thompson. One very large light flew straight and level
for 10 minutes. No further information.
June 23, 1952; Kirksville, Missouri. Case missing from official
files.
June 23, 1952; Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 3:30 a.m. Witness:
secretary Martha Milligan. One bullet-shaped object with
burnt-orange exhaust flew straight and level for 30-60 seconds.
June 23, 1952; Owensboro, Kentucky. 10:00 a.m. Witness:
National Guard Lt. Col. O. L. Depp. Two objects looking like
"giant soap bubbles", reflecting yellow and lavender colors, flew
in trail for 5 seconds.
June 23, 1952; Location unknown, but information came via Japan
Hq. "CV 4359". 6:08 a.m. Witness: USAF pilot of the l8th
Fighter-Bomber Group. One black coin-shaped object, 15-20' in
diameter, made an irregular descent.
June 25, 1952; Chicago, Illinois. 8:30 p.m. Witnesses: Mrs.
Norbury, Mr. Matheis. One bright yellow-white, egg-shaped object
which sometimes had a red tail, made seven circles in 1 1/2
hours.
June 25, 1982; Japan-Korea area. Case missing from official
files.
June 26, 1952; Terre Haute, Indiana. 2:45 a.m. Witness: USAF
2nd Lt. C. W. Povelites. Undescribed object flew at 600 m.p.h.
and then stopped. No further information in files.
June 26, 1952; Pottstown, Pennsylvania. 11:50 p.m. Witness:
assistant manager of airport. Three sightings of flashing
lights: two lights separated by 2 miles, with the leader
flashing steadily and the other irregularly; two similarly
flashing lights, but with l mile separation; finally a single
light. Speed estimated at 150-250 m.p.h.. Total of 1/2 hour.
June 27, 1952; Topeka, Kansas. 6:50 p.m. Witnesses: USAF pilot
2nd Lt. K. P. Kelly and wife. One pulsating red object which
changed shape from a circular to a vertical oval as it pulsed.
Was stationary for about 5 minutes, then went out.
June 28, 1952; Lake Kishkanoug, Wisconsin. 6 p.m. Witness: G.
Metcalfe. One silver-white sphere became an ellipse as it turned
and climbed away very fast. 10 seconds.
June 28, 1952; Nagoya, Japan. 4:10 p.m. Witness: Capt. T. W.
Barger, USAF electronics countermeasures officer. One dark blue
elliptical-shaped object with a pulsing border flew straight and
level at 700-800 m.p.h..
June 29, 1952; O'Hare Airport, Chicago, Illinois. 5:45 p.m.
witnesses: three USAF air policemen. One bright silver, flat
oval object surrounded by a blue haze, hovered, then moved very
fast to the right and to the left, and up and down for 45
minutes.
July 3, 1952; Selfridge AFB, Michigan. 4:15 a.m. Witnesses not
identified. Two big lights, estimated at 20' diameter, flew
straight and level at tremendous speed.
July 3, 1952; Chicago, Illinois. 11:50 p.m. Witness: Mrs. J.
D. Arbuckle. Two bright pastel green discs flew straight and
level very fast for 6 seconds.
July 5, 1952; Norman, Oklahoma. 7:58 p.m. Witness: Oklahoma
State Patrolman Hamilton in State Patrol airplane. Three dark
discs hovered and then flew away, silhouetted against a dark
cloud. 15 seconds.
July 6-12, 1952; Elizabeth, New Jersey. 11:00 p.m. Witness:
Charles Muhr. Four pictures taken of some indistinct light which
was admittedly not seen visually, but which appeared on the
negatives.
July 9, 1952; Colorado Springs, Colorado. 12:45 p.m. Witness:
USAF pilot Maj. C. K. Griffin. One object shaped like an airfoil
less its trailing edge, luminous white, moved slowly and
erratically for 12 minutes.
July 9, 1952; Kutztown, Pennsylvania. 6:30 p.m. Witness:
farmer John Mittl. One aluminum, oval-shaped object changed
direction and attitude, finally tipping on end and departing
after 20 seconds. Case file includes three vague photographs.
July 9, 1952; Rapid City AFB, South Dakota. 3:35 p.m.
Witnesses: S/Sgt. D.P. Foster and three other persons. Three
times, a single white, disc-shaped object sped by, straight and
level, in 5 seconds.
July 12, 1952; Annapolis, Maryland. 3:30 p.m. Witness:
insurance company president William Washburn. Four large,
elliptical-shaped objects were seen to fly very fast, stop, turn
90* and fly away in 7-8 seconds. .
July 12, 1952; Kirksville, Missouri. 9 p.m. Witnesses: many
radar controllers who were military officers. Several big blips
tracked on radar at 1,500 kts. (1,700 m.p.h.). There was no
visual sighting.
July 14, 1952; Norfolk, Virginia. 8:12 p.m. Witnesses: Pan
American Airways First Officer William Nash, Second Officer
William Fortenberry. Eight large, round, glowing red objects
maneuvered below their airliner, in formation.
July 15, 1952; West Palm Beach, Florida. 10:10 p.m. Witnesses:
J. Antoneff and two other persons. One discus-shaped object,
greyish, except when hovering, when it appeared muddy. Hovered
over Palm Beach International Airport, then followed an SA-l6
twin-engined amphibian and flew away after 40-60 seconds.
July 16, 1952; Beverly, Massachusetts. 9:35 a.m. Witness: U.S.
Coast Guard photographer Shell Alpert. Four roughly elliptical
blobs of light in formation photographed through window of photo
lab.
July 17, 1952; White Plains, New York. 3:10 p.m. Witness: Mrs.
Florence Daley. Two round objects, bluish-white with brighter
rims, flew in formation, making a sound like bombers, only
softer. Note: Later, the witness stated she heard many feminine
voices coming from the objects.
July 17, 1952; Lockbourne, Ohio. 11 a.m. Witness: Air National
Guard employees. One light like a big star was seen for 3 hours,
but disappeared when an aircraft approached. Also seen the
night of July 20, 22 and 23.
July 18, 1952; Lockbourne, Ohio. 9:10 p.m. Witnesses: T/Sgt.
Mahone, A/3c Jennings. One amber-colored, elliptical-shaped
object with a small flame at the rear, periodically increased in
brightness. It moved very fast for l 1/2 minutes, giving off a
resonant beat sound.
July 18, 1952; Miami, Florida. 11 a.m. Witnesses: E. R. Raymer
and daughter. One opaque, silvery bubble flew very fast at a
right-angle to the wind direction for 10 seconds.
July 18, 1952; Patrick AFB, Florida. 9:45 p.m. Witnesses:
three USAF officers and four enlisted men. Over an hour period,
a series of hovering and maneuvering red-orange lights were
observed moving in a variety of directions.
July 19, 1952; Williston, North Dakota. 2:55 a.m. Witness: one
experienced civilian pilot. One elliptical-shaped object with a
light fringe, travelled down fast, made a 360* and then a 180*
turn in 5 minutes.
July 19, 1952; Elkins Park, Pennsylvania. 11:35 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF pilot Capt. C.J. powley and wife. Two star-like lights
maneuvered, hovered and sped for 5-7 minutes.
July 20, 1952; Lavalette, New Jersey. 12:20 a.m. Witness:
Seton Hall Univ. chemistry professor Dr. A.B. Spooner. Two large
orange-yellow lights with some dull red coloring flew in trail,
turned and circled for 5-6 minutes.
July 21, 1952; Weisbaden, West Germany. 6:30 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF pilot Capt. E.E. Dougher, WAF Lt. J.J. Stong, situated miles
apart. Four bright yellowish lights were seen by Dougher to
separate, with two climbing and two flying away level in the
opposite direction. Stong watched two reddish lights fly in
opposite directions. Sightings lasted about 10-15 minutes.
July 21, 1952; San Marcos AFB, Texas. 10:40 p.m. Witnesses:
one Lieutenant, two Staff Sergeants, three airmen. One blue
circle with a blue trail was seen to hover and then accelerate to
near-sonic speed (700+ m.p.h.) after 1 minute.
July 21, 1952; Converse, Texas. 4:30 p.m. Witness: wife of
USAF Capt. J. B. Neal. One elongated, fuselage-shaped object
flew straight and level, made a right-angle turn and went out of
sight at more than 300 m.p.h., all in 3-5 seconds.
July 21, 1952; Rockville, Indiana. 8:10 p.m. Witnesses: one
military officer, two enlisted men. One aluminum, delta-shaped
object with a vertical fin, flew straight and level, and then
hovered during a 3 minute sighting.
July 22, 1952; Holyoke, Massachusetts. After midnight. Witness:
Mrs. A. Burgess. One round, yellow, flashing light went
downward. No further information in files.
July 22, 1952; Los Alamos, New Mexico. 10:50 a.m. Witnesses:
control tower operator Don Weins, and two pilots for Carco.
Eight large, round, bright aluminum objects flew straight and
level, then darted around erratically during 25 minutes.
July 22, 1952; Uvalde, Texas. 2:46 p.m. Witness: Don Epperly,
Trans Texas Airlines station manager and weather observer. One
large, round, silver object flew at more than 1,000 m.p.h. for 45
seconds, while gyrating.
July 22, 1952; between Boston and Provincetown, Massachusetts.
10:47 p.m. Witnesses: pilot and radar operator of USAF F-94 jet
interceptor. One round blue light passed F-94, spinning.
July 22, 1952; Trenton, New Jersey. 10:50 p.m. t.o 12:45 a.m.,
July 23. Witnesses: crews of several USAF F-94 jet interceptors
from Dover AFB, Del. Thirteen visual sightings and one radar
tracking of blue-white lights during two hours.
July 23, 1952; Pottstown, Pennsylvania. 8:40 a.m. Witnesses:
the two-man crews of three USAF F-94 jet interceptors. One large
silver object, shaped like a long pear with two or three squares
beneath it, flew at 150-180 kts. (170-210 m.p.h.), while a
smaller object, delta-shaped or swept back, flew around it at
1,000-1,500 kts. (1,150-1,700 m.p.h.). Seen by crews for 1-4
minutes.
July 23, 1952; Altoona, Pennsylvania. 12:50 p.m. Witnesses:
two-man crews of two USAF F-94 jet interceptors at 35-46,000'
altitude. Three cylindrical objects in a vertical stack
formation flew at an altitude of 50-80,000'. Seen for 20
minutes.
July 23, 1952; South Bend, Indiana. 11:35 p.m. Witness: USAF
pilot Capt. H. W. Kloth. Two bright blue-white objects flew
together, then the rear one veered off after about 9 minutes.
July 24, 1952; Carson Sink, Nevada. 3:40 p.m. Witnesses: two
USAF Lt. Colonels McGinn and Barton in a B-25 bomber. Three
silver, delta-shaped objects, each with a ridge along the top,
crossed in front of and above the B-25 at high speed, in 3-4
seconds.
July 26, 1952; Washington, D.C. 8 p.m. until after midnight.
Witnesses: radar operators at several airports, airline pilots.
Many unidentified blips tracked by radar all over Washington
area, at varying speeds. Pilots spotted unidentified lights.
July 26, 1952; Kansas City, Missouri. 12:15 a.m. Witnesses:
USAF Capt. H. A. Stone, men in control towers at Fairfax Field
and Municipal Airport. One greenish light with red-orange
flashes was seen for 1 hour as it descended in the northwest from
40* elevation to 10* elevation.
July 26, 1952; Andrews AFB, Maryland. This was a continuation of
the extensive sightings and radar tracking reports reported
throughout the Washington, D.C. area, all night long.
July 26, 1952; Kirtland AFB, New Mexico. 12:05 a.m. Witness:
Airman lst Class J.M. Donaldson. Eight to ten orange balls in a
triangular or V-formation flew very fast for 3-4 seconds.
July 26, 1952; Williams, California. Case missing from official
files.
July 27, 1952; Selfridge AFB, Michigan. 10:05 a.m. Witnesses:
three B-29 bomber crewmen on ground. Many round, white objects
flew straight and level, very fast. Two at 10:05, one at 10:10,
one at 10:15, one at 10:20. Each was seen for about 30 seconds.
July 27, 1952; Wichita Falls, Texas. 8:30 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. Adrian Ellis. Two disc-shaped objects, illuminated by a
phosphorus light, flew at an estimated l,000 m.p.h. for 15
seconds.
July 28, 1952; Heidelberg, West Germany. 10:20 p.m. Witnesses:
Sgt. B.C. Grassmoen, WAC Pfc. A.P. Turner. One saucer-shaped
object having an appearance of light metal and giving off shafts
of white light, flew slow, made a 90^ turn and climbed away fast
after 4-5 minutes.
July 28, 1952; McGuire AFB, New Jersey. 6 a.m. Witness: Ground
Control Approach radar operator M/Sgt. W.F. Dees, and persons in
the base control tower. Radar tracked a large cluster of very
distinct blips. Visual observation was of oblong objects having
neither wings nor tail, which made a very fast turn and at one
time were in echelon formation. Entire episode lasted 55
minutes.
July 28, 1952; McChord AFB, Washington. 2:15 a.m. Witnesses:
T/Sgt. Walstead, S/Sgt. Calkins of the 635th AC&W Squadron. One
dull, glowing, blue-green ball,.the size of a dime at arms'
length, flew very fast, straight and level.
July 29, 1952; Osceola, Wisconsin. 1:30 a.m. Witnesses: radar
operators on ground, pilot of F-5l Mustang in flight. Several
clusters of up to 10 small radar targets and one large target.
Small targets moved from southwest to east at 50-60 kts. (60-70
m.p.h.), following each other. The large one moved at 600 kts.
(700 m.p.h.). One hour total time. Pilot confirmed one target.
July 29, 1952; Langley AFB, Virginia. 2:30 p.m. Witness: USAF
Capt D.G. Moore, of military air traffic control system. One
undescribed object flew at an estimated 2,600 m.p.h., below
5,000' altitude, toward the air base for about 2 minutes.
July 29, 1952; Langley AFB, Virginia. 2:50 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
Moore, Gilfillan electronics representative W. Yhope. One radar
target tracked moving away, stopped for 2 minutes, again moved
very, very fast. Four minutes.
July 29, 1952; Merced, California. 3:44 or 4:35 p.m. Witnesses:
Herbert Mitchell and one employee. One dark, discus-shaped
object, trailed by a silvery light 2 lengths behind, tipped on
its side, dove, hesitated and then circled very fast during the 2
minute sighting.
July 29, 1952; Wichita, Kansas. 12:35 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
shop employees Douglas and Hess at Municipal Airport. One bright
white circular object with a flat bottom flew very fast, and then
hovered 10-15 seconds over the Cessna Aircraft Co. plant, during
the 5 minute sighting.
July 29, 1952; Ennis, Montana. 12:30 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
persons, alerted that UFOs were coming from the direction of
Seattle, Wash. Two to five flat disc-shaped objects: one
hovered 3-4 minutes, while the others circled it. Sighting
length of 30 minutes not explained further.
July 30, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 11:02 p.m. Witness:
USAF lst Lt. George Funk. One orange light remained stationary
for 10 minutes. No further details in files.
July 30, 1952; San Antonio, Texas. 10 a.m. Witnesses: E.E. Nye
and one other person. One round, white object flew slow and then
sped away after 20-30 minutes.
Aug. 1, 1952; Lancaster, California. 1:14 a.m. Witnesses:
sheriff's deputies and other persons, one named Mallette. Two
brilliant red lights hovered and maneuvered for 5 minutes.
Aug. 2, 1952; Lake Charles, Louisiana. 3 a.m. Witnesses: USAF
lst Lt. W.A. Theil, one enlisted man. One red ball with a blue
flame tail flew straight and level for 3-4 seconds.
Aug. 4, 1952; Phoenix, Arizona. 2:20 a.m. Witness: USAF
A/3c W.F. Vain. One yellow ball which lengthened and narrowed to
plate shape, flew straight and level for 5 minutes.
Aug. 4, 1952; Mt. Vernon, New York. 11:37 a.m. Witnesses: one
woman, two children. One object, shaped like a lifesaver or
donut, emitted black smoke from its top and made a 15' arc in 1.5
minutes. Observed for 2 hours.
Aug 5. 1952; Haneda AFB, Japan. 11:30 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
F-94 jet interceptor pilots lst Lt. W.R. Holder and lst Lt. A.M.
Jones, and Haneda control tower operators. Airborne radar
tracked a target for 90 seconds. Control tower operators watched
50-60 minutes while a dark shape with a light flew as fast as 330
kts. (380 m.p.h.), hovered, flew curves and performed a variety
of maneuvers.
Aug. 6, 1952; Tokyo, Japan. This is a continuation of the Haneda
AFB sightings.
Aug. 6, 1952; Port Austin, Michigan. Case missing from official
files.
Aug. 7. 1952; San Antonio, Texas. 9:08 a.m. Witness: Mrs.
Susan Pfuhl. Four glowing white discs: one made a 180* turn,
one flew straight and level, one veered off, and one circled
during the 70 minute sighting.
Aug. 9, 1952; Lake Charles, Louisiana. 10:50 a.m. Witness:
USAF A/3c J.P. Raley. One disc-shaped object flew very fast and
then hovered for 2 seconds during a 5-6 minute sighting.
Aug. 13, 1952; Tokyo, Japan. 9:45 p.m. Witness: USAF Marine
Corps pilot Maj. D. McGough. One orange light flew a left orbit
at 8,000' and 230 m.p.h., spiralled down to no more than 1,500',
remained stationary for 2-3 minutes and went out. An attempted
interception was unsuccessful.
Aug. 18, 1952; Fairfield, California. 12:50 a.m. Witnesses:
three policemen. One object changed color like a diamond, and
changed directions during the 30 minute sighting.
Aug. 19, 1952; Red Bluff, California. 2:38 p.m. Witness:
Ground Observer Corps observer Albert Lathrop. Two objects,
shaped like fat bullets, flew straight and level, very fast for
25 seconds.
Aug. 20, 1952; Neffesville, Pennsylvania. 3:10 a.m. Witnesses:
Bill Ford and two others. An undescribed object flew at 500'
altitude for several minutes. No further data in files.
Aug. 21, 1952; Dallas, Texas. 11:54 p.m. Witness: Jack Rossen,
ex-artillery observer. Three blue-white lights hovered then
descended; 1.5 minutes later, one of them descended more.
Aug. 23, 1952; Akron, Ohio. 4:10 a.m. Witnesses: USAF 2nd Lt.
H.K. Funseth, a ground radar observer, and two U.S. Navy men.
One pulsing amber light was seen to fly straight and level for 7
minutes.
Aug. 24, 1952; Hermanas, Mexico. 10:15 a.m. Witness: Georgia
Air National Guard F-84G jet fighter pilot Col. G.W. Johnson.
Two 6' silver balls in abreast formation, one turned grey
rapidly, the other slowly. One changed to long grey shape during
a turn. Sighting lasted about 10 minutes.
Aug. 24, 1952; Tucson, Arizona. 5:40 p.m. Witnesses: Mr. and
Mrs. George White. One large round, metallic, white light with a
vague lower surface, flew slowly, then fast With a dancing,
wavering motion, for about 1 minute.
Aug. 24, 1952; Levelland, Texas. 9:30 p.m., 10:30 p.m.
Witnesses: Mr. and Mrs. Elmer Sharp. One object, shaped like a
spinning top, changing color from red to yellow to blue, and with
a fiery tail, hovered for 20 minutes, whistling, then flew away.
It, or another like it, returned an hour later.
Aug. 25, 1952; Pittsburg, Kansas. 5:35 a.m. Witness: radio
station musician William Squyres. One dull aluminum object,
shaped like two meat platters, face to face, estimated at 75'
long, 45' wide, and 15' thick. Through a window in the front
section shone a blue light; the head and shoulders of a man could
be seen. The mid section had numerous windows through which
could be seen some kind of regular movement. A series of small
propellers were spaced close together along the outer edge of the
object, revolving at high speed. The object was hovering about
10' above the ground, 100 yards off the road, with a slight
rocking motion. It then ascended vertically with a sound like a
large covey of quail starting to fly at the same time.
Vegetation showed signs of having been disturbed under the
object.
Aug. 25, 1952; Holloman AFB, New Mexico. 3:40 p.m. Witnesses:
civilian supervisor Fred Lee, foreman L.A. Aquilar. One round
silver object flew south, turned and flew north, made a 360 turn
and flew away vertically after 3-5 minutes.
Aug. 26, 1952; Lathrop Wells, Nevada. 12:10 a.m. Witness: USAF
Capt. D.A. Woods. One large, round, very bright object with a
V-shaped contrail having a dark cone in the center, flew very
fast, hovered, made an instantaneous 90 turn, followed by a
gentle climb and finally sudden acceleration.
Aug. 28, 1952; Chickasaw and Brookley AFB, Alabama. 9:30 p.m.
Witnesses: USAF control tower operators, officer from USAF
Office of Special Investigations, and others. Six objects,
varying from fiery red to sparkling diamond appearance, hovered,
flew erratically up and down for 1 hour and l5minutes.
Aug. 29, 1952; Colorado Springs, Colorado. 8:35 p.m. Witness:
pilot C.A. Magruder. Three objects, 50' in diameter, 10' high,
aluminum with red-yellow exhaust, flew in trail at estimated
1,500 m.p.h. for 4-5 seconds.
Aug. 29, 1952; west of Thule, Greenland (77' N., 75* 15' W.)
10:50 a.m. Witnesses: two U.S. Navy pilots flying a P4Y-2
patrol plane. Three white disc-shaped or spherical objects
hovered, then flew very fast in a triangular formation, in 2-3
minutes.
Sept. l, 1952; Marietta, Georgia. 10:50 p.m. Witness: ex-AAF
B-25 gunner. Two large white disc-shaped objects with green
vapor trails flew in trail formation, merged, flew away very
fast.
Sept. 1, 1952; Marietta, Georgia. 10:30 p.m. Witness: one
unidentified person using binoculars. Two large objects shaped
like spinning tops and displaying red, blue and green colors,
flew side by side, leaving a sparkling trail for 30 minutes.
Sept. 1, 1952; Atlanta, Georgia. 9:43 p.m. Witnesses: Mrs.
William Davis and nine other persons. One light, similar to the
evening star, moved up and down for a long period of time.
Sept. l, 1952; Marietta, Georgia. 10:30 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
Bowman (ex-artillery officer) and 24 others. A red, white, and
blue-green object which spun and shot off sparks for 15 minutes.
Sept. 1, 1952; Yaak, Montana. 4:45 a.m. Witnesses: Visual
sighting by two USAF enlisted men, radar tracking seen by three
men using AN/FPS-3 radar set. Two small, varicolored lights
became black silhouettes at dawn; flew erratically. One hour.
Sept. 2, 1952; Chicago, Illinois. 3 a.m. Witness: radar
tracker Turason (ground controlled approach) at Midway Airport.
40 targets flew in miscellaneous directions, up to 175 m.p.h.
Two seemed to fly in formation with DC-6 airliner. Total of
8 hours.
Sept. 3, 1952; Tucson, Arizona. 99 a.m. Witnesses: civilian
pilots McCraven and Thomas. One shiny, dark ellipse made three
broad, curving sweeps in 1.5 minutes.
Sept. 6, 1952; Lake Charles AFB, Louisiana. l:3O'a.m.
Witnesses: T/Sgt. J.E. Wilson and two enlisted men. One bright
star-like light moved about the sky for 2 hours.
Sept. 6, 1952; Tucson, Arizona. 4:55 p.m. Witnesses: ex-
Congresswoman Mrs. Isabella King and Bill McClain. One orange
teardrop-shaped object whirled on its vertical axis, descended
very fast, stopped, retraced its path upwards, while whirling in
the opposite direction. 1.5 minutes.
Sept. 7, 1952; San Antonio, Texas. 10:30 p.m. Witnesses:
chemist J.W. Gibson and others. One orange object or light (the
color of 2,000' F.) exploded into view. Seen for from 3-20
seconds by various observers.
Sept. 9, 1952; Rabat, French Morocco. 9 p.m. Witness: E.J.
colisimo, a civilian illustrator with USAF Intelligence. One
disc with lights along part of its circumference, flew twice as
fast as a T-33 jet trainer, in a slightly curved path for 5
seconds.
Sept. 12, 1952; Allen, Maryland. 9:30 p.m. Witnesses: Mr. and
Mrs. David Kolb, of the Ground Observer Corps, using binoculars.
One white light with a red trim and streamers flew northeast for
35 minutes.
Sept. 13, 1952; Allentown, Pennsylvania. 7:40 p.m. Witness:
private pilot W.A. Hobler, flying a Beech Bonanza. One object,
shaped like a fat football, flaming orange-red color, descended
and then pulled up in front of the witness' airplane. Seen for 2
seconds.
Sept. 14, 1952; Santa Barbara, California. 8:40 p.m. Witness:
USAF C-54 transport pilot Tarbutton. One blue-white light
travelled straight and level, then went up. Seen for 30 seconds.
Sept. 14, 1952; North Atlantic, between Ireland and Iceland.
Witnesses: military persons from several countries aboard ships
in the NATO "Operation Mainbrace" exercise. Among the sightings:
one blue-green triangle was observed flying 1,500 m.p.h; three
objects in a triangular formation gave off white light exhaust at
1,500 m.p.h.
Sept. 14, 1952; White Lake, South Dakota. 7 p.m. Witness:
Ground Observer Corps observer L.W. Barnes, using binoculars.
One red, cigar-shaped object, with three puffs behind it, flew
west, then south, and then was gone. Seen 30-40 minutes.
Sept. 14, 1952; Ciudad Jaurez, Mexico. 11:30 p.m. to 1:20 a.m.,
Sept. 15. Witnesses: consulting engineer R. J. Portis and three
others. Six groups of 12-15 luminous spheres or discs, which
flew in formations varying from arcs to inverted-Y's, very fast.
Sept. 14, 1952; Olmstead AFB, Pennsylvania. Time not known.
Witness: pilot of Flying Tiger Airlines airplane N67977. One
blue light flew very fast on a collision course with the
airliner. Note: the summary card attached to the file showed
completely different information.
Sept. 16, 1952; Portland, Maine. 6:22 p.m. Witnesses: crew of
U.S. Navy P2V Neptune patrol plane, visually and via radar. A
group of five lights was seen at the same time a long, thin blip
was being tracked on radar. Note: consideration was given to
this being USAF KC-97 airplanes involved in a refueling
operation. The sighting involved 20 minutes.
Sept. 16, 1952; Warner-Robbins AFB, Georgia. 7:30 p.m.
Witnesses: three USAF officers, two civilians. Two white lights
flew abreast, at 100 m.p.h., for 15 minutes.
Sept. 17, 1952; Tucson, Arizona. 11:40 a.m. Witnesses: Mr. and
Mrs. Ted Hollingsworth. Two groups of three large, flat, shiny
objects flew in tight formations: the first group slow, the
second faster. Seen for 2 minutes.
Sept. 23, 1952; Gander Lake, Newfoundland, Canada. No time
shown. Witnesses: Pepperell AFB operations officer and seven
other campers. One bright white light, which reflected on the
lake, flew straight and level at 100 m.p.h. for 10 minutes.
Sept. 24, 1952; Charleston, West Virginia. 3:30 p.m. Witnesses:
crew of USAF B-29 bomber. A lot of bright, metallic particles or
flashes, up to 3' in length, streamed past the B-29 for 15
minutes.
Sept. 26, 1952; 400 miles NNW of Azores Islands. 11:16 p.m.
Witnesses: pilot, copilot, engineer and aircraft commander of
USAF C-124 transport plane. Two distinct green lights were seen
to the right and slightly above the C-124, and at one time seemed
to turn toward it. The lights alternated leading each other
during more than 1 hour of observation.
Sept. 27, 1952; Inyokern, California. 10 p.m. Witnesses: two
couples, using a 5x telescope. One large, round object, which
went through the color spectrum every 2 seconds, was seen to fly
straight and level for 15 minutes.
Sept. 29, 1952; Rochester, England. 3:55 p.m. Witnesses
unknown, but report came via the Rochester Police Dept. Two flat
objects hovered for 3 minutes, and then sped away.
Sept. 29, 1952; Southern Pines, North Carolina. 8:15 p.m.
Witnesses: U.S. Army Res. lst Lt. C.H. Stevens and two others.
One green ellipse with a long tail orbited for 15 minutes.
Sept. 29, 1952; Aurora, Colorado. 3:15 p.m. Witness: USAF
T/Sgt. B.R. Hughes. Five or six circular objects, bright white
but not shiny, circled in trail formation for 5-6 minutes.
Oct. 1, 1952; Shaw AFB, South Carolina. 6:57 p.m. Witness:
USAF lst Lt. T.J. Pointek, pilot of RF-8O reconnaissance jet. One
bright white light flew straight, then vertical, then hovered,
and then made an abrupt turn during a 23 minute attempted
intercept.
Oct. 1, 1952; Pascagoula, Mississippi. 7:40 p.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. C.C. McLean and one other person. One round,
milky-white object, shaped like a powder puff, hovered for 5-10
minutes then flew away very fast in an arc. A loud blast was
heard at the start of the 22 minute sighting.
Oct. 7, 1952; Alamagordo, New Mexico. 8:30 p.m. Witness: USAF
Lt. Bagnell. One pale blue oval, with its long axis vertical,
flew straight and level for 4-5 seconds, covering 30 in that
time.
Oct. 10, 1952; Otis AFB, Massachusetts. 6:30 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF S/Sgt., two other enlisted men. One blinking white light
moved like a pendulum for 20 minutes, and then shot straight up.
Oct. 17, 1952; Taos, New Mexico. 9:15 p.m. Witnesses: Four
USAF officers One round, bright blue light moved from north to
northeast at an elevation of 45* for 2-3 seconds and then burned
out.
Oct. 17, 1952; Killeen, Texas. 10:15 p.m. Witnesses: Ministers
Greenwalt and Kluck. Ten lights, or a rectangle of lights, moved
more or less straight and level for 5 seconds.
Oct. 17, 1952; Tierra Amarilla, New Mexico. 11 p.m. Witness:
one military person (no detail). One white streamer moved at an
estimated 3,000 m.p.h. in an arc for 20 seconds. No further
details in files.
Oct. 19, 1952; San Antonio, Texas. 1:30 p.m. Witness: one
ex-USAF aircrewman Woolsey. Three circular aluminum objects, one
of which was olive-drab colored on the side, flew in a rough
V-formation. One object flipped slowly, another object stopped,
during the 3-4 minute sighting.
Oct. 19. 1952; 500 miles south of Hawaii. 6:58 p.m. Witnesses:
crew of USAF C-50 transport plane. One round yellow light, with
a red glowing edge, estimated at 100' in diameter, flew at
300-400 kts. (350-450 m.p.h.) for 20 seconds.
Oct. 21, 1952; Knoxville, Tennessee. No time given. Witnesses:
persons at airport weather station. Six white lights flew in a
loose formation for 1-2 minutes, and made a shallow dive at a
weather balloon.
Oct. 24, 1952; Elberton, Alabama. 8:26 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
Lt. Rau, Capt. Marcinko, flying a Beech T-ll trainer. One
object, shaped like a plate, with a brilliant front and vague
trail, flew with its concave surface forward for 5 seconds.
Oct. 29, 1952; Erding Air Depot, West Germany. 7:50 a.m.
Witnesses: USAF S/Sgt. Anderson, A/2c Max Handy. One round
object, silhouetted against a cloud, flew straight and level and
smooth at 400 m.p.h. for 20 seconds.
Oct. 31, 1952; Fayetteville, Georgia. 7:40 p.m. Witness: USAF
Lt. James Allen. One orange, blimp-shaped object, 80' long and
20' high, flew at treetop level, crossed over Allen's car (at
which time his radio stopped playing), then climbed out at 45'
and tremendous speed at the end of a 1 minute sighting.
Nov. 3, 1952; Laredo AFB, Texas. 66:29 p.m. Witnesses: two
control tower operators, including Lemaster. One long,
elliptical, white-grey light flew very fast, paused, and then
increased speed during a 3-4 second observation.
Nov. 4, 1952; Vineland, New Jersey. 5:40 p.m. Witness:
housewife Mrs. Sprague. Two groups of 2-3 whirling discs of
light flew toward the southeast over a period of 30 seconds.
Nov. 12, 1952; Los Alamos, New Mexico. 10:23 p.m. Witness:
security inspector. Four red-white-green lights flew slowly over
a prohibited area for 15 minutes.
Nov. 13, 1952; Opheim, Montana. 2:20 a.m. Witness: radar
tracking by USAF 779th AC&W station. An unexplained track was
followed for 1 hour, 28 minutes, at 158,000' altitude (30 miles)
and a speed of 240 m.p.h. Radar was FPS/3 (PPI).
Nov. 13, 1952; Glasgow, Montana. 2:43 a.m. Witness: U.S.
Weather Bureau observer Earl Oksendahl. Five oval-shaped
objects, with lights all around them, flew in a V-formation for
about 20 seconds. Each object seemed to be changing position
vertically by climbing or diving as if to hold formation.
Formation came from the northwest, made a 90* overhead, and flew
away to the southwest.
Nov. 15, 1952; Wichita, Kansas. 7:02 a.m. Witnesses: USAF Maj.
R.L. Wallander, Capt. Belleman, A/3c Phipps. One orange object
(a blue streak?) varied in shape, as it made jerky upward sweeps
with 10-15 second pauses during a 3-5 minute sighting.
Nov. 24, 1952; Annandale, Virginia. 6:30 p.m. Witness: L.L'
Brettner. One round, glowing object flew very fast, made right
angle turns and reversed course during a 1 hour sighting.
Nov. 27, 1952; Albuquerque, New Mexico. 12:10 p.m. Witnesses:
pilot and crew chief of UAAF B-26 bomber. A series of black
smoke bursts (4-3-3-4-3), similar to antiaircraft fire, was seen
over a 20 minute period.C. 12:30 a.m. Witnesses: radar
Nov. 30, 1952; Washington, D.C. l
operators at Washington National Airport. Radar trackings
similar to those of July 26, 1952.
Dec. 8, 1952; Ladd AFB, Alaska. 8:16 p.m. Witnesses: pilot lst
Lt. D. Dickman and radar operator lst Lt. T. Davies in USAF F-94
jet interceptor (s/n 49-2522). One white, oval light which
changed to red at higher altitude, flew straight and level for 2
minutes, then climbed at phenomenal speed on an erratic flight
path. Sighting lasted 10 minutes.
Dec. 9, 1952; Madison, Wisconsin. 5:45 p.m. Witnesses: Capt.
Bridges and lst Lt. Johneon in USAF T-33 jet trainer. Four
bright lights, in diamond formation, flew at 400 m.p.h. and were
passed by the T-33 at 450 m.p.h. during the 10 minute sighting.
Dec. 28, 1952; Marysville, California. Case missing from
official files.
Jan. 1, 1953; Craig, Montana. 8:45 p.m. Witnesses: Warner
Anderson and two women. A silver, saucer-shaped object with a
red glowing bottom, flew low over a river and then climbed fast
in a horizontal attitude. Ten second sighting.
Jan. 8, 1953; Larson AFB, Washington. 7:15 a.m. Witnesses: men
from the 82nd Fighter-Interceptor Squadron, including the
squadron commander; all were on the ground. One green, disc-
shaped or round object flew southwest for 15 minutes, with a
vertically bobbing motion and sideways movements, below clouds.
Jan. 10, 1953; Sonoma, California. 3:45 p.m. or 4 p.m.
Witnesses: retired Col. Robert McNab, and Mr. Hunter of the
Federal Security Agency. One flat object, like a pinhead, made
three 360* right turns in 9 seconds, made abrupt 90* turns to the
right and left, stopped, accelerated to original speed and
finally flew out of sight vertically after 60-75 seconds.
Jan. 17, 1953; near Guatemala City, Guatemala. 3:55 p.m.
Witness: geologist/salesman J.J. Sackett. One brilliant
green-gold object, shaped like the Goodyear blimp with its length
twice its height, flew 400 m.p.h. straight and level, stopped,
then went straight up with one stop. Sighting lasted 22 seconds.
Jan. 28, 1953; Pt. Mugu, California. 1 p.m. Witness: R.W.
Love, owner of Love Diving Co., engaged in retrieving radio-
controlled drones. An 18-20' white, flat disc flew straight and
level, overhead, for 6 minutes.
Jan. 28, 1953; Corona, California. 6:05 p.m. Witness: USAF
T/Sgt. George Beyer. Five 25' green spheres flew in V-formation,
then changed to trail formation at which time the end objects
turned red. Sighting lasted 12 minutes.
Jan. 28, 1953; Albany, Georgia. No time given. Witnesses:
radar maintenance personnel. Radar tracked one stationary target
for 20 minutes. A visual sighting about the same time was
explained. No further information in the files.
Feb. 3, 1953; Keflavik, Iceland. 5:25 p.m. Witnesses: radar
operators. Four unidentified targets were tracked for 24
minutes. No further data.
Feb. 4, 1953; Yuma, Arizona. 1:50 p.m. Witness: U.S. Weather
Bureau observer Stanley Brown, using a theodolite. One white,
oblong object was tracked flying straight up, leveling off and
being joined by a second, similar, object. The second twice flew
away and returned to the first. After 5 minutes, both were lost
to sight behind clouds.
Feb. 17, 1953; Port Austin. Michigan. 10:04 p.m. Witnesses:
two officers and three airmen of USAF AC&W squadron, visually and
by radar. Visual object appeared to larger and brighter than a
star and changed color; it was seen to move slowly for 5 minutes
until 10:09 p.m. Radar picked up a target at 10:08 p.m. moving
in a similar direction for 17 minutes, at similar speed.
Feb. 20, 1953; Pittsburg-Stockton, California. #1 time unknown;
#2, 10:30 p.m. Witnesses: USAF B-25 bomber pilots. #1 was a
bright yellow light seen for 8 minutes. #2 was a bright light
which flew on a collision course, dimmed and climbed away fast.
Feb. 24, 1953; Sherman, Texas. 7:43 p.m. Witnesses: Warrant
Officer and Mrs. Alden. Two bright red, round objects with big
halos flew in small circles, climbed and faded during a 3-7
second sighting.
Feb. 27, 1953; Shreveport, Louisiana. 11:58 a.m. Witness: USAF
airman/private pilot. Five yellow discs made circular turns,
fluttered, three of them vanished, the other two flew erratic
square turns for a total of 4 minutes.
March 11, 1953; Hackettstown, New Jersey. 4 a.m. Witness: Mrs.
Nina Cook, an experienced private pilot and wife of a Pan Am
flight engineer. A large light, blinking at 10-15 times per
minute, moved up and down along a mountain range.
March 14, 1953; north of Hiroshima, Japan. 11:45 p.m.
Witnesses: radar and visual observation by 10 crew members of
U.S. Navy P2V-5 patrol plane. Groups of 5-10 colored lights,
totalling 90-100, slowly moved aft off the left side of the
airplane, as detected visually and by airborne radar for 5
minutes.
March 21, 1953; Elmira, New York. 3:05 p.m. Witness: Ground
Observer Corps observation post. Six discs in a group flew high
and fast for a few seconds.
March 25, 1953; San Antonio, Texas. 3:05 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
Capt. and Mrs. D.E. Cox. Several lights, some of which moved
straight, others which made 360^ turns for 1.5 hours.
March 27, 1953; Mt. Taylor, New Mexico. 7:25 p.m. Witness:
pilot of USAF F-86 jet fighter at 600 kts. (700 m.p.h.). One
bright orange circle flew at 800 kts. (900 m.p.h.), and executed
three fast rolls. Pilot chased object for 4 minutes.
March 29, 1953; Spooner, Wisconsin. 3:45 p.m. Witness: L.C.
Gillette. One aluminum, circular object flew high and fast,
twice reversing its course. Note: Mr. Gillette saw a similar
object in 1938. Fifteen second sighting.
April 8, 1953; Fukuoka, Japan. 7:55 p.m. Witness: lst Lt. D.J.
Pichon, pilot of USAF F-94B jet interceptor. One bright blue
light descended, accelerated, flew parallel to the F-94,
increased its speed and blinked out after 45 seconds.
April 15, 1953; Tucson, Arizona. 5:45 p.m. Witness: S/Sgt.
V.A. Locey. Three orange lights were seen for: 3 minutes, 30
seconds, and a few seconds.
May 1, 1953; Goose AFB, Labrador, Canada. 11:35 p.m. Witnesses:
pilot and radar operator of USAF F-94 jet interceptor, and
control tower operator. One white light evaded interception
attempt by F-94 during 30 minute sighting.
May 27, 1953; San Antonio, Texas. 8:30 p.m. Witnesses: many
unidentified civilians, including Jacobson. Nine separate
meandering lights were seen during 15 minute sighting.
June 21, 1953; Naha, Okinawa. 7 p.m. Witnesses: Nine Japanese
and Okinawan weather observers. One unidentified light moved
slowly for 20 minutes. No further data in files.
June 22, 1953; Goose AFB, Labrador, Canada. Z:lO a.m.
Witnesses: pilot and radar operator of USAF F-94 jet
interceptor. One red light, flying at an estimated 1,000 kts.
(1,100 m.p.h.) eluded the chasing F-94 after 5 minutes.
June 24, 1953; Iwo Jima, Bonin Islands. 11:30 p.m. Witnesses:
crew of USAF KB-29 aerial tanker plane. Radar tracked an
unidentified target which twice approached to within .5 miles of
the airplane, and once to within 6 miles, during a 2 minute
observation.
June 24, 1953; Simiutak, Greenland. 11:30 a.m. Witness:
weather observer A/2c R.A. Hill. One red triangle hovered and
rotated for 15 seconds, then climbed for 5 minutes.
Aug. 3, 1953; Amarillo, Texas. 12:04 p.m. Witness: Airport
control tower chief C.S. Brown. One round and reflective or
translucent object flew straight, stopped for 7 seconds, sped
along, stopped again, was joined by a similar object and they
flew off in different directions, after a total of 56 minutes.
Aug. 20, 1953; near Castle AFB, California. 9:05 p.m.
Witnesses: crew of TB-29 bomber/trainer plane. One greyish oval
object made four passes at the airplane (three times at 10-20
miles distance), then dived vertically as if two objects.
Aug. 27, 1953; Greenville, Mississippi. 9:45 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF pilot, M/Sgt., others, all on the ground. One meandering
light was observed for 50 minutes. No further details in file.
Sept. 2, 1953; Sidi Slimane AFB, French Morocco. 9:14 p.m.
Witnesses: Lt. Col. William Moore and lst Lt. J.H. McInnis,
Dec. 24, 1953; El Cajon, California. 8:04 a.m. Witnesses: U.S.
Navy Lts. J.B. Howard and L.D. Linhard, flying F9F-2 jet
fighters. Ten silver, oval objects flew at more than 400 kts.
(450 m.p.h.), straight and level, for 5 minutes.
Dec. 28, 1953; Marysville, California. 11:55 a.m. Witness:
Yuba County Airport Manager Dick Brandt. One saucer, with a
brilliant blue light, reflecting on a nearby building, hovered
briefly during the 1.5 minute observation.
Jan. 28, 1954; Rangeley, Maine. 110-10:15 a.m. Witness: Wilhelm
Reich. Two bright lights moved into valley, and were seen
against the mountain background, for 15 minutes.
Feb. 26, 1954; Newburyport, Massachusetts. 2:30 p.m. Witnesses:
architect R.M. Pierce, marine engineer George Avery and one other
person. One silver disc, with a white trail, made a loud roar
for 30-60 seconds.
March 2, 1954; vicinity of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 10 p.m.
Witness: research engineer R.C. Swengel. Three objects, each
with two lights, flew straight and level at medium speed for an
unknown length of time.
March 5, 1954; Nouasseur, French Morocco. 8 p.m. Witnesses:
crews of USAF KC-97 aerial tanker planes. One object or light
made passes at KC-97s, the other flew straight and level.
Sighting duration unknown.
March 12, 1954; Nouasseur, French Morocco. 9:35 a.m. Witness:
USAF lst Lt. Robert Johnson, flying an F-86 jet fighter. He
chased an object at more than 530 m.p.h. for 30 seconds, but was
unable to catch it. It appeared to be the size of a fighter
plane but had neither tanks nor trails.
April 8, 1954; Chicago, Illinois. 4:30 p.m. Witness: Lelah
Stoker. One white round-topped disc, with a humanoid suspended
beneath it, skimmed over the water, landed, and an occupant in a
green suit walked around. It then took off very, very fast.
Sighting lasted 30 minutes.
April 23, 1954; Pittsfield, Maine. 9:30 a.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. F.E. Robinson. One silver dollar-shaped object with a
dome and a flashing light made a sound like a swarm of bees. It
hovered and tilted, flew horizontally, then rose vertically
without tilting. Stones underneath it moved. Four minute
sighting.
April 24, 1954; Hartland, Maine. 6:10 p.m. Witness: D.
Robinson. One large, silver, oblong object with a dome and a
flashing light flew straight and level and then straight up.
Total of 15 minutes under observation.
April 26, 1954; Athens, Georgia. 7:35 p.m. Witnesses: C.
Cartey, Mr. and Mrs. H. Hopkins and their daughter. Fifteen to
twenty yellow objects in a V-formation, flew from south to north
for 10 seconds.
May 10, 1954; Elsinore, California. 12:40 p.m. Witness: U.S.
Marine Corps Squadron Leader D.R. Higgin, flying an F3D-2 jet
fighter. One dark gunmetal delta-shaped object, 22' long and 10'
wide, with a fin on the top, descended at a 25-30' angle under
the lead airplane of a formation, and over the airplane of
Higgin. Sighting lasted a few seconds.
May 11, 1954; Washington, D.C. 10:45 p.m. Witnesses: three
USAF.air policemen at Washington National Airport. Two bright
lights were seen on three occasions to fly straight and level,
make 90* turns and fade. Each sighting lasted about 45 seconds.
May 22, 1954; LaPorte, Indiana. 9:15 p.m. Witnesses: highway
engineer R.W. Dring, engineer Geert Tibma. One bright light made
a shallow climb for 45 seconds.
May 31, 1954; Concord, New Hampshire. 10:15 a.m. Witness: Mrs.
L.K. Stevens. One very white, elongated object flew very, very
fast, and then blinked out after 8-10 seconds.
June 1, 1954; from 400 miles south to Minneapolis, Minnesota.
9 p.m. Witnesses: crew of USAF B-47 jet bomber at 34,000'
altitude. One object with running lights flew at 24-44,000'
altitude for 1 hour.
June 8, 1954; Texarkana, Texas. 1 a.m. or 2:30 a.m. (file not
clear). Witness: L.T. Prewitt, employee of Red River Arsenal.
One golden yellow light flew over his house, making a "shhh" or
buzzing sound for 2 minutes. 9:09 p.m. Witness: USAF pilot
June 10, 1954; Estacado, Texas. 9:09 p.m. Witness: USAF pilot
Capt. Bill McDonald, in flight. One white light descended at
45^ from great altitude, passed under his aircraft, made two
360' turns and went out after 30 seconds.
June 22, 1954; Miami Beach, Florida. 9 p.m. Witnesses: U.S.
Marine Corps Maj. E. Buchser and Maj. J.V. Wilkins. One meteor-
like object descended, stopped, and became extremely bright.
Sighting lasted 7 minutes.
June 24, 1954; Danvers, Massachusetts. 12:45 p.m. Witness:
R.B. Tomer, director of commercial engineering for CBS-Hytron.
One white, elliptical-shaped object covered 45^ of sky in 30
seconds.
June 25, 1954; Indian Lake, Ohio. 5:05 p.m. Witnesses:
experienced private pilot John Mark, flying Navion lightplane;
radar at Dayton, Ohio airport, tracked very fast target at same
location. One silver or aluminum round object with a flat
bottom, raised front edge, inverted cone on top, and a diameter
of about 60'. Flew horizontally, hovered, made a high-G pull up
and then a steep climb into an overcast. Sighting lasted 3-5
minutes.
July 18, ; Normandy, Missouri. 8:40 p.m. Witness: A.T.
Chamblin. One greenish-white disc was seen for 30 minutes.
July 25, 1954; Middle Sister Island, on U.S.-Canadian border in
western Lake Erie. 7:12 p.m. Witness: attorney L.B. Tussing.
One black cylinder, 12 times long as wide, moved fast along the
surface of the lake.
July 30, 1954; Los Angeles, California. 10:15 a.m. Witness:
Hughes Aircraft test pilots Englert and Peterson, flying a B-25
bomber. One metallic, pencil-shaped object flew slowly or
hovered for an unstated length of time.
Aug. 2, 1954; Westlake, Ohio. 5:17 p.m. Witness: ex-AAF B-17
gunner (19 missions) N.E. Schroeder. One thin, bright ellipse,
like polished metal, hovered for 5-8 seconds, dropped down 3,000'
in 3 seconds, hovered again and faded out after a total of 20
seconds in view.
Aug' 6, 1954; San Antonio, Texas. 6 p.m. Witness: mechanical
engineer L.H. Hormer. One intensely white elliptical light
changed to yellow, then orange, then pink, four or five times
while flying straight and level for 5 minutes.
Aug. 11, 1954; Yoron Jima, near Okinawa. 8:55 p.m. Witness:
P.L. Percharde, electrical engineer and assistant manager of
Moeller Shipwrecker Co., of Okinawa. A line of blue lights,
underneath. a blue circle with a black center. Flew over ship
and climbed, illuminating and agitating the clouds.
Aug. 15, 1954; San Marcos, Texas. 10:20 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
Maj. W.J. Davis, Capt. R.D. Sauers, flying a C-47 transport
plane. One dark blue oblong object paced the C-47, veered away,
then crossed in front of it. Five minute sighting.
Aug. 24, 1954; Egilstadir, Iceland. 8:30 p.m. Witness: one
unnamed farmer. A cylinder, 2-2.5' long, 4-5' in diameter, made
a loud whizzing sound, flew straight and level fast, then slow,
then fell into sandbar.
Aug. 26, 1954; Danville, Virginia. 6:15 a.m. Witness: Rev.
W.L. Shelton. Two domed ellipses, 20' long, 8' thick, 10' at
ends; glowing silver or orange. Hovered, then climbed side-by-
side while getting brighter. Observed for 2 minutes.
Aug. 27, 1954; Dorchester, Massachusetts. 1 p.m. Witness: E.A.
Srazdes. Seven large, white, teardrop-shaped objects turned
blue. Flew in line formation and increased speed during the 2
minute sighting.
Aug. 29, 1954; Prince Christian, Greenland. 11:05 a.m.
Witnesses: lst Officer H.G. Gardner, engineer J.V.D. Whitisy,
flying Royal Dutch Airlines DC-4 (PH-DBZ). Three or four dark,
lens-shaped objects veered north and changed position in
formation during the 10 minute sighting.
Sept. 4, 1954; Butler, Missouri. 3 a.m. Witness: J.
Faltemeier, CAA communications specialist. Twenty-thirty lights,
as if on a string, flew straight and level for 1.5 minutes.
Sept. 5, 1954; Butler, Missouri. 12:23 a.m. Witness: J.
Faltemeier, CAA communications specialist. One silver or white
object with a slightly swept-back leading edge and a following
exhaust, flew straight and level, then veered southwest to south
after 30 seconds.
Sept. 18, 1954; Kimpo Air Base, Japan. 5:55 a.m. Witnesses:
two control tower operators, a weather forecaster and a weather
observer. One round object, like polished aluminum, flew
straight and level for 11-13 minutes.
Sept. 21, 1954; Barstow, California. 1 a.m. Witnesses: two
local policemen, four U.S. Marine Corps police, one highway
patrolman. One red-orange ball giving off sparks, and a smaller
light, made a zigzag descent and then hovered. Total of 20
minutes.
Sept. 21, 1954; Santa Maria, Azores Islands. 9:45 p.m. Witness:
airport guard. One 10'x5' light metallic blue, pecan-shaped
object with a clear glass or plastic nose having a door, and with
poles or aerials on the nose. Humming or whining, it hovered,
landed vertically, 50' away. A blond man, 5' 10" tall appeared,
spoke in a strange language, patted the guard on the shoulder,
got in the object, hooked up his harness, pushed a button, took
off with the object's nose pointed up, then levelled off and
climbed vertically. Sighting lasted 2-3 minutes.
Sept. 22, 1954; Marshfield, Missouri. 9 a.m. Witnesses:
private pilot J.N. Williams, E.J. Ash. A thin, translucent tan
asymmetrical boomerang-shaped object revolved, then tumbled down
behind some trees. Marks were found in the dirt. Sighting
lasted 15 minutes.
Sept. 23, 1954; Gatlinburg, Tennessee. 9:45 a.m. Witness: Dave
Owenby. Two bright silver, wheel-shaped objects flew from north
to south in trail for 2 minutes.
Oct. 13, 1954; Nouasseur, French Morocco. 10:05 a.m. Witness:
weather observer, following a balloon with his theodolite. One
round, flat, silver object flew straight and level for 30
seconds.
Oct. 15, 16 and 17, 1954; Kingfisher, Oklahoma. 8:45 p.m. Fifty
objects with illuminated bottoms were seen flying in a
V-formation, very fast, on successive nights. Only data is on
summary card.
Oct. 28, 1954; Miho Air Base, Japan. 5:32 p.m. Witnesses: USAF
pilots Lt. Col. O.C. Cook and Lt. J.W. Brown, on ground using
7x50 binoculars. One brilliant white, round-oval object climbed
in front of clouds, brightened, turned 90 to the north. Seen
for 45 seconds.
Oct. 29, 1954; Terciera Islands, Azores. 9 p.m. Witnesses:
four Portuguese nationals. One object, shaped like a stovepipe
with a center bulge and short wings (10' long, 3' in diameter, 3'
wings) having concave wingtips, and grey colored. Made a
gargling sound when hovering, then disappeared in the glare of
airplane landing lights. Sighting lasted 4-5 minutes.
Nov. 15, 1954; Augusta, Maine. 44 p.m. Witness: N. Gallant,
manager of radio station WFAV. Ten gold, circular objects flew
in vertical V-formation, straight and level for 3 minutes.
Nov. 19, 1954; Corvallis, Oregon. 4:15 p.m. Witness: P.J.
Gunn, assistant professor of art at Oregon State University and
ex-U.S. Navy aviation cadet. One bright white light hovered
8.5-9 minutes, then crossed 20 of sky in 3-3.5 minutes.
Nov. 28, 1954; Manilla, Phillipine Islands. 10:50 a.m. Witness:
one anonymous medical doctor. One flat-bottomed, domed object
(65-70' across, 18-20' high), bright orange with yellow discs
attached and an exhaust trail. Flew north, stopped, reversed its
course during 4 minute sighting.
Dec. 3, 1954; Gulfport, Mississippi 12:12 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. S.P. Mellen. One translucent grey, round, flat object
rotated on its vertical axis at high r.p.m. for 30 seconds.
Dec. 7, 1954; Cape Province, South Africa. 1:15 p.m. Witness:
weather officer, using a theodolite. One white, semi-circular,
flat object with a dome flew from west to east, then turned
north. Sighting lasted 7 minutes.
Jan, 1, 1955; Cochise, New Mexico. 6:44 a.m. Witnesses:
instructor and student pilot in USAF B-25 bomber/trainer. A
metallic disc, shaped like two pie pans face-to-face, and 120-
130' in diameter, paced the B-25, showing both its edge and its
face, for 5-7 minutes. Only item in case file was summary form.
Jan. 26, 1955; Lakeland, Florida. 6:15 p.m. Witness: J.M.
Holland. A black smoke trail made a circle. There was an
explosion and some objects fell. No further information in file.
Feb.l, 1955; 20 miles east of Cochise, New Mexico. 7:55 p.m.
Witnesses: Instructor Capt. D.F. Ritzdorf, aviation cadet F.W.
Miller in TB-25 bomber/trainer. One red and white ball hovered
off the left wing of the TB-25 for 5 minutes, then made a very
fast climb. Total time of sighting was 8 minutes.
Feb. 2, 1955; Miramar Naval Air Station, California. 11:50 a.m.
Witness: USN Cmdr. J.L. Ingersoll. One highly polished sphere,
with reddish-brown coloring, fell, then instantly accelerated to
1,000-1,500 m.p.h.
Feb. 10, 1955; Bethesda, Maryland. 10:03 p.m. Witness: E.J.
Stein, model maker at U.S. Navy ship design facility. One
object, shaped like a small portion of the bottom of the Moon,
with a radiant yellow color, hovered for 30 seconds. Its bottom
changed to a funnel shape. Total sighting lasted 1.5-2 minutes.
April 30, 1955; Travis County, Texas. 7:30 a.m. Witness USAF
Wing Intelligence Officer Maj. L..J. Pagozalski. Four black
objects in a cluster made a whooshing sound like a zephyr.
Sighting lasted 2-3 seconds.
May 4, 1955; Keflavik, Iceland. 12:38 p.m. Witnesses: Lt. Col.
E.J. Stealy, lst Lt. J.W. Burt. About 10 round, white objects,
one of which left a brief smoke trail, flew in an irregular
formation, some of them making erratic movements during the 5-8
second sighting.
May 23, 1955; Cheyenne, Wyoming. Midnight. Witnesses: USAF
Airman/Basic I.J. Shapiro and E.C. Ingber. During a 5 minute
period, two slender, vertical rectangles were seen low on the
horizon, and two ovals with tops (dark, with dark blue
illumination) flew higher.
July 29, 1955; Columbus, Nebraska. 10:45 p.m. Witness: Morrice
Raymond. Four orange flashing lights and one whIte flashing
light moved up and down like yo-yos for 5-6 minutes.
Aug. 11, 1955; Iceland. 11:45 a.m. Witness: 2nd Lt. E.J.
Marlow. Twelve grey objects, from cigar to egg-shaped, varied
their formation from elliptical to wavy line to scattered to
straight line to trail formation. Speed varied from hover to
1,000 m.p.h. Sighting lasted 3-4 minutes.
Aug. 23, 1955; Arlington, Virginia. 10:45 a.m. Witness: G.M.
Park, using a 400x telescope. Several orange lights moved singly
or in groups, circling and stopping during 30 minute sighting.
Sept. 3, 1955; Bellingham, Washington. Witness: observer
Saunders for Ground Observer Corps. One white pinhead moved
slowly across 30^ of sky in 15 minutes. No further information.
Sept. 7, 1955; Washington, D.C. Witnesses: two photographers,
one plate maker for the Army Map Service (one named Smith). One
glowing round object flew an arc for 1 minute.
Sept. 9, 1955; near Alcoa, Tennessee. 12 noon. Witness: M.N.
Dawkins, using binoculars. One brown, almost square object flew
with a circular motion for 10-15 minutes.
Oct. 8, 1955; Loogootee, Indiana. 4:38 p.m. Witnesses: R.D.
Prather, H. Ahern. One round, silver or white object flew
straight and level at more than 1,000 m.p.h. for an unstated
length of time.
Oct. 11, 1955; Pt. Lookout, Maryland. 4 p.m. Witnesses: B.
Hale, A. Ostrom. One round object which looked white in the
daylight and turned red with sparks toward the end of the 2.5
hour sighting, made a deep roar, unlike an aircraft.
Nov. 17, 1955; St. Louis, Missouri. 6:10 a.m. Witness: J.A.
Mapes. Twelve round, flat objects, silver on top and dark on the
bottom, flew in 4-deep formation, tipping in pitch and roll, for
45 seconds.
Nov. 20, 1955; Lake City, Tennessee. 5:20 p.m. Witnesses:
Operations Officer Capt. B.G. Denkler and five men of the USAF
663rd AC&W Sqdn. Two oblong, bright orange, semi-transparent
objects flew at terrific speed and erratically, toward and away
from each other. Observed by various persons form 4 to 15
minutes.
Nov. 25, 1955; La Veta, Colorado. 10:30 a.m. Witness: State
Senator S.T. Taylor. One dirigible-shaped object (fat front,
tapered toward the tail) object, which was luminous green-blue
and jellylike, appeared overhead diving at a 45' angle,
then reduced angle to 30'. Object seen for 5 seconds.
Dec. 21, 1955; Caribou, Maine. 111 p.m. Witness: Roberta V.
Jacobs. One round, very bright gold, domed disc made a short
climb, rotated, hovered and then accelerated during the 6-8
minute sighting.
Feb. 12, 1956; Goose Bay, Labrador, Canada. 11:25 p.m.
Witnesses: F-89 pilot Bowen, radar observer Crawford. One green
and red object rapidly circled the aircraft while being tracked
on radar during 1 minute sighting. No further details.
Feb, 19, 1956; Houston, Texas. 6:07 a.m. Witnesses: crew of
Eastern Airlines Super Constellation. One intense white light,
moving 4-5 times the speed of the airplane, was evaded by the
pilot.
April 4, 1956; McKinney, Texas. 3:15 p.m. Witnesses: Capt. Roy
Hall, U.S. Army, ret.; Charles Anderson and others; some observed
through a 6" telescope, others through a 55-200x telescope. One
fat, oblong object with two lines around its middle, remained
stationary for 6 hours.
June 6, 1956; Banning, California. 5:30 a.m. Witness: Mr.
Bierman. One thin disc with a small dome, shimmering silver,
hovered about 100 yards away for 8-10 seconds, then zoomed up.
Aug. 8, 1956; 20 miles south of Quartsite, Arizona. ll p.m.
Witnesses: attorneys W.B. Buttermore and J.W. Smith. One
blue-white pulsating light flew fast, straight and level, for 5-7
minutes.
Aug. 27, 1956; Juniata, Pennsylvania. 9:55 p.m. Witness: Mrs.
R.S. Pope. One bright disc with a clear dome flew vertically,
then north. A very cold breeze seemed to have been originated by
the object during the 3 minute sighting.
Sept. 4, 1956; Dallas, Texas. 9 p.m. Witnesses: U.S. Marine
Corps T/Sgt. R.D. Rogers and family. One large star, changing to
red color, remained stationary for 20 minutes, then went west at
200 kts. (230 m.p.h.). Sighting lasted 23 minutes.
Sept. 14, 1956; Highland, North Carolina. 1 a.m. Witness:
Scaly, N. Car. policeman O.S. Gryman. Fourteen yellow-to-red
round objects with tremendous exhaust, flew in a Vague formation
from southwest to east to northeast and back again, while
swoooping up and down. Sighting lasted 1.5 hours.
Nov. 1, 1956; 60 miles east of St. Louis, Missouri, in Illinois.
5:30 p.m. Witness: USAF Capt. W..M. Lyons, Intelligence Division
Chief (Aerial Weather Reconnaissance Officer), flying a T-33 jet
trainer. One orange light with a blue tinge, flew across the sky
for 2 minutes.
Nov. 30, 1956; Charleston AFB, South Carolina. 12:48 p.m.
Witness: USAF aerial navigator Maj. D.D. Grimes. One
unspecified object flew at an estimated 100' altitude over water
for 10 minutes. No further details.
Dec. 31, 1956; Guam. 2:10 a.m. Witness: USAF lst Lt. Ted
Brunson, flying an F-86D jet interceptor. One round, white
object flew under the F-86D, which was unable to turn as sharply
as the object.
April 25, 1957; Ringgold, Louisiana. Military witness
Robertson. Case missing from official files.
June 12, ; Milan, Italy. 7:30 p.m. Witness: G.U. Donadio,
translator for export-import firm. One object "big as a hen's
egg" flew very fast, zigzagged, hovered and revolved, then shot
up after 17 minutes.
July 27 or 29, 1957; Longmont, Colorado. Early morning.
Witness: J.L. Siverly. One thick disc, ice blue, with a top
like honeycomb (interconnected hexagons), hovered and rocked
below the hill tops for 10 minutes. Middle band was scalloped,
bottom had four kidney-shaped forms.
July 29, 1957; Cleveland, Ohio. 10:31 p.m. Witnesses: Capital
Airlines Capt. R.L. Stimley, First Officer F.J. Downing. One
large, round, yellow-white object dimmed once, crossed the bow of
the airliner, which then gave chase but was unable to catch it.
Sighting last 8 minutes.
July 29, 1957; Oldsmar, Florida. 11:45 a.m. Witness: E.E.
Henkins. One pale yellow fireball glided into the water and
exploded. Viewed for 1 minute.
Sept. 20, 1957; Kadena AFB, Okinawa. 8 p.m. Witnesses: S/Sgt.
H.T. O'Connor, S/Sgt. H.D. Bridgeman. One object, shaped like a
coke bottle without the neck, translucent and fluorescent. Made
four 5-10 second passes from north to south, with 4-5 minutes
between passes.
Oct. 8, 1957; Seattle, Washington. 9:17 a.m. Witnesses: two
U.S. Army sergeants. Two flat, round, white objects flew in
trail formation along an irregular path, frequently banking
during 25-30 seconds.
Nov. 6, 1957; Radium Springs, New Mexico. 10:50 p.m. Witnesses:
one Las Cruces policeman, one Dona Ana County Deputy Sheriff.
One round object--changing from red to green to blue to white--
rose vertically from a mountain top. Sighting lasted 10 minutes.
Nov. 8, 1957; Merrick, Long Island, New York. l0:10 a.m
Witness: Mrs. L. Dinner. One bar-shaped object, 3.5' long,
giving off blue flashes, made a swishing sound. No further data.
Nov. 26, 1957; Robins AFB, Georgia. 10:07 a.m. Witnesses:
three control tower operators, one weather observer and four
others. One silver, cigar-shaped object suddenly vanished after
8 minutes.
Nov. 30, 1957; New Orleans, Louisiana. 2:11 p.m. Witnesses:
three U.S. Coast Guardsmen. One round object turned white, then
gold, then separated into three parts and turned red. Sighting
lasted 20 minutes.
Dec. 13, 1957; Col Anahuac, Mexico. 9:35 a.m. Witness: R.C.
Cano. Fourteen-fifteen circular, tapered discs, very bright,
flew in a formation like a stack of coins, then changed to an
inverted-V formation. Sighting lasted 20 minutes.
Dec. 17, 1957; near Grand Junction, Colorado. 7:20 p.m.
Witness: F.G. Hickman, 17. One round object changed from yellow
to white to green to red; red tail was twice as long as the body.
It stopped, started, backed up for 45 minutes.
March 14, 1958; Healdsburg, California. 8:45 a.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. W.F. Cummings and one other. A 3' round, black
object touched the ground and then took off. Watched for 2
minutes.
April 14, 1958; Lynchburg, Virginia. 1 p.m. Witness: USAF Maj.
D.G. Tilley, flying C-47 transport. One grey-black rectangular
object rotated very slowly on its horizontal axis for 4 seconds.
May 9, 1958; Bohol Island, Phillipine Islands. 11:05 a.m.
Witness: Phillipine Airlines pilot. One object with a shiny,
metallic surface was falling and spinning for 1.5 minutes.
June 14, 1958; Pueblo, Colorado. 10:46 a.m. Witness: airport
weather observer O.R. Foster, using a theodolite. An object
shaped like Saturn, less the bottom part; silver with no metallic
luster, flew overhead for 5 minutes.
June 20 ,1958; Ft. Bragg, North Carolina. 11:05 p.m. Witness:
Battalion Communication Chief SFC A. Parsley. One silver,
circular object, its lower portion seen through a green haze,
hovered, then oscillated slightly, then moved at great speed.
Watched for 10 minutes.
Aug. 17, 1958; Warren, Michigan. 7:05 p.m. Witness: A.D.
Chisholm. One extremely bright object shaped first like a bell,
then like a saucer, hovered for 5 minutes, flipped over and sped
away to the west-south-west. Sighting lasted 6-10 minutes.
Sept. 1, 1958; Wheelus AFB, Libya. 12:15 a.m. Witness: Philco
technical representative A.M. Slaton. One round, blue-white
object flew at varying speeds. First sighting lasted 2 minutes,
second lasted 1.5 minutes.
Oct. 2, 1958; Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. 2:30 p.m. Witness:
naturalist Ivan Sanderson. One dull-grey object, shaped like a
pickle with a flat bottom, flew erratically and made loops for 15
seconds.
Oct. 27, 1958; Lock Raven Dam, Maryland. 10:30 p.m. Witnesses:
Phillip Small, Alvin Cohen. One large, flat egg-shaped object
affected a car's electrical system and caused a burning sensation
on one of its occupants. Sighting lasted 1 minute.
Nov. 3, 1958; Minot, North Dakota. 2:01 p.m. Witness: M/Sgt.
William R. Butler, medic. One bright green object, shaped like a
10 cent piece, and one smaller, silver round object. First
object exploded, then second object moved toward the location of
the first at high speed. Sighting lasted 1 minute.
March 26 or 27, 1959; Corsica, Pennsylvania. 12:45 p.m.
Witness: T.E. Clark. One dark red, barrel-shaped object, 20'
long, 6-7' high, descended below some trees during the 3 minute
sighting.
June 18, 1959; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 9:30 p.m. Witnesses:
A. Cavelli and R. Blessin, using 7x binoculars. One brown,
cigar-shaped object came from below the horizon (close to the
witnesses) ascending to 40-50^ above the horizon in 4 minutes.
June 30, 1959; Patuxent River NAS, Maryland. 8:23 p.m. Witness:
USN Cdr. D. Connolly. One gold, oblate-shaped object, nine times
as wide as it was thick, metallic and with sharp edges, flew
straight and level for 20-30 seconds.
July 25, 1959; Irondequoit, New York. 1 p.m. Witness:
technical illustrator W.D. Neva. One thin, crescent moon-shaped
object with a small white dome in the center, flew at tremendous
speed for 5-10 seconds.
Aug. 10, 1959; Goose AFB, Labrador, Canada. 1:28 a.m. Witness:
Royal Canadian Air Force pilot Flt. Lt. M.S. Mowat, on ground.
One large star-like light crossed 53* of sky in 25 minutes.
Sept. 13, 1959; Gills Rock, Wisconsin. 1:05 a.m. Witness: R.H.
Daubner. One round yellow light, with eight blue lights within
it, and then five larger red lights, flew very fast vertically
while making a pulsating jet noise. Sighting lasted 10 minutes.
Sept. 13, 1959; Bunker Hill AFB, Indiana. 4 p.m. Witnesses: at
least two control tower operators and the pilot of a Mooney
private airplane. One pear-shaped object, colored white, cream,
and metallic, with a trail under it. Object showed little
movement during 3 hours. Attempted intercept by USAF T-33 jet
trainer failed.
Oct. (3rd or 4th week), 1959; Telephone Ridge, Oregon. 9:15 p.m.
Witness: department store manager C.A. Cissman. One bright
light approached, hovered about 30 minutes, and then was up and
gone in 2 seconds.
Oct. 4, 1959; Quezon, Phillipine Islands. 9:25 p.m. Witnesses:
USN Lt. C.H. Pogson, CPO K.J. Moore. One large round or oval
object, changing from red to red-orange, flew straight and level
for 15 minutes.
Oct. 6, 1959; Lincoln, Nebraska. 8:15 p.m. Witnesses: Lt. Col.
L. Liggett (Selective Service) and wife. One round, white-yellow
light made several abrupt turns and flew very fast for 2 minutes.
Oct. 19. 1959; P]ainvjlle! Kansas. 9:25 p.m. Witness: Capt.
F.A. Henney, engineering instructor at USAF Academy, flying a
T-33 jet trainer. One bright yellowish light came head-on at the
T-33, the pilot avoided it and the light dimmed. Sighting lasted
30 seconds.
Nov. 18, 1959; Crystal Springs, Mississippi. 6:25 p.m.
Witness: J.M. Porter. A row of red lights flew slow, then
speeded up immensely. Sighting lasted 5-6 minutes.
Feb. 27, 1960; Rome AFB, New York. 6:27 p.m. Witnesses:
control tower officer Capt. J. Huey and four other tower
operators. One light trailing a white fan shape, made a mild
descent for 3-4 minutes. 5:55 p.m. Witness: Charles
March 4, 1960; Dubuque, Iowa. 5:5
Morris. Three elliptical-shaped objects made a slight climb for
4 minutes. Film exposed during sighting showed no images of the
objects.
March 23, 1960; Indianapolis, Indiana. 3:35 a.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. E.I. Larsen. A series of balls, arranged like an
"X" with one diagonal line, seen for 3/4 of a minute. Note:
little data on the case in the files.
April 12, 1960; LaCamp, Louisiana. 9 p.m. Witness: Monroe
Arnold. One fiery-red disc exploded four or five times.
Analysis of paint samples from explosion proved inconclusive.
Sighting lasted 2-3 seconds.
April 17, 1960; Richards-Gebauer AFB, Missouri. 8:29 p.m.
Witnesses: USAF Maj. J.G. Ford and Link representative A.
Chapdelaine, using a 48x telescope. One reddish glow made an odd
orbit for 2.5 minutes.
April 25, 1960; Shelby, Montana. 7-10 p.m. Witness: Mrs. M.
Clark. Five circular objects flew in trail formation, hovered
and accelerated and made sharp turns. Case file includes other
reports from Mrs. Clark for previous 3 years.
July 19, 1960; St. Louis, Missouri. 8:30 p.m. Witness: T.L.
Ochs. One round, bright red light flew overhead, stopped and
hovered, and then backed up. Sighting lasted 20 minutes. Note:
Ochs reported similar sightings on three following nights.
Aug. 23, 1960; Wichita, Kansas. 3::24 a.m. Witness: Boeing
aeronautical engineer C.A. Komiske. One round object with yellow
lights coming from what looked like three triangular windows at
bottom. Object was dull orange. Flew in an arc for 2 minutes.
Aug. 29, 1960; Crete, Illinois. 4:05 p.m. Witness: farmer Ed
Schneeweis. One shiny, round, silver object flew straight up
very fast for 18 seconds.
Sept. 10, 1960; Ridgecrest, California. 9:50 p.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. M.G. Evans. Two light gray glowing objects, saucer
or boomerang-shaped, which swished when accelerating. Seen 1-2
seconds each.
Oct. 5, 1960; Mt. Kisko, New York. 7:37 p.m. Witness: E.G.
Crossland. One bright, star-like light moved across 120^ of sky
in 20 seconds.
Nov. 27, 1960; Chula Vista, California. 7:30 p.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. L.M. Hart. One orange-red point of light made huge
circles and stopped during the 20-30 minute sighting.
Nov. 29, 1960; south of Kyushu, Japan. 6:38 p.m. Witnesses:
USAF Lt. Col. R.L. Blwlin (sp?) and Maj. F.B. Brown, flying a
T-33 jet trainer. One white light 8lowed and paralleled the
course of the T-33 for 10 minutes.
Feb, 27, 1961; Bark River, Michigan. 10:15 p.m. Witness: Mrs.
LaPalm. One fiery-red, round object, preceded by light rays,
slowed and descended, while her dog howled. Sighting lasted 10
minutes.
Spring, 1961; Kemah, Texas. Case missing from official files.
April 24, 1961; 200 miles SW of San Francisco, California (35'
50' N., 125' 40 W.). 3:34 a.m. Witnesses: aircraft commander
Capt. H.J. Savoy and navigator lst Lt. M.W. Rand, on USAF RC-l2lD
patrol plane. One reddish-white, round object or light, similar
to satellite. Observed for 8 minutes.
May 22, 1961; Tyndall AFB, Florida. 4:30 p.m. Witnesses: Mrs.
A.J. Jones and Mrs. R.F. Davis. One big silver dollar disc
hovered and revolved, then suddenly disappeared after 15 minutes.
June 2, 1961; Miyako Jima, Japan. 10:17 P.m. Witnesses: lst
Lt. R.N. Monahan and Hazeltine Electric Co. technical
representative D.W. Mattison. One blue-white light flew erratic
course at varying speed, in an arc-like path for 5 minutes.
July 7, 1961; Copemish, Michigan. 11 p.m. Witness: waitress
Nannette Hilley. One large ball flew slow, split into four after
45 minutes. Four flew close formation, descended and flew away
to the west. Total sighting lasted 1 hour.
July ll, 1961; Springfield, Ohio. 7:45 p.m. Witnesses: ex-air
navigator G. Scott, Mrs. Scott, and neighbors. One round, bright
light like shiny aluminum, passed overhead in 20 minutes.
July 20, 1961; Houston, Texas. 88 a.m. Witnesses: Trans-Texas
Airlines Capt. A.V. Beather, flying DC-3, plus vague report from
ground radar. Two very bright white light or objects flew in
trail formation for 30 minutes.
Aug. 12, 1961; Kansas City, Kansas. 9 p.m. Witnesses: college
seniors J.B. Furkenhoff and Tom Phipps. One very large oval
object with a fin extending from one edge to the center; like a
sled with lighted car running boards. Hovered at 50' altitude
for 3-5 minutes, then flew straight up and east.
Nov. 21, 1961; Oldtown, Florida. 7:30 p.m. Witnesses: C.
Locklear and Helen Hatch. One round, red-orange object flew
straight up and faded after 3-4 minutes.
Nov. 23, 1961; Sioux City, Iowa. 9:30 p.m. Witness: F.
Braunger. One bright red star flew straight and level for 15
minutes.
Dec. 13, 1961; Washington, D.C. 5:05 p.m. Witnesses: C.F.
Muncy, ex-U.S. Navy pilot W.J. Myers, and G. Weber. One dark
diamond-shaped object with a bright tip flew straight and level
for 1-3 minutes.
Feb. 25, 1962; Kotzbue, Alaska. 7:20 p.m. Witnesses: one U.S.
Army private, six anonymous civilians. One red light, trailed 30
seconds later by a blue light. Sighting lasted 5 minutes.
March l, 1962; Salem, New York. 10:35 p.m. Witness: Mrs. L.
Doxsey, 66. One gold-colored box, 12-14"x3-4", flew straight and
level across the horizon for 3-4 minutes.
.
March 26, 1962; Ramstein Air Base, West Germany. 1:35 p.m.
Witness: USAF Capt. J.M. Lowery, from an unspecified aircraft.
One thin, cylindrical object--l/3 snout, 2/3 tail fins--flew at
an estimated Mach 2.7 (2,000 m.p.h.) for 5-8 seconds.
March 26, 1962; Naperville, Illinois. 11:40 p.m. Witnesses:
Mrs. D. Wheeler, Claudine Milligan. Six or eight red balls,
arranged in a rectangular formation, became two objects with
lights by the end of the 15 minute sighting.
March 26, 1962; Westfield, Massachusette. 10:45 p.m. Witnesses:
many unidentified young people. One large red ball flew or fell
down, then went back up during 3-10 minute sighting. Note: May
26?
April 4, 1962; Wurtland, Kentucky. 0150Z. Witnesses: G.R.
Wells and J. Lewis, using 117x telescope. One small object
changing brightness, gave off smoke but remained stationary like
a comet for 6 minutes. Case missing from official files.
June 21, 1962; Indianapolis, Indiana. 4 a.m. Witnesses: Lt.
Col. H. King and tail gunner M/Sgt. Roberts, aboard a B-52 heavy
jet bomber. Three bright, star-like lights: one seen; 10
seconds later, two more were seen. Total sighting took 3
minutes.
June 30, 1962; Richmond, Virginia. 9 a.m. Witness: 13 year old
Meadors. One red, star-like light seen for an unspecified length
of time. No further details in files.
July 19, 1962. Bayhead, New Jersey. 9:30 p.m. Witnesses: C.T.
Loftus, H. Wilbert. Four or five lights darted about the sky for
7-10 minutes.
July 29, 1962; Ocean Springs, Mississippi. 11:20 p.m.
Witnesses: Mr. and Mrs. M.O. Barton. One bright cherry-red,
diamond-shaped object flew slow, hovered, made fast 1/2 loops for
l0 minutes.
Aug. 18, 1962; Bermuda. 5 p.m. Witnesses: owner M. Sheppard
and chief announcer A. Seymour of radio station. Three
dull-white, egg-shaped objects wavered as they moved for 20
minutes.
Sept. 21, 1962; WSW of Biloxi, Mississippi, in the Gulf of
Mexico. 7:37 p.m. Witness: fishing boat captain S.A. Guthrie.
Two objects, red and black with orange streaks, one as big as the
Moon, and the other smaller. Arced across the sky for 13
minutes.
Oct. 23, 1962; Farmington, Utah. 3 p.m. Witness: R.O.
Christensen. One grey and silver ball, trailing what looked like
twine with two knots in it, swerved, and climbed away at a 45'
angle, making a sound like a flock of ducks (rushing air).
Twenty seconds.
Nov. 17, 1962; Tampa, Florida. 99 p.m. Witness: F.L. Swindale,
college graduate and ex-USMC Capt. Three bright star-like lights
approached, hovered and bounced, then faded after 11-15 minutes.
May 18, 1953; New Plymouth, New Zealand. 10:30 p.m. Witness:
C.S. Chapman, 15. One white, fuzzy, flashing light hovered and
darted around for 4 minutes.
May 22, 1963; Pequannock, New Jersey. 10:45 p.m. Witness: Myra
Jackson. Four pink wheels spun or rolled very fast from east to
west in succession, each taking about 1 second.
June 15, 1963; 200 miles north of Venezuela (14* 27' N., 69* 57'
E.). 10:39 a.m. Witness: 3rd Mate R.C. Chamberlin, of S/
Thetis. One luminous disc travelled at 1.5 times the speed of
satellite for 3-4 minutes.
Summer, 1963; Middletown, New York. 9:30 or 10 p.m. Witness:
Grace Dutcher. Eight-ten lights moved at random, then in an oval
formation, then singly, during the 1 minute sighting.
July 1, 1963; Glen Ellyn, Illinois. 8 p.m. Witness: R.B.
Stiles, ll, using a theodolite. One light, the size of a match
head at arm's length, flashed and moved around the sky for 1.5
hours.
Aug. 11, 1963; Warrenville, Illinois. 10 p.m. Witness: R.M.
Boersma. One light moved around the sky for 20 seconds.
Aug. 13, 1963; St. Gallen, Switzerland. 8:04 p.m. Witness:
A.F. Schelling. One fireball became a dark object after 4
minutes, and then a bigger glow, a minute later, and finally
exploded. Note: same witness had another, undescribed, sighting
on Aug. 14
Sept. 14, 1963; Susanville, California. 3:15 p.m. Witness:
E.A. Grant, veteran of 37 years training forest fire lookouts for
the U.S. Forest Service. One round object intercepted a long
object and either attached itself to the latter or disappeared.
Sighting lasted l0 minutes.
Sept. 15, 1963; Vandalia, Ohio. 66 p.m. Witness: Mrs. F.E.
Roush. Two very bright gold objects--one shaped like a banana
and the other like an ear of corn--one remained stationary, the
other moved from west to north during 10 minutes,
Oct. 4, 1963; Bedford, Ohio. 3:32 p.m. Witness: R.E.
Carpenter, 15. One intense oblong light with tapered ends and
surrounded by an aqua haze, flashed and flickered while
stationary for 15 seconds.
Oct. 23, 1963; Meridian, Idaho. 8:35 p.m. Witnesses: several
unnamed students, including Gordon. One object shaped like a
circle from below and like a football from the side, hovered low
over the observers, making a deep, pulsating, loud, extremely
irritating sound, for 6 minutes.
Oct. 24, 1963; Cupar Fife, Scotland. No time given. Witnesses:
A. McLean (12) and G. McLean (8). One light moved for an
unspecified length of time. No further details in files. Note:
Project Blue Book chief Maj. H. Quintanilla told the youngsters,
in a letter, that this was "one of the most complete" of the
unexplained cases for the year.
Dec. 11, 1963; McMinnville, Oregon. 7 a.m. Witness: W.W.
Dolan, professor of mathematics and astronomy, and dean of the
faculty of Linfield College. One bright, star-like light
hovered, slowed, dimmed and flashed in 1 minute.
Dec. 16, 1963; 800 miles north of Midway Island (40* N., 175* 54'
W.). 5:05 p.m. Witness: unspecified persons aboard a military
aircraft. One white light blinked 2-3 times per second as it
moved very fast across the sky for 15 seconds.
April 3, 1964; Monticello, Wisconsin. 9 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. R. Wold (he was a graduate student in anthropology).
Four huge red lights in a rectangular formation, with a white
light above, were near the ground, tilted and flew away after 3-4
minutes.
April 11, 1964; Homer, New York. 6:30 p.m. Witnesses:
physiotherapist W.B. Ochsner and wife. Two cloud-like objects
darkened; one shot away and returned during the 30-45 minute
sighting.
April 24, 1964; Socorro, New Mexico. 5:45 p.m. Witness:
Socorro policeman Lonnie Zamora. Watched object with flame
underneath descend toward the desert. Two small humanoids
observed near vertical oval on ground. Later watched object take
off with a roar, go silent and fly away. Burning and charred
brush found at landing sight.
May 9, 1964; Chicago, Illinois. 10:20 p.m. Witness: J.R. Betz,
U.S. District Court reporter. Three light green crescent-shaped
objects, about half the apparent size of the Moon, flew very fast
in tight formation from east to west, oscillating in size and
color for 3 seconds.
May 18, 1964; Mt. Vernon, Virginia. 5:15 p.m. Witness: civil
engineer F. Meyers. One small, glowing white oval split twice
after moving from the right of the Moon around to the left.
Sighting lasted 17 minutes.
May 26, 1964; Cambridge, Massachusetts. 7:43 p.m. Witness: P.
Wankowicz, RAF pilot and ex-Smithsonian satellite tracker. One
thin, white ellipsoid (3.5 times as long as wide) flew straight
and level for 3-4 seconds.
May 26, 1964; Pleasantview, Pennsylvania. 11 p.m. Witness:
Rev. H.C. Shaw. One yellow-orange light, shaped like the bottom
of a ball, was spotted in a field and chased down the road for 2
miles.
June 13, 1964; Toledo, Ohio. 9:15 p.m. Witness: B.L. English,
announcer for radio station WTOD. Three glowing white spheres,
glowing red on their sides, moved slow, hovered and then moved in
circles very fast, all the while making a low, rumbling sound.
July 16, 1964; 15 miles south of Houghton Lake, Michigan. 11:15
p.m. Witness: Northern Air Service pilot K. Jannereth. Four
white lights in a stepped-up echelon formation, were joined by
two more. They closed in on the airplane, then rapidly slowed nd
flew along with it for a total of 5 minutes.
July 20, 1964; Littleton, Illinois. 4:45 a.m. Witness: J.J.
Winkle. One 60' diameter round-topped, flat-bottomed object with
a long acetylene-colored flame shooting downward, flew straight
and level, made a half loop, then rose up. Sighting lasted l
minute.
July 27, 1964; Norwich, New York. 7:30 p.m. Witness:
Duabert, engineering supervisor. One aluminum sphere with a
luminous ring, remained stationary for 4-5 minutes.
July 27, 1964; Denver, Colorado. 8:20 p.m. Witness: A. Borsa.
One white ball of fire, the size of a car, climbed slowly, then
speeded up. Sighting lasted 2-3 minutes.
Aug. 10, 1964; Wake Island. 5:16 a.m. Witnesses: aircraft
commander Capt. B.C. Jones and navigator lst Lt. H.J. Cavender,
in parked USAF C-124 transport plane. One reddish, blinking
light approached the runway, stopped and made several reverses
during 2 minutes.
Aug. 15, 1964; New York, New York. 1:20 a.m. Witness: S.F.
D'Alessandro. One 10'x5' bullet-shaped object with wavy lines on
the rounded front part and six pipes along the straight rear
portion, made a "whishhh" sound. Witness' dog growled during
.
sighting.
Aug. 15, 1964; Yosemite National Park, California. 8:15 a.m.
Witnesses: E.J. Haug, of the San Francisco Orchestra and the San
Francisco Conservatory of Music; and C.R. Bubb, a high school
mathematics teacher. Three bright silver, round objects, in a
stack formation, flew very fast, changing positions within the
formation. The sound of rushing air was heard during the 3-4
second sighting.
Aug. 18, 1964; Atlantic Ocean, 200 miles east of Dover, Delaware.
12:35 a.m. Witnesses: Maj. D.W. Thompson and First Pilot lst
Lt. J.F. Jonke, on a USAF C-124 transport plane. One round,
blurred, reddish-white object was on a collision course with the
C-124 from ahead and below. The airplane evaded the object.
Sighting las ted 2 minutes.
Sept. 10, 1964; Cedar Grove, New Jersey. 7:09 p.m. Witness:
chemist P.H. DePaolo. Four white lights, 3-4 apart, were seen
to the north, going west for 45 seconds.
Nov. 14, 1964; Menominee Falls, Wisconsin. 9:40 p.m. Witnesses:
Dr. G.R. Wagner, MD; and two girls. Three dim, reddish lights
flew through a 160^ arc in 5-6 seconds.
Nov. 19, 1964; 1,400 miles east of Tokyo, Japan (34' 55' N., 164*
05' E.). Witnesses: unidentified military persons. One bright
white flashing light was travelling from horizon to horizon in 20
seconds.
Jan, 23, 1965; Williamsburg, Virginia. 8:40 a.m. Witness: Mr.
T.F. Mains. One mushroom or lightbulb-shaped object, 75-80'
high, 25' diameter on top and l0' bottom diameter; metallic grey
with a red-orange glow on the near side and a blue glow on the
far side. The object made a sound like a vacuum cleaner. The
witness' car electrical system was affected as the object moved
away at an altitude of 4'. The sighting lasted 25 seconds.
March 4, 1965; Corvallis, Oregon. 9:23 p.m. Witness: W.V.
Harrison. Three lights rose from the ground, several seconds
apart. The next day, an oily spot was found at the site.
March 8, 1965; Mt. Airy, Maryland. 7:40 p.m. Witness: J.H.
Martin, instrument maker for U.S. Bureau of Standards. Six
lights flew overhead slowly for 3 minutes.
April 4, 1965; Keesler AFB, Mississippi. 4:05 a.m. Witnesses:
USAF A/2c Corum, a weather observer; confirmation by college
student R. Pittman not clear from available data. One 40' black,
oval object with four lights along the bottom, flew in and out of
the clouds for 15 seconds.
May 7, 1965; Oxford, Michigan. 7:30 p.m. Witness: M.E.
Marshall. One light, like a satellite, split into two parts, one
of which was copperish color, then two more joined up. One
object may have been tumbling. Sighting lasted 1 minute.
July 6, 1965; Kiel, Wisconsin. 9:30 p.m. Witness: Mrs. E.R.
Hayner. One flashing light, like a satellite, was seen for less
than 1 minute. No further data was in the files.
July 25, 1965; Castalia, Ohio. 9:15 p.m. Witness: amateur
astronomer M.D. Harris, 16. One bright blue star crossed 90 of
sky in 10-15 seconds.
Aug. 4, 1965; Dallas, Texas. 9:30 p.m. Witness: J.A. Carter,
19. One light flew fast, straight and level for 12 seconds. No
further data in files.
Aug. 4, 1965; Tinley Park, Illinois. 11:35 p.m. Witnesses: two
unnamed 14 year olds. One light moved around the sky for 16-17
seconds. No further data in files.
Aug. 19, 1965; Cherry Creek New York. 8:20 p.m. Witnesses:
Mrs. William Butcher, son Harold, 17, and children. A large
elliptical object, with a reddish vapor underneath, came close to
the ground, then shot straight up into the clouds a few seconds
later. Radio drowned out by static, a tractor engine stopped.
When the object was on the ground, a steady beeping sound could
be heard. Afterwards, a strange odor was noticed, and the next
day, a purplish liquid, 2"x2" marks and patches of singed grass
were found at the site. A bull bellowed and tried to break its
bonds.
Aug. 30, 1965; Urbana, Ohio. 10:30 p.m. Witnesses: M.A. Lilly,
N. Smith, T. Nastoff. One white ball, 5-8' in diameter and
trailed by a 2-3' light, hit the road 100' in front of the
witness' car, bounced and flew away. Sighting lasted 3-4
seconds.
Sept. 3, 1965; Exeter, New Hampshire. 2 a.m. Witnesses: Exeter
Patrolmen Eugene Bertrand, Jr. and David Hunt, and Norman
Muscarello. One large, dark, elliptical object with a row of red
lights around it, moved slowly and erratically around houses and
trees, while lights blinked in sequence. Farm animals were very
noisy. Sighting lasted about 1 hour.
Sept. 3, 1965; Damon, Texas. 11 p.m. Witnesses: Brazoria
County Chief Sheriff's Deputy Billy McCoy and Deputy Robert
Goode. One triangular object, 150-200' long, 40-50' thick at
middle and dark grey, with a long, bright, pulsing, purple light
on the right side and a long blue light on the left side. Came
from distance to 150' off highway and 100' in the air. Purple
light illuminated ground beneath object and interior of police
car. Driver felt heat on his left arm. Initial sighting lasted
5-10 minutes. Second sighting.occurred later that night.
Sept. 25, 1965; Chisholm, Minnesota. 9:55 a.m. Witness: Bett
Diamon. Five orange lights in a row flew fast and made an abrupt
turn during the 1 minute sighting.
Sept. 25, 1965; Rodeo, New Mexico. 10 p.m. Witnesses: Dr.
George Walton, physical chemist, and wife. Two round white
objects flew side-by-side, at 30-50' altitude, pacing the
witnesses' car for 6 minutes.
Oct. 4, Middletown, Ohio. Wiitness: Tucker. Case missing
from official files.
Feb. 2, 1966; Salisbury, North Carolina. 11:15 p.m. Witnesses:
Mr. and Mrs. L.J. Wise. One silver, diamond-shaped object with
several balls constantly in very fast motion around it, and much
light. Object hovered over the trees for 3-4 minutes, while a
dog barked, and then zipped out of sight. Sighting lasted 1
hour.
Feb. 6, 1966; Nederland, Texas. 5:45 a.m. Witnesses: Mr. and
Mrs. K.R. Gulley. One yellow, lighted object at 500; altitude
and a pulsating red glow on the lawn. The house lights went out,
and high frequency bothered the witnesses' ears. Sighting lasted
5-10 minutes.
March 20, 1966; Miami, Florida.. 12:15 a.m. Witness: USAF Res.
Maj. K.C. Smith, employee of NASA at Cape Kennedy. One pulsating
light which varied from white to intense blue made a jerky ascent
and then rapidly accelerated away to the north after 5 minutes.
March 22, 1966; Houston, Texas. 1:30 a.m. Witness: S.J.
Musachia. White flashing lights, and the air full of smoke. Lit
up witness' apartment. Sound of "yen " heard up close
during 4 minute sighting.
March 23, 1966; Temple, Oklahoma. 5:05 a.m. Witness: W.E.
Laxson. One large object, like a wingless C-124 transport plane;
75' long, 8' high and 12' wide; with a bubble canopy on top. Sat
on highway, a man dressed in military work clothes entered, and
it rose after about 40 seconds.
March 26, 1966; Texhoma, Oklahoma. Midnight. Witnesses: Mrs.
P.N. Beer and Mrs. E. Smith. One flashing light buzzed their car
from the front then hovered. Sighting lasted l0 minutes.
April 5, 1966; Alto, Tennessee. 11:55 p.m. Witness: W. Smith.
One oval object with a dark top, appeared cone-shaped when
moving. It made a high-frequency noise during the 2.5 hour
sighting.
April 5, 1966; Lycoming, New York. 3 a.m. Witness: Lillian
Louis. One vapor-like sphere hovered and spun at low altitude,
shooting its exhaust onto the ground below. Sighting of 1
minute.
April 30, 1966; Sacramento, California. 3:15 a.m. Witness:
Anita Miller. One light moved around the sky for 2.5 hours. No
further detail in files.
May 7, 1966; Goodfellow AFB, Texas. 9:55 p.m. Witness: A/3c
W.L. Whitehead. One short, cylindrical object with pointed ends
and a yellow light at one end and blue light at the other, flew
straight and level for 35 seconds.
June 6, 1966; Spooner, Wisconsin. 9:30 p.m. Witness: Dorothy
Gray. Two domed discs with sparkling upper surfaces and square
windows in their tops, revolved above a lake, apparently causing
strange behavior of the lake water during the 25 second sighting.
June 8, 1966; Kansas, Ohio. 6:45 a.m. Witness: Max Baker. One
bright silver, cigar-shaped object, as long as an airliner,
buzzed the witness' car. Sighting lasted 1 minute.
June 18, 1966; Burnsville, North Carolina. 12:30 a.m.
Witnesses: members of a Boy Scout group, including Sterrett.
One bell-shaped object with three flashing red lights hovered for
5 hours and was then joined by six others.
June 27, 1966; 400 miles east of Wake Island (19* N., 172* E.).
4 a.m. Witness: Radio Officer Steffen Soresen, of the S/ Mt.
Vernon Victory. One "cloud" expanded with a light inside, and
then accelerated away after several minutes.
July l1, 1966; Union, Pennsylvania. 7:45 p.m. Witnesses: Carl
Wood and Charles Hawthorne. One large (100' wide, 20' high)
bright red object with small windows and yellow lights. The
object emitted a humming noise, seemingly from the outside, and a
qrinding noise which seemed to come from inside. Observed for 1
hour.
July 25, 1966; Vanceboro, North Carolina. 1 a.m. Witness:
college student James Clark. One object which changed color from
orange to red to blue to green and back to orange. Followed
witness' car at high speed, then stopped and hovered over the
car. Rose and flew up and out of sight in less than 5 seconds.
Entire sighting involved about 1 hour.
July 31, 1966; Presque Isle State Park, Pennsylvania. 7:25 p.m.
Witnesses: Douglas Tibbetts, 16; Betty Klem, 16; Anita Haifley,
22; and Gerald Labelle, 29. Square or hexagonal object with
edges lit or reflecting light, came tumbling down from right to
left. Stopped 5-10' above the beach and settled heavily down;
circle of spotlights at top were visible when it was on the
ground. Sighting lasted 5 minutes. .
Aug. 19, 1966; Donnybrook, North Dakota. 4:50 p.m. Witness:
U.S. Border Patrolman Don Flickenger. Round disc with domed top,
30' in diameter and 15' high, colored white, silvery or aluminum.
Moved across a valley from the southeast, hovered over a
reservoir, appeared to land in a small field, then rose up into
clouds very rapidly. Sighting lasted 5 minutes.
Aug. 23, 1966; Columbus, Ohio. 77 p.m. Witnesses: Broomall and
Gilpin. One circular, luminous white object split into five
objects and all streaked away toward the west. Sighting lasted
15 minutes.
Aug. 26, 1966; Gaylesville, Alabama. 8:50 p.m. Witnesses: Mr.
and Mrs. Funk and their three children. A cluster of four small,
glowing, orange-yellow lights in a triangular formation, moved
from east to west for 4.5 minutes.
Sept. 1, 1966; Willsboro, New York. 2:45 p.m. Witness: T.H.
Ridman. One oval object with lights that flashed red and white
and occasionally blue, travelled west, then disappeared downward.
It returned, several minutes later, at which time a loud noise
was heard. The entire sighting lasted 30 minutes.
Sept. 6, 1966; Suffolk County AFB, New York. 6:50 p.m.
Witnesses: Stahl and Ladesic. One white cylinder of light came
from the east at high speed, stopped and hovered for 3 minutes,
and then turned and slowly disappeared. Sighting lasted 8
minutes.
Sept. 9, 1966; Franklin Springs, New York. 9 p.m. Witness:
Jacobson. One solid object, larger than an army tank, with
lights all around it, made a low humming sound and disappeared
into woods at the end of the 30 minute sighting.
Sept. 13, 1966; Gwinner, North Dakota. 7:30 a.m. Witness:
Rotenberger. One silvery-grey ellipse with a clear bubble
protruding from its top, hovered about a mile away, then landed
within 300 yards and took off very fast. It made a low-pitched
whine during the 5 minute sighting.
Sept. 28, 1966; Wilmington, Ohio. 3:38 p.m. Witness: Clarke.
Three round, oval-shaped, aluminum-colored objects with rotating
rings around them. Two remained stationary, while the third
varied its altitude during the 90 second sighting.
Oct. 5, 1966; Osceola, Wisconsin. Witnesses: several members of
one family. One small, bright orange, moon-shaped object
remained stationary in the northeast for about 20 minutes, then
suddenly took off very fast to the WNW.
Oct. 23, 1966; Southhampton, Long Island, New York. 6 p.m.
Witness: Mr Acquino. One object with arms in front of it which
sparkled like an arc-light. Traveled south along some power
lines, then turned southwest. Made a slight humming sound during
the 4 minute sighting.
Oct. 26, 1966; Cold Bay Air Force Station, Alaska. No time
given. Witness: civilian control tower operator Ralston. One
white object approached runway at 50' altitude. Runway lights
were then turned on, and object accelerated and climbed away so
fast that witness was unable to use binoculars. Sighting lasted
3 seconds.
Nov. 8, 1966; Saginaw, Michigan. At night. Witness: college
graduate Annis. A group of lights that flashed and changed color
hung stationary, almost touching the road, and would abruptly
vanish during the 5 minute sighting.
Dec. 25, 1966; Monroe, Oregon. 33 a.m. Witnesses: civilians and
military persons. Three round objects, as large as cars, gave
off vapor, then became three bright reddish-orange lights. Blast
at beginning of 90 minute sighting pushed one witness against a
car.
Feb. 6, 1967; Odessa, Delaware. 8:45 p.m. Witnesses: Donald
and Marie Guseman. One large, Saturn-shaped object--5O' in
diameter and 20' high--with two bright lights, a green light on
one side and a red light on the other. Hovered motionless over
the trees, then slowly moved north and suddenly disappeared after
2 minutes.
Feb. 12, 1967; Grand Rapids, Michigan. 3:40 a.m. Witness: Mr.
Lou Atkinson. Four fluorescent, football-shaped objects, a dull,
almost grey luminous color; flew northeast in a very rigid
formation for 4-10 seconds. Made a chirping noise.
Feb. 16, 1967; Stoughton, Wisconsin. 9:11 p.m. Witness: Miss
Lynn Marsh. One light with faded edges seemed to follow observer
in her car for 5-6 minutes.
Feb. 20, 1967; Oxford, Wisconsin. 3:10 a.m. Witness: USAF
veteran/truck driver Stanton Summer. One orange-red object flew
parallel to truck for 2 minutes.
Feb. 27, 1967; Grand Haven, Michigan. 8:19 p.m. Witnesses:
Sheriff Grysen, wife and others. Large white light, with smaller
red and green lights seen to the sides. Made almost
instantaneous 90^ turn to left, shot out over road and stopped,
moving too fast to follow. Sighting lasted 1 hour, 11 minutes.
March 6, 1967; Benton Harbor, Michigan. 12:01 a.m. Witnesses:
Jerome Wolanin, assistant news director of radio station and
former policeman, and wife. One round saucer or oval-shaped
object with red, green and yellow lights around bottom rim which
pulsated red. Flew level, east to west, and was joined by second
object from west. First object opened top, second came over and
hovered for 30 seconds and disappeared. Sighting lasted more
than 40 minutes. Objects made hissing sound.
March 6, 1967; Galesburg-Moline, Illinois. 4:25 a.m. Witness:
Deputy Sheriff Frank Courson. One object shaped like a rubber
cup which is placed under furniture leg, with a dome set in the
cup. Bottom of object spun rapidly, rim pulsated red. Approached
witness and passed overhead at low altitude, making a hieeing
sound.
March 9, 1967; Galesburg, Illinois. 7:10 p.m. Witnesses: two
housewives. One object shaped like a pancake with a rounded top;
object was pulsating red, with red lights around its rim.
Approached witnesses and seemed to explode with a brilliant white
light that lasted 10 seconds and almost blinded them. Then it
accelerated to the north and disappeared.
March 9, 1967; Onawa, Iowa. 9:05 p.m. Witness: Jack Lindley.
One bright white, saucer-shaped object, as big as a jet airliner,
flew straight and fast to the east for 2 minutes.
March 22, 1967; Wapello, Iowa. 10:20 p.m. Witness: Douglas
Eutsler, 15. Fluorescent, solid, multicolored lights stood
still, then flew away at high speed after 1 minute.
March 24, 1967; Belt, Montana. 99 p.m. Witness: truck driver
Ken Williams. One dome-shaped object, emitting a bright light,
landed in a ravine. As the witness approached, it took off and
settled back, hidden from the highway. Sighting lasted several
minutes.
March 26, 1967; New Winchester, Ohio. 4 p.m. Witnesses: man,
woman, three boys. One oval object, which looked like copper or
brass with the sun shining on it, flew from southeast to
northwest with tumbling motion for 30 minutes.
May 17, 1967; Rural Hall, North Carolina. 8:30 p.m. Witness:
Red Ledford. One round, orange-colored object, similar in size
to a small aircraft, zigzagged back and forth over a jet that was
heading northeast for 5 minutes.
June 24, 1967; Austin, Texas. 3:12 a.m. Witness: artist Ray
Stanford. One solid, blue-white, elliptical object flew from
northwest to northeast and stopped, seemingly in response to
flashlight signal, for 1.5 minutes. The object then proceeded
along its original path at high speed and disappeared behind
clouds. Sighting lasted 9 minutes.
June 29' 1967; Scotch Plains, New Jersey. 1:30 a.m. Witness:
truck driver Damon Brown. One oyster-shaped object--2OO' wide,
and 25-30' thick--with a huge red light at each end and one on
the bottom, and a row of blue lights along the bottom. Circled
m.n aircraft, hovering then moving rapidly, and then followed the
witness' car for about 500', veered south and departed at great
speed after 8-10 minutes.
July 10, 1967; Lizelia, Mississippi. 5:50 p.m. Witness: golf
pro Harold Washington (Capt, USMC, ret.). One object with a
dome, the top colored gunmetal blue, the bottom the color of old
lead. Moved east, crossed the highway tilted upward, moved to
the right, accelerated and disappeared into the clouds after 3-5
seconds. Object made a swishing sound.
Oct. 18, 1967; Lake Charles, Louisiana. 9 p.m. Witness: John
Herbert. One bright, fiery ball flashed four times while moving
east, just above the tree tops. Sighting lasted 1 minute.
Feb. 9, 1968; Groveton, Missouri. 4:20 a.m. Witness: Mr. R.W.
Bland. One object, 100' in diameter, with concave sides having
"portholes" in the center of each gave off yellow-green light.
Hovered 25' above ground, then moved rapidly toward the
southwest. Gave off pulsating sound, like a length of wire
whirled at high speed above the head. Sighting lasted 1-5
minutes.
Sept. 15, 1968; near Ocala, Florida. 9:30 p.m. Witness:
missionary pilot Jay Cole, flying a Beech C-45 twin-engined
utility plane. One light performed aerobatics for 15 minutes and
then vanished. A second light appeared, heading toward them on a
collision course, made a 90* turn and disappeared. Later, ground
radar told them a target was following them. Sightings lasted 15
minutes.
Nov. 23, 1968. Newton, Georgia. 8:05 p.m. Witness: Mr. Jones,
accountant. One oblong light, 120-150' wide. Hovering 75' above
the ground, it emitted a beam that lit the ground. Radio gave
off static, then car engine stopped. Light flew away vertically
and car engine restarted itself. Sighting lasted 3-4 minutes.
Jan. 17, 1969; Crittenden, Virginia. 3:24 a.m. Witness: Mr.
Roman Lupton, test facility mechanic. Several amber lights--one
of them blinking--in an elliptical formation, flew forward slowly
while moving up and down, then turned and disappeared after 2
minutes. Made a humming sound